Quick Links
|
Does anyone know of any quick link failures? What size do most of you feel comfortable with? Whenever I buy them, I get the 2200 lb strength. However, I see the 800 lb and 1500 lb strength size occasionally as well. What are your thoughts on what should be used, and what is just plain dangerous? It seems like the forces on rappel at an anchor could relatively easily get above some of the strength ratings for the smaller quick links. Thoughts? |
|
John, |
|
I'd be extremely wary of using any size quick link unless it has been manufactured by a reputable company that is willing to stamp its own name on to each unit. Ron Olsen wrote:Note that this differs from how carabiners are rated (guaranteed ultimate breaking strength).That's a very good point to emphasize about climbing gear (carabiners, protection, rope). The ratings listed usually have a design factor of 1:1. John |
|
John J. Glime wrote:Does anyone know of any quick link failures? What size do most of you feel comfortable with? Whenever I buy them, I get the 2200 lb strength. However, I see the 800 lb and 1500 lb strength size occasionally as well. What are your thoughts on what should be used, and what is just plain dangerous? It seems like the forces on rappel at an anchor could relatively easily get above some of the strength ratings for the smaller quick links. Thoughts?Never heard of one failing. I usually go with the 5/16" size as a minimum, but, more commonly (and because they're required at some areas for new routes) 3/8" or 10mm. A friend used the 1/4"-ers all the time, which I didn't like 'cause they're teeny and they only seem to work well with skinny (ie, 8mm) rope. He tested two "made in China" ones to failure. They both broke at over 6000 lbs, within about 20 pounds of each other. I don't worry as much about what is stamped on the unit. It's the rod stock size I'm most interested in. At 3/8", most steel rod stock would be plenty strong. I'm not sure even the Maillon Rapide folks do much inspection or load testing on their units (or any? Anyone know?). Funkness test might work if you're worried about gross manufacturing defects. Found a bunch for a buck per. From 3/8" to 9/16". Makes it easy to use as "leavers" instead of a biner... |
|
Thanks guys. I had no idea about the working load being different from the breaking strength. That is good to know. Cheers. |
|
Brian in SLC wrote: Found a bunch for a buck per. From 3/8" to 9/16". Makes it easy to use as "leavers" instead of a biner... But we just don't do that anymore. |
|
The biggest issue with weaker quicklinks is the opening and bar diameter are smaller which makes a tighter bend on the rope (can make flat spots) and can make it harder to pull from the added friction. 8mm (roughly 5/16") is the smallest I'd use for the above reasons (fine for bailing) but 10mm (or 3/8") are much better for more permanent anchors as the rope pulls the best. |