Mountain Project Logo

Where would you go?

Original Post
Brian Hudson · · Jasper, TN · Joined Dec 2010 · Points: 95

The only place in the continental US I've grown up and lived is in the southeast...you know, where the best climbing is this side of the mason-dixon and where you can buy guns, beer, bread, and fireworks in the same store. I've recently decided that I would like color TV and to marry someone I'm not related to, so I'm looking around for a new place to live. I have an opportunity to relocate to one of the below locations in the next few months. All other cultural and political factors aside, which would you choose for a climbing destination?

Groton, CT
Portsmouth, NH
Norfolk, VA
Bremerton, WA
San Diego, CA
Kings Bay, GA

(yes, these are Navy ports...)

Pitty · · Marbach · Joined Apr 2011 · Points: 50

San Diego - for the Yosemite, Josua Tree and Red Rocks....all of them not too far away.

Anonymous · · Unknown Hometown · Joined unknown · Points: 0

DO NOT GO TO GROTON CT ITS FULL OF DUNGEONS AND DRAGONS PLAYING SUBMARINERS

ITS LIKE HARRY POTTER AND DAHMER HAD 5000 BABIES

sorry if you are a submariner

Brian Hudson · · Jasper, TN · Joined Dec 2010 · Points: 95
Pitty wrote:San Diego - for the Yosemite, Josua Tree and Red Rocks....all of them not too far away.
San Diego is high on my list for sure...
Brian Hudson · · Jasper, TN · Joined Dec 2010 · Points: 95
thefish wrote:DO NOT GO TO GROTON CT ITS FULL OF DUNGEONS AND DRAGONS PLAYING SUBMARINERS ITS LIKE HARRY POTTER AND DAHMER HAD 5000 BABIES
hahahaha

damn submariners
Kyle Pease · · Back in Missoula · Joined Apr 2011 · Points: 45

don't even consider the 4th one on your list

Gunkiemike · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Jul 2009 · Points: 3,492
Pitty wrote:San Diego - for the Yosemite, Josua Tree and Red Rocks....all of them not too far away.
The western perspective on proximity always causes me to chuckle. San Diego --> Yosemite is 8 hr or more (per nps.gov). Totally justified by the climbing there of course, but still a big drive IMO.
Pitty · · Marbach · Joined Apr 2011 · Points: 50
Gunkiemike wrote: The western perspective on proximity always causes me to chuckle. San Diego --> Yosemite is 8 hr or more (per nps.gov). Totally justified by the climbing there of course, but still a big drive IMO.
it is 370 Miles..... ok, too short for the evening but for the weekend? why not...
Brian Hudson · · Jasper, TN · Joined Dec 2010 · Points: 95
thefish wrote:you know its true! now that we've established that you are in the navy, what's your job?
I was a submariner for 10 years. Been out since last January and considering going back in.

I would also consider 8 hours to be a fairly short drive, well worth doing for a 3-day weekend.
MTKirk · · Billings, MT · Joined Dec 2011 · Points: 245

No doubt about it, absolutely has to be San Diego. Besides fairly good climbing close by the Surfing is amazing, if you don't yet know how it's time to learn!

JCM · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Jun 2008 · Points: 115
Pitty wrote:it is 370 Miles..... ok, too short for the evening but for the weekend? why not...
Brian Hudson wrote: I would also consider 8 hours to be a fairly short drive, well worth doing for a 3-day weekend.
Ha! Some people (especially Californians) are insane when it comes to driving. Still, San Diego has a lot going for it as a city, has close access to some decent climbing, and not-close-but-still-manageable access to great climbing.

That said, the "it absolutely has to be San Diego" answer is silly; some of the other areas have a lot going for them too. Specifically, Portsmouth, NH also has some good things to offer. Decently close to North Conway, Rumney, Pawtuckaway, Shagg, etc. It isn't California, but that may be a good thing; it really depends on which culture/landscape/climate suits you.

Bremerton, WA is a beautiful place, and the PNW has tons of great climbing and big mountains. Unfortunately, Bremerton is located on the wrong side of the Puget Sounds from all of the good (rock) climbing, making access to said climbing a massive nuisance. Quite unfortunate, really.

Groton might be tolerable, from a climbing perspective, but not ideal. While CT does have some climbing (Traprock toproping, generally), and the Gunks are not terribly far, I would choose one of the other areas first, if possible.

Avoid Norfolk and Kings Bay at all costs; no climbing near any of them.
Ryan Williams · · London (sort of) · Joined May 2009 · Points: 1,245

I'd stay where you are. None of those places seem appealing to me at all with the exception of San Diego.

Superclimber · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Mar 2009 · Points: 1,310

If you can put up with the California cost of living and taxes, then the west coast seems like a no brainer.

frankstoneline · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Apr 2009 · Points: 30

Bremerton is 4 hours from squamish, a ferry ride from seattle (good gyms) and has a gym of it's own i think, about 90 minutes from little si, couple hours to leavenworth/goldbar bouldering.

JJNS · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Sep 2008 · Points: 531

+1 for Portsmouth, 2nd place Washington, 3rd place San Diego

Brian E · · Western North Carolina · Joined Mar 2005 · Points: 363

WA has a short climbing season because it rains a lot. People that live there will tell you otherwise, but they are wrong. It rains a lot, and they basically only have one good trad crag; Index. It rains a lot at Index.

Dan Felix · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Aug 2012 · Points: 35

Portsmouth has a lot to offer, as has been mentioned. Just don't try to get out of work early by setting a fire and all will be good!

To add to the Portsmouth list just a bit, there is a ton of new climbing opening up less than an hour from there in New Durham. Acadia NP in Maine is also a 3-4 hour drive as well. The downside is housing is expensive, but if you can live on base or out of Portsmouth town its better. My girlfriend is from Portsmouth and I spent a significant amount of time there last summer for work so I am somewhat familiar with the area.

mitchy B · · nunya gotdamn business. · Joined Aug 2009 · Points: 0

Forget about Groton, there is nothing near there to brag about. Lantern hill and Ragged mtn are close by but, i would go to Portsmouth if i were you, way more things to do. The whole Maine coast is kickass, great for kayaking, white mtns aren't that far away, Baxter state park is sorta close, Acadia National park is 3-4 hrs away effing beautiful place been there 4-5 times. Boston and providence are close as well, tons of shit to do around Portsmouth.

Mike Pharris · · Longmont, CO · Joined May 2007 · Points: 125

Nofolk and that whole area around it is a shithole.

Eamon Doyle · · Sierra Madre, CA · Joined Nov 2011 · Points: 5

San Diego is a great place to live and is within a few hours of good climbing. Also, we sell alcohol in the same store as the rest of the food here ;)

Brian Hudson · · Jasper, TN · Joined Dec 2010 · Points: 95
Dan Felix wrote:Just don't try to get out of work early by setting a fire and all will be good!
Sounds like a shipyard story!

Thanks for all the input, everybody. I appreciate it. I guess I'd say it's a toss-up between San Diego, Portsmouth, and Bremerton. San Diego does have a lot going for it and after the visit we made in '08 I said I'd probably enjoy being stationed there. I agree about Norfolk, although they have a nice gym in VA Beach and Richmond has a couple of tiny spots to climb. But way too far to the mountains.

Eamon...I definitely agree about alcohol being a food!
Guideline #1: Don't be a jerk.

General Climbing
Post a Reply to "Where would you go?"

Log In to Reply
Welcome

Join the Community

Create your FREE account today!
Already have an account? Login to close this notice.

Get Started