|
Tim Farkas
·
Jun 26, 2013
·
Albuquerque, NM
· Joined Jun 2011
· Points: 545
The Black Diamond ATC Guide is a near-essential, ever-popular piece of gear designed for multi-pitch rock climbing. When belaying a follower from above, one can easily belay off an anchor, rather than the body, by using "guide mode", increasing safety and comfort. One excellent feature of guide mode is that the ATC acts as an auto-locking belay device. It works because the device is oriented such that the climbing strands cinch down on the belay strands when loaded, halting downward movement. Here I report a failure of this auto-locking feature when used with thin ropes. -- I was recently belaying a follower from above using a Black Diamond ATC Guide in guide mode. We were climbing on two 7.8 mm half ropes. My follower fell, and instead of the climbing strands cinching down on top of the belay strands, they fell next to the belay strands in the cage of the ATC, and began to slip, slowly lowering the climber. I tried to brake the device, but this is actually difficult and awkward, since the brake direction in guide-mode would be into the wall. Fortunately, the slippage was minimal, and simply pulling hard on the brake strand was enough, combined with the friction between the ropes, to halt downward digression. Nevertheless, this was a fairly scary experience, since I was unsure what was going to happen. Of course, 7.8 mm is towards the thinnest dynamic rope available, but the technical specifications for the Black Diamond ATC Guide indicate that the minimal rope diameter for safe use is 7.7 mm. Thus, I argue that this was proper use of the gear, and warn of this potential safety issue. One possibility is that my specific ATC is worn from years of use, and thus the minimum rope diameter safely useable in guide mode has increased since it was purchased, but it is only a few years old and has a common amount of wear. Bottom line: If you’re belaying in guide-mode with double or twin ropes, best keep the diameter at 8.0 mm or above, but I’m just pulling that number out of nowhere. This issue should be tested. I also do not know anything about other “guiding” belay devices, such as the Petzl Reverso – these too should be tested. Furthermore, if anybody has any suggestions for how to increase safety with thin ropes, please comment.
|
|
divnamite
·
Jun 26, 2013
·
New York, NY
· Joined Aug 2007
· Points: 90
Which locking biner did you use for the belay? I've always use two locking biners for belay biner or rappel to provide more friction.
|
|
Cor
·
Jun 26, 2013
·
Sandbagging since 1989
· Joined Mar 2006
· Points: 1,445
Was the rope running straight down below the device, or was it running off at an angle? (Last piece of gear off to the side some...) The device will slip, and not totally auto lock if that is the case. (This has been a known fact for some time. So always keep hands on the lines...)
|
|
bearbreeder
·
Jun 26, 2013
·
Unknown Hometown
· Joined Mar 2009
· Points: 3,065
its a known issue ... when it happens the device usually seizes up and is a biatch to unlock and yes the belay device "should" be replaced when the groves are worn out, for thinner ropes anyways with single ropes its not an issue theres a reason that the mammut alpine smart comes in a version just for twins/doubles there is no real device that can handle any diameter reliably and smoothly from 7.7mm-10.5mm ... despite the propaganda from BD/PETZL/etc ... for thinner ropes the reverso 3/4 works better ... for thicker ropes the ATC guide is smoother its all a tradeoff ;)
|
|
Tim Farkas
·
Jun 26, 2013
·
Albuquerque, NM
· Joined Jun 2011
· Points: 545
divnamite wrote:Which locking biner did you use for the belay? I've always use two locking biners for belay biner or rappel to provide more friction. Cool tip. Thanks. Do both biners hold both ropes, or one rope per biner?
|
|
Tim Farkas
·
Jun 26, 2013
·
Albuquerque, NM
· Joined Jun 2011
· Points: 545
Cor wrote:Was the rope running straight down below the device, or was it running off at an angle? (Last piece of gear off to the side some...) The device will slip, and not totally auto lock if that is the case. (This has been a known fact for some time. So always keep hands on the lines...) Thanks for your reply. I do think that the ropes were running at a bit of an angle. Hadn't been warned of this before. Cheers.
|
|
Cor
·
Jun 26, 2013
·
Sandbagging since 1989
· Joined Mar 2006
· Points: 1,445
You had better read the instructions on your device!! WTF? 1 large locker. I don't want to hear about you getting hurt! :)
|
|
Tim Farkas
·
Jun 26, 2013
·
Albuquerque, NM
· Joined Jun 2011
· Points: 545
bearbreeder wrote:its a known issue ... when it happens the device usually seizes up and is a biatch to unlock and yes the belay device "should" be replaced when the groves are worn out, for thinner ropes anyways with single ropes its not an issue theres a reason that the mammut alpine smart comes in a version just for twins/doubles there is no real device that can handle any diameter reliably and smoothly from 7.7mm-10.5mm ... despite the propaganda from BD/PETZL/etc ... for thinner ropes the reverso 3/4 works better ... for thicker ropes the ATC guide is smoother its all a tradeoff ;) Thanks. I'll check out these other devices.
|
|
chris21
·
Jun 26, 2013
·
Unknown Hometown
· Joined Apr 2009
· Points: 125
I use a madrock madlock belay device it has a removable pin for use with double or twin ropes to create a tighter bend in the rope for more friction with the smaller diameter ropes. I keep the pin in the zipper pocket of my chalkbag when using single ropes.
|
|
Gunkiemike
·
Jun 26, 2013
·
Unknown Hometown
· Joined Jul 2009
· Points: 3,687
Dang Farkas, first you nearly rap to your death, now this? You better get your sh:t together. (and I mean that in the most positive, loving way!)
|
|
ROC
·
Jun 26, 2013
·
Denver, CO
· Joined Feb 2003
· Points: 155
This scenario is even worse with the new Reverso. There is a groove cut out of the sides of the Reverso which allow the ropes to slide to the side of the device and not directly on the break strand. Not sure if I am explaining it clearly here. I actually had a 10.2 invert in one of those things when I was using it to ascend. Nothing like switching from ascending to rappelling in a split second.
|
|
Benjamin Chapman
·
Jun 27, 2013
·
Small Town, USA
· Joined Jan 2007
· Points: 19,579
farkas.time......I think, from your response, that you may have misinterpreted divnamite's suggestion regarding the use of two locking carabiners to belay. By doubling or even tripling the locking carabiners the resulting additional surface area greatly increases the friction and thus the control of the belay.
|
|
jay123
·
Jun 27, 2013
·
Unknown Hometown
· Joined Oct 2011
· Points: 0
the double biner belay technique is also good for a light person belaying a heavy person
|
|
Morgan Patterson
·
Jun 27, 2013
·
NH
· Joined Oct 2009
· Points: 8,960
I've had this same creep with a 9.8 sterling velocity dry treated... it was the dry treat but it freaked the hell outta me when I couldn't actually stop when I was rapping.
|
|
Cor
·
Jun 27, 2013
·
Sandbagging since 1989
· Joined Mar 2006
· Points: 1,445
something is fundamentally wrong if you can't stop while you rap...
|
|
cfuttner
·
Jun 27, 2013
·
Chicago, IL
· Joined Apr 2012
· Points: 5
Spent a weekend climbing at Laurel Knob on a buddy's 7.8's with an ATC guide and BD gridlock. Used an old petzl atache spin ball (large diameter) through the loop. Not sure if this is a better combination than what you used but I didn't have any problems. Rapping on the other hand was scary slick.
|
|
W L
·
Jun 27, 2013
·
NEVADASTAN
· Joined Mar 2010
· Points: 851
Regularly use PMI Verglass 8.1 twins with my ATC Guide and any number of lockers and have yet to experience such a problem. YGD!!!!
|
|
Gunkiemike
·
Jun 28, 2013
·
Unknown Hometown
· Joined Jul 2009
· Points: 3,687
CaptainMo wrote:I've had this same creep with a 9.8 sterling velocity dry treated... it was the dry treat but it freaked the hell outta me when I couldn't actually stop when I was rapping. How does the "autoblock mode" of these new devices, and specifically slippage of one strand over/past the other, relate to rapping?
|
|
Brendan Blanchard
·
Jun 28, 2013
·
Boulder, CO
· Joined Oct 2010
· Points: 590
I'd say this had to be a special circumstance regarding the rope being pulled sideways during the auto-lock. I've experimented a little with a 7mm accessory cord and an ATC Guide, never in a real scenario, but I played around with and jump/fell onto it. It locked every time, no problem.
|
|
Morgan Patterson
·
Jun 28, 2013
·
NH
· Joined Oct 2009
· Points: 8,960
Gunkiemike wrote: How does the "autoblock mode" of these new devices, and specifically slippage of one strand over/past the other, relate to rapping? Slippage rapping vs slippage in autolock belay mode. . . Both devices should be locked off but still the ropes are creeping through the device. The correlation isn't obvious? Slippage. In my case Sterling said it was normal and just the dry. Seriously wigged me out...
|
|
Jim Titt
·
Jun 28, 2013
·
Germany
· Joined Nov 2009
· Points: 490
CaptainMo wrote: Slippage rapping vs slippage in autolock belay mode. . . Both devices should be locked off but still the ropes are creeping through the device. The correlation isn't obvious? Slippage. In my case Sterling said it was normal and just the dry. Seriously wigged me out... Two different things, if you haven´t enough braking power when abseiling then the ropes are too thin or you are too fat. In autobloc mode the ropes pass each other inside the device (they exchange their relative positions) and they don´t autobloc any more though the problem is still the ropes are too thin or the load was too high. I´ve posted the pull test results for the ATC Guide and Reverso³ previously, while Patzl highlight the limitations of their device in autobloc mode Black Diamond don´t seem to care enough about their customers to bother.
|