Improved Rescue Spider (with Bowline on a Bight)
|
I've been practicing some self-rescue techniques and working my way through Tyson and Loomis' book Climbing Self Rescue, and I think I've come up with a small but useful improvement on the standard rescue spider. Tyson and Loomis note one drawback to this setup: "Its only drawback is that its tether lengths are fixed. It is not as easy as a Purcell to adjust your position relative to your patient once connected." There's another, which is that it takes a decent length of cord to build, because the figure-8 has four strands going through it and the shorter loop ends up doubled. They recommend 20 feet. Replacing the figure-8 on a bight with a Bowline on a Bight solves both of these problems. The bowline on a bight creates two loops naturally, and as anyone who's used this knot to build an anchor with the climbing rope knows, the length of each loop is adjustable. This makes it much easier to position your patient comfortably in front of you so you're able to support her properly during the rappel. Like any bowline, it's also easier to untie after loading. Here's what it looks like: And a close-up, sans rappel device: Besides allowing for easier adjustment of the tether lengths, this knot takes up a LOT less cordage. I tied these in my rescue cordalette, an 18' length of 6mm cord, using Tyson and Loomis's recommendation of a 1.5' loop for the rescuer and a 1' loop for the victim. The figure-8 version loops took up 64" of doubled cord. Subtract those from Tyson and Loomis's recommendation of a 20' cordalette (a 120" loop) and you get a recommended 56" tail to tie the MMO in. The bowline on a bight version took up only 38" of doubled cord. That means to get the recommended 56" tail, you only need a 94" loop, or about a 15.5' cordalette. In a real pinch, you could probably get away with 12', which would be impossible with the figure-8 method. Thoughts? The only disadvantage I can think of is that not all climbers know how to tie a bowline on a bight. That's not an insignificant problem—self-rescue should use well-practiced skills. But for climbers that know the knot well, I think the BOB is a clear winner here. It's worth noting that since there's no tail to work loose, the BOB doesn't share the instability of the regular bowline. |
|
I was just working through rescue spiders today and I like that you are thinking outside of the box. In a rescue situation our level of risk acceptance might have to increase with our available materials but one could argue that one loop of 6mm cord is not redundant or safe enough. When the rescue spider is tied with the figure 8, one side is doubled; you could tie the other end with extra cordage and then tie a redundant knot on that side as well but that makes the spider even more complicated and eats up a ton of cordage. |
|
Thanks for the feedback. I'll have to try your method with the rope. My first impression is that the spider would be a bit quicker and cleaner, but maybe not. I do find it's less of a hassle to rappel with the rope ends hanging below me rather than staying tied in, but that's probably just personal preference. |
|
As far as the ropes hanging below you: as soon as you release the mmo and weight your tandem rappel, you simply unclip the fig 8 on a bight from the victim, retrieve the locker from the anchor, and toss the rope: added bonus you already have a safety knot in the end of your rope. |
|
Many of the self-rescue books out there provide invaluable information, but often involve very complicated and unorthodox techniques that can be duplicated using much easier means. Trying to remember a complicated system that requires extra gear and dozens of steps is not something you want to rely on in an emergency (unless you're SAR and you practice this stuff for a living). |
|
^+1 for 20kn. |