Winky and Waxman Go Bolting 5.11b
| 3,590 page views Good page?  |
| Type: | Sport, 1 pitch, 30 feet |
| Consensus: | 5.10d [details] |
| FA: | Merill Bitter, Robyn Waxman 1987 |
| Submitted By: | Nathan Fisher on Jun 18, 2003 |
| |
Rick going for the lip.
Add Photo Printer View
Description This is the short (3 bolt) problem on the west face, just past the pine tree. It protects well, and is a pump. On my first ascent, I almost couldn't open the draws at the top for the chains. Stay out of the crack to the right, and expect rock-solid forearms when you are done.
Protection 2 bolts atop, and 3 draws on the lead. A 5.4 scramble up the left-facing corner to the left will get you atop for the top-rope. But.... go for the lead, it is well worth it, and because of the nature of the rock, a fall is fun.
Midway up the climb. This was Adam's 1st 5.11.
| BETA PHOTO: Loose Hold. Take Care.
| Having a devil of a time clipping that 3rd bolt.
| Near the finish.
| A noble attempt on a lead deserves a noble reward
| Pulling the top.
| Midway up
| | |
| Comments on Winky and Waxman Go Bolting |
|
By Nathan Fisher Apr 11, 2004
| Just went up and did it again today. Be aware that the last left handhold, before the ledge is suspect. It seemed solid enough to me, but it is definitely loose. |
By Matt Barrigar Aug 12, 2004 rating: 5.11a
| Feels like an 11a - because it is so short. Any idea if there is a rating on the v scale? |
By Nathan Fisher Sep 28, 2005
| I heard that the "hold" is gone, but no more difficult. |
By Anonymous Coward Oct 13, 2005
| led it last night ... the "hold" is still there and feels the same as it did 2 years ago ... from what i remember |
By glen kaplan From: Salt Lake City, UT Oct 24, 2006 rating: 5.10c
| that 'hold' is still there and will probably be there for a good while... just cause it is shaky doesn't mean everyone has to get all puckered... hell, you might as well use it as a high left foot too! |
By oliver Jun 5, 2007
| I would have a hard time calling that a 5.11 I would say the rating is around a 10c. Better rated as a boulder problem at V1. However rated though it is a enjoyable little problem to get on. |
By icsteveoh From: salt lake city, UT Jun 13, 2007 rating: 5.10b/c
| Bolt #3 is a bit loose on this guy. |
By Ryan Peterson From: North Salt Lake, Utah Jun 30, 2007
| Didn't seem too tough to me, third bolt is a spinner though, and I used that loose rock for a hold and it seemed fine. Lost it at the top my first try, but mantled the second try and made it up. That mantle at the top makes it all worth it, great climb. |
By Michael MacFadden Aug 27, 2007 rating: 5.11a
| For those who think this is rated harder than it is, there are a bunch of chalk marks in the crack off to the right of the bolt line. If you use either the crack or the rock face to the right this climb is more like an 8. If you do the sit start and climb the bolt line (as if you were leading) and stay out of the crack it definitely feels like 5.11 moves. Sure its short, but if you had a sustained 5.9 with this section, it would definitely be rated an 11. |
By john richards From: salt lake city UT Apr 21, 2008 rating: 5.10c
| I have a hard time calling this more than a 10c. dont get me wrong though FUN FUN FUN. skip the first bolt. If you fall above it your gonna hit the deck anyway. |
By McRae Williams May 15, 2008 rating: 5.11a
| Fun short climb. Worth a run up. Not quite 11b, in my opinion it is a highball V2. Regardless, it is a fun little route. |
By WasatchChic From: Salt Lake, Utah Aug 6, 2008 rating: 5.10d
| We usually link the Winky and Waxman line with the newer (meaning not in the guide)5.10'ish long line next to it. Anyone know if this has a name? |
By icsteveoh From: salt lake city, UT Oct 24, 2008 rating: 5.10b/c
| OOOOOOH BOY. As of 10/24/08 the cool block that's loose is dead. Makes for a bit harder of a topout but geeze... that hold gave that route character. I'm bummed. |
By David Shiembob From: slc, ut Oct 28, 2008
| yeah, I couldn't believe the block is gone, the hole where it was is a big hold now, so it didn't seem any harder. |
By Riddler From: Centerville, UT Nov 14, 2008
| This is a pretty reasonable highball boulder problem, especially since you can get it wired on a rope first. Watch out for the back-breaking boulder at the bottom! |
By Ty Meadows From: Moab, UT Jun 29, 2009
| A scrimage heros' climb |
By Mike Minson From: Boulder, CO Oct 2, 2010 rating: 5.11-
| V3 boulder problem if you sit start |
By Boissal From: Small Lake, UT Oct 2, 2010
| V4 if you gaston L hand instead of going to the jug. Sit start on routes: so hot right now... |
By Peter Hayes Jul 22, 2012
| Referring to the '92 Ruckman guide, this route had a single bolt when it was first established, and the beta called for a hand full of RP's to protect. I'd suggest that one needs to try the ground-up onsight with this in mind to grasp the meaning of the original .11b rating. The "second" bolt was the original. As it stands today (easy protection), and in comparison to the other 11's nearby, I think the route is more in the .10c range, especially once one has the beta sussed. For a grade comparison, head over to the S-Curves and do "Black Monday", because that to me is benchmark for a BCC .11a. Just getting past the first bolt on that route has harder moves than anything on "Winky & Waxman Go Bolting"...that is, if you do not do the route as it was first done... |
By zenetopia Sep 18, 2012
| There isn't a v3, let alone v4, move on this little line. Even on sit start (& not using the right corner)nothing is much harder then v1. Pretty fun to finish up the day though. |
By Boissal From: Small Lake, UT Sep 18, 2012
| Time to update my previous comment: Sit start eliminate on routes: so hot right now... You should go add a sit start to Condor in Ferguson. At least 6 people would downgrade it and/or shit a brick. |
By Tyler N From: Salt Lake City, Utah Jan 23, 2013 rating: 5.11b
| There's absolutely a V2/V3 move on this route (you just have to make sure not to go right). Very contrived but enjoyable. Essentially just a highball. |
|