Anyone Use Kayland Mountaineering Boots?

Howdy folks, I'm looking into getting my first pair of mountaineering boots, after borrowing or renting them for the last few years. I always see Kayland boots on Sierra Trading Post, and wonder about their quality and durability, given that they're notably cheaper than other similar mid-weight single boots (Sportiva Nepal, Scarpa Mont Blanc, etc.) Have any of Y'all ever used them?

I looked into them years ago and they seemed excellent.

STP is going to have discounted gear for a variety of reasons...they'll even have the others you mention available from time to time. BUT it really comes down to fit. Look into what fits, then worry about the price. When you're out there using them, you will not care what you paid for them.

Pretty sure I'm looking at the same pair. "Kayland Super Ice EVO"? I'm stuck between those and the Scarpa Rebel Pro.

I've been using a pair of Kayland M11+'s for a few years now, no problem with them. I definitely agree with what others have said about fit- by far the most important. Numb feet and lost toenails are no fun   

See my comments here, if you haven't already:  https://www.mountainproject.com/forum/topic/115186975/super-low-volume-boots#ForumMessage-115354856

Hi,

I've been climbing in a pair of Kayland M11's for several years.  They're stiff enough for the low level of ice climbing I'm capable of, yet hike pretty well.  Never got a serious blister during several trips, then raised a big one, but no problems since the one occurrence.

Although I wouldn't recommend it, They were warm on a two day trip in the Adirondack high peaks with temperatures at -22 Farenheit.  They were warm on climbs of Rainier Kautz Glacier route in July, Illiniza Sur, Cotopaxi, and two attempts of Chimborazo ; (still in good shape for more adventures. 
Have Fun,
Bob

Kayland boots are legit - no issues with quality or durability. Like Kathy S and Bob Chiang, I also had a pair of the (unfortunately) now discontinued M11+ boots - they worked well for my narrow, low-volume foot.

Jared C, FYI, the Super Ice EVO boots are more comparable to the La Sportive Nepal EVO/Cube or Scarpa Mont Blanc boots as opposed to the Scarpa Rebel Pro (the M11+ boots were like the Rebel Pro, but with a built-in gaiter).

Robert Gregory wrote: Kayland boots are legit - no issues with quality or durability. Like Kathy S and Bob Chiang, I also had a pair of the (unfortunately) now discontinued M11+ boots - they worked well for my narrow, low-volume foot.

Jared C, FYI, the Super Ice EVO boots are more comparable to the La Sportive Nepal EVO/Cube or Scarpa Mont Blanc boots as opposed to the Scarpa Rebel Pro (the M11+ boots were like the Rebel Pro, but with a built-in gaiter).

So they're pretty heavily insulated? 

The Super Ice EVO boots will be comparable in warmth to the La Sportiva Nepal EVO/Cube and Scarpa Mont Blanc boots and a little warmer than the Scarpa Rebel Pro.

I have a Pair i bought last year from STP, I got the Kayland Super EVO's.

They are extremely durable and very supportive and Warm.  I did the Rental thing for years and after one trip when it was in the 5 degree F range i decided i wanted to get something warmer that would take a beating.  When i got mine from STP i ordered like 5 pairs (2 sizes of 2 styles) then another boot just to see..  For me They fit really well at my street shoe size (I wear ASOLO 10.5 and got Kayland 10.5's)

The Reason i got the Kaylands is because they were going to be my first boot and i could tell that they were the most supportive & warm, and i could tell that they would take the least calf effort to keep my front points in place. Simple test would be to try them on around the house and step up on a stair with only the front edge.  You'll be able to get an idea how you are going to feel working the front points. I will keep them and use them till i blow them apart, however i am now looking for something a bit more sensitive to get in to more technical terrain where i want a bit more ankle articulation..