Momentum Climbing Accident - Utah
|
Either way, suing on of the best climbing gyms is a terrible idea! |
|
i have had quite a few of the employees be complete assholes to me there, i wasn't doing anything wrong all i wanted to do was take a lead test( it took me over 5 visits there to finally find someone who had the whole 10 mins it took to give the test) and i ran across many times to where i try to say hello or have a conversation with the employees and have been treated as if i wasn't good enough to be graced with presences. its really unfortunate because i love momentum, the gym is amazing the people who go there are awesome, i just feel that in the past year or so in particular, some ego's have been formed. |
|
shit I went there after they first opened and had some kid 20 years my junior come over and start giving my buddy a firemans belay because my brake hand was turned the wrong way. I wouldnt call the kid an asshole but more like the power hungry patrol kid on the bus in elementary school. |
|
How dare someone sue a climbing gym. .. heresey! |
|
I feel it's the responsibility of BOTH the climber AND their partner(s) to check each others rigs out before even starting to climb. My partners and I routinely ALWAYS check each others knots, harness buckles and such even before commencing. We feel that what good partners DO! |
|
One can sue mcDonalds over coffee in the this country and win, yet people are shocked and appalled that one would sue a climbing gym. |
|
Not sure why everyone is up in arms about a lawsuit. Tort law exists for a reason. If the courts decide that momentum was not negligent then she won't get any money. If momentum was negligent, she should be compensated for damages. Fall Guy wrote:zoso has never been a shit talker.Ha, he's always been a shit talker, but not a liar David Sahalie wrote:One can sue mcDonalds over coffee in the this countryMcDonald's got what was coming to them |
|
Allen Sanderson wrote: My comment was more of a general comment not specific to this case. As I wrote this incident was just one of many that have occurred over the past couple of years - not just with climbers but with others. The bottom line is that the activity was a recreational. I would not call it a freak accident. It was a fubar plain and simple. A freak accident is being stuck by lightening or being hit by rock fall. I took a bad fall when I first started climbing. It was not an accident, I fubar'ed. Fortunately, I walked away hamburger elbows. More over my parents knew I fubar'ed and made sure it did not reflect negatively on our climbing club."You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means" (Fubar = F*cked up beyond all recognition" |
|
Rope knots do not magically untie , she tied her knot incorrectly and paid the penalty for that.Really quite silly, lets just hope this incident keeps more knuckleheads from bringing harm to themselves. |
|
matt davies wrote: Sweet! I can't help it, I was raised by a Rolls-Royce Speak and Spell. As regards Mr. Ted's argument, it does no favor to its persuasiveness to exemplify observations made under physical duress to bolster a screed about the essence of human fallibility. I concede that it is not a negation, rather just a weak point. And I will further concede that my presentation of criticism of Mr. Ted's post using debate formality as a cursory template was a poor attempt at satire of an on-line row about climbing that has clearly devolved into the absurd. Not my best work. Thank you for taking my post seriously enough to register and call me a douche under a devilishly clever phony name. Also, thank you for taking the time to peruse my library of overtly pretentious remarks. Welcome to Mountain Project! EDIT: Douche toolery is my speciality, and you should really conjure a more varied lexicon of insults to affront me with. youtube.com/watch?v=ylI86Nh…Matt you have far too much time on your hands lad, ever thought about a hobby?Maybe u should start climbing. |
|
"If the courts decide that momentum was not negligent then she won't get any money." and the gym will have to pay a much higher liability insurance premium regardless of fault. |
|
John D wrote: "You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means" (Fubar = F*cked up beyond all recognition"I do know what it means - it came out of WWII along with SNAFU, and few others. Further the "all recognition" can be substituted with "any reasoning", "all repair", or other variants. So incorrectly tying a knot, not checking it, and then cratering is fucked up beyond any reasoning. Christian wrote:"If the courts decide that momentum was not negligent then she won't get any money." and the gym will have to pay a much higher liability insurance premium regardless of fault. fixed that for youLet me correct your correction: "If the courts decide that momentum was not negligent then she won't get any money." and the gym will have to pay a much higher liability insurance premium regardless of fault. Which in turn will increase your membership cost while forcing you to pass a knot/belay competency test with each visit. |
|
Does anyone know for certain that she is suing Momentum? |
|
are we gonna have to climb with double ropes in the gym?? Awesome. |
|
Maybe the reason behind the lawsuit is to hope that Momentum settles and she recoups some of her medical bills? Not saying I agree with it, but could be the tactic. Desperate times lead to desperate measures. |
|
"Does bankruptcy provide relief from medical bills? " |
|
builttospill wrote:"Does bankruptcy provide relief from medical bills? " Yes, it does. Unequivocally. Medical bills are a leading cause of bankruptcy in the U.S.She'll still owe her school loans, unfortunately. Maybe she could sue scantron though. |
|
Colonel Mustard wrote: She'll still owe her school loans, unfortunately. Maybe she could sue scantron though.Lmfao!!!! |
|
Shane Neal wrote: Lmfao!!!!That is a great idea! Class action anyone? |
|
If this somehow affects the construction of the new Momentum II - I am gonna be pissed. Blanket party will be in order... |