The Complete History of Rock Climbing

Former writing teacher here. Thanks for sharing. As far as constructive criticism goes, I would comment that the frequent use of bold derails my reading rhythm and makes me want to skim your content. Perhaps utilize it in headings only?

My other reaction was that your article covers a lot of ground that isn't directly salient to the history of rock climbing. Perhaps move the mountaineering vs. rock climbing section to its own article?

I would second previous commenters' suggestion to rename the article to something besides "complete."

Lastly, I commend your bravery in opening up your work to the criticism of the masses. Hopefully you glean some helpful feedback. Keep writing and revising!

Jim Titt wrote:

You can add "written by an American".

HA!

Where’s the section on Tradiban?

Looks like I've got my work cut out for me. Thanks to all who provided actionable feedback! 

Not bad, seems like something suited for 6th grade social studies class.  (not an insult.  I like the simplicity and easy reading nature of it).

saxonguy wrote:

That is very well, but over here in saxony the ascent of the Falkenstein in 1864 is considered the "first one to satisfy the requirements of doing a rock climb just for the modern reasons of doing a rock climb - because it's there basically" whereas i had never heard of Hasket-Smith before in my live.  And as i said, i don't know whether this was the first such ascent, there may have been earlier ones i don't know about, but (not to start a debate) it happened 22 years before Hasket-Smith's climb.

Are you in Saxony now? I would really like to go climb the Falkenstein if you are up for it. Have done some leading but mostly Alter Wegs!