Mt. Denali Expedition advice
|
Hey guys, new here. I’m in the army here in Alaska and the northern warfare training center put together a climbing team to summit mt Denali I’ve done a couple military climbing schools and we’re currently training hard and In good experienced hands.
|
|
Bacon and whiskey. No matter what happens you will have a smile with that. Better to call it Denali too. |
|
First recommendation for equipment is to take a UH-60 as far as you can ;) What do you currently have for footwear? |
|
Start by reading "Surviving Denali" Also do a search for Denali and you will find plenty of posts about gear for Denali. |
|
Lots of information out there on the web if you google. Check those out and then ask more specific questions. Also call the mountain Denali. The name was officially changed in 2015. |
|
Mt. McKinley? is that the highest cornfield in Ohio or something? |
|
Mark Pilate wrote: Koflach boots, snow shoes, crampons |
|
Nicholas Michael wrote: Haha, nice move on the title change. If you have the free cash, I’d look at replacing the Koflachs (Arctis Expeditions?) with something from the upper ranges of light and warm from Scarpa or La Sportiva (like Phantom 6000 or similar) what month are you going? The Koflachs are more than adequate, but definitely not in anyone’s top 5 I would think. Not sure if it’s even an option for the gear and skill set of the team, but I’d lobby hard for skis over snowshoes. I trained newbs in an Arctic light infantry unit for a bit and most took to skiing quickly. And just ask the Finns (vs Russians) which is more operationally effective from a military maneuverability standpoint. Edit: just saw SinRopa beat me to it. |
|
Uphill Athlete had a great video about Denali and climbing logistics and equipment. It appears they took it down from their YouTube channel but maybe poke about on their website. |
|
Nicholas Michael wrote: Nicholas - maybe I'll see you there. I have my orientation date set for May 21st. |
|
Mark Pilate wrote: I've been watching World War II (history channel on youtube who cover week to week stuff in depth) and that does ring a bell. |
|
SinRopa wrote: Arctic bunny boots ... |
|
When it's cold and day x of being tent bound, hot beverages can be everything. Something to do and a way to support each other by making them to keep positive tent vibes going. So like 16 oz nalgene with some insulation, which you can diy with some foam pad or reflectix or neoprene, and some variation in tasty mixes and teas. It's all about being able to be comfortable and get along in an uncomfortable place. And take care of your feet and keep yourself clean. Have fun! |
|
SinRopa wrote: Haha. F ‘in A right. Give me a bunch of Finns on skis, and I’ll take any country.... or bar in northern Minnesota. |
|
Also, bring a two way radio. Weather station is on Channel 1. I read somewhere that around 8PM daily, rangers provide weather details via two way radio. Also, it's nice to have some communication between others on the mountain. |
|
Piotr 123 wrote: Good point, but pretty sure as a military team, they’re gonna have some decent and versatile comms with them. |
|
My biggest dilemma are boots on Denali. Mons are too hot from Base Camp to Camp 3. But, perfect from Camp 3 to summit. La Sportiva/Spantik or similar are perfect Base Camp to Camp 3. But, maybe too cold from Camp 3 to summit. Optional "overboots" are a good option. |
|
SinRopa wrote: I get your thinking and would say that Mons are the way to go. Especially when going 3rd week in May. What do you all think about not bringing skies nor snow shoes? |
|
Lets discuss stoves. I think 99% of people bring liquid fuel stoves. What about canister stoves? Yes, canister stoves/gas don't work well in very cold temps. I feel as temptation is there to use canister stove, because of weight savings. I think canister stoves are the only type of stoves used on most 7,000 and 8,000 peaks. Because of simplicity and weight savings. Opinions? |
|
You ever see all the empty canisters littering high altitude camps? That's one good reason to go liquid fuel. I think a lot of the reason canisters stoves are so popular in the Himalaya and South America is the lack of available good quality liquid fuel. Not a problem in Alaska. Plus there is more time spent above 6000 m. camping in those areas. Lack of performance is offset by ease of use of canister stoves when you are just trying to stay alive. I have zero Denali experience but have climbed other peaks in the Alaska range. We used liquid fuel for camping but carried a canister stove for on route bivies. |
|
SinRopa wrote: Last time I was in Alaska we did a side-by-side test of an MSR XGK-EX (with a heat exchanger on the pot) and an MSR Reactor. We started with snow and measured the time to boil. The XGK took about 40% longer than the Reactor, not counting the time spent fiddling with the XGK to get it primed. That was in calm conditions. If it had been windy I think the difference would have been even greater. I was the one that brought the XGK. Ever since then I've used a Reactor instead, including a successful climb of Mt Logan (19,551') up in the Yukon. |