Who uses a grigri to belay trad leaders?
|
Who uses a grigri to belay trad leaders and why? Who doesn't and why? Has anyone here had a piece of pro fail due to shock-load that they attributed to the gri gri? |
|
Lorenzo Tragen wrote:Who uses a grigri to belay trad leaders and why? Who doesn't and why? Has anyone here had a piece of pro fail due to shock-load that they attributed to the gri gri?Lorenzo, I've recently started belaying the leader on my Cinch (does that count?). Used to always use my Reverso, but I like the autolock feature of the Cinch. My friend took a 15-20 foot lead fall on a smallish cam and it held fine. I think the dynamic rope provides enough stretch to keep the shock load reasonable while using the Cinch. And if I have the presence of mind to step up ("soft catch"), I'll do that, too. |
|
I use one all the time. Just think about giving a soft catch and standing in an active position and I doubt the forces would be any higher than with an ATC. I use one because it means that if something bad happens above me (Like my leader trundling some large rock) and I take a blow to the head and get knocked out I don't drop my partner. Even if I'm incapacitated my partner stands a chance of rescuing me. That being said I climb in a lot of places with scree (Alaska rock ftw!) and in an alpine environment. |
|
Yep, I use a Grigri the majority of the time. The only real downside is the weight! |
|
been doing it for 15 years. Almost positive it hasn't caused any gear failures. |
|
Nope. The Gri is a great belay for trad leading. |
|
I use a gri gri almost exclusively for trad belaying, both multipitch and cragging. Never had a piece fail from shock loading. You should know how to give dynamic soft catches with a gri gri anyway, so if you are worried about a gri gri shock loading trad gear, yore doing it rong. |
|
I belay with a Grigri almost exclusively, and I prefer to be belayed with one as long as the belayer knows how to use it correctly. |
|
I never use atc's to belay. A gri gri or any other auto locker is a better option for climbing because on large falls where the belayer gets pulled a long distance up the rock there is always a chance he can lose a hand on the belay device from being pushed or slammed into something. The rope is dynamic and your belayer will also slow you down as he is pulled to you. |
|
I belay leaders (and TR) exclusively with my Reverso 3. I have a Grigri I use for setting in the gym, but I'd hate to use one for lead-belay duties. |
|
I like to belay with a gri-gri on trad routes and I LOVE when my belayer is using one as well. I climb primarily in Zion np and constantly deal with loose rock on both established routes and new routing. I am much more concerned about hitting my belayer with rock and having the belay compromised than getting a "soft" catch. If your gear is gonna rip, likely it will be a placement or rock quality issue, not how soft your belay was. I use it single and multipitch climbing and couldn't live without it when Wallin'. If it is easy climbing where the leader is moving FAST I still use an ATC, muenter, or hip belay. |
|
Cinch is the way to go. I use it for lead belay and TR exclusively. I only use an atc guide for multipitch. |
|
I have always used an ATC for trad and a GriGri (or Cinch) for sport. |
|
Peter Franzen wrote:I belay with a Grigri almost exclusively, and I prefer to be belayed with one as long as the belayer knows how to use it correctly.+1 |
|
GriGri is fine to use, but requires you to bring an extra rap device. If you don't want to carry the extra weight bring an atc. If you really care about the auto-lock function of the GriGri but hate the weight, carry a Mammut Smart Alpine. It does everything a GriGri does plus you can do more. It also gives more of a dynamic belay than a GriGri (it is also half the price). |
|
NC Rock Climber wrote:I have always used an ATC for trad and a GriGri (or Cinch) for sport. I was under the impression that the slip that you got with the ATC reduced the impact force on your gear. After seeing this thread, I did a search and couldn't find any data to support that. I am curious if anyone has any data that shows how different belay devices can change impact force.Anecdotal "It's held fine for me" doesn't change the fact that a GriGri will provide a HARDER catch than an ATC type device. So there are trade offs regardless of what people say. Does it matter most of the time? PRobably not and the benefits of a GriGri might certainly outweigh the higher impact force it will impart. I personally don't care if the route takes a wide variety of gear. I WILL care however, when the route calls for lots of small wires or cams, especially close to the ground where the fall forces will be higher and the consequences of gear failure higher as well. Scroll down and pay particular attention to example 1. That's where I'm most concerned (short rope, close to ground etc). You can bust small wires with those falls and that 3kN or more difference might BE the difference between a hold and a deck. Beal ATC vs GriGri impact forces |
|
NC Rock Climber wrote:I have always used an ATC for trad and a GriGri (or Cinch) for sport. I was under the impression that the slip that you got with the ATC reduced the impact force on your gear. After seeing this thread, I did a search and couldn't find any data to support that. I am curious if anyone has any data that shows how different belay devices can change impact force.Hey NC, I measured this with a dynamometer and found a higher impact force with a GriGri than an ATC. I also found the Beal article posted above. The differences that I saw were enough to make me ask for an ATC belay on trad routes when the gear is shaky (by this I mean poor gear or gear with lower ratings such as <=4kN). Ultimately people need to choose what they are comfortable with, but I think there is an advantage to using the ATC for gear routes. |
|
Thanks Geir and Mattm. That is good information. If I am reading the Beal data correctly, some of the GriGri Impact force #s are 50% greater than the ATC type devices. To me, that is significant. |
|
DBarton wrote:GriGri is fine to use, but requires you to bring an extra rap device.And why cant you rap with a grigri??? |
|
I use both the Smart and Grigri. My impression holding gym lead falls is that the Smart is a softer catch. |
|
NC Rock Climber wrote:Thanks Geir and Mattm. That is good information. If I am reading the Beal data correctly, some of the GriGri Impact force #s are 50% greater than the ATC type devices. To me, that is significant. It would be interesting to see how the Mammut Smart and the GriGri 2, both of which reputedly have a softer catch, would do in a similar test.Not aware of the GriGri 2 having a softer catch. I do believe there's some rope slip and thus a softer catch with the smart... |