Patagonia Ascentionist 40 vs. TNF Phantom 38
|
Looking for a technical Ice/alpine pack, something that can be low-profile enough to not get in the way but also carries well enough to haul rope/rack/tools etc. some camera equipment and potentially gear for overnight missions. I'm really torn between the two, the Patagonia seems a little more lightweight and low-profile, but the North Face Phantom has a few nice features lacking on the Ascentionist (sleeves for tool picks, fully removable brain and waistbelt) and seems like it might handle loads a bit better, which is important for that bulky, heavy camera equipment. |
|
You may want to give the Mountain Equipment Tupilak Pack a look. I don't own one, but I looked into one hard at the beginning of the season and they get phenomenal reviews. Super lightweight, on-route alpine packs. If comfort is more what you're looking for, take a look at Osprey's new Mutant series. Some people love the Ascensionist Pack, and some hate it. |
|
I was in this boat not too long ago, looking for a good technical alpine pack. I can't really stress fit enough. A pack can have all the nicest features and the lowest weight, but if it doesn't fit you well, you'll still be miserable in it. |
|
I use the BD Mission 45 for most climbing use. It pretty big for a 45l in my opinion but the strippable design and removable brain is super nice. If you plan to do more hard climbing with a pack on, maybe get the 35 or a speed. If you carrying it mostly on approaches, occasionally over night I highly recommend. |
|
I was debating the same, since these packs are at a steep discount on backcountry. Looking at both and reading reviews both packs have drawbacks. |