|
Ryan N
·
Jun 11, 2012
·
Bellingham, WA
· Joined May 2009
· Points: 195
What is more important to you? The weight saving factor, or the bulk factor? Is the weight of the pack, or the size of the pack more important. Not the pack it's self but the contents and volume. Any thoughts?
|
|
slk
·
Jun 11, 2012
·
Reno, NV
· Joined Jan 2011
· Points: 130
Ryan N wrote:What is more important to you? The weight saving factor, or the bulk factor? Is the weight of the pack, or the size of the pack more important. Not the pack it's self but the contents and volume. Any thoughts? Delete your other post ;)
|
|
John Hegyes
·
Jun 11, 2012
·
Las Vegas, NV
· Joined Feb 2002
· Points: 5,636
Weight is a more important factor to me, but if I'm climbing a tight chimney keeping things slimmed down is pretty crucial as well.
|
|
Ryan N
·
Jun 11, 2012
·
Bellingham, WA
· Joined May 2009
· Points: 195
|
|
Woodchuck ATC
·
Jun 11, 2012
·
Unknown Hometown
· Joined Nov 2007
· Points: 3,280
? ??? specify what pack you are talking about. A multi pitch climbing day pack? Seige alpine ascent with everything you need for life support? Solo route on anything? Winter conditions? Backpacking a mountain trail? Alot of options depending on what your goals are and where you are headed.
|
|
Chris Plesko
·
Jun 11, 2012
·
Westminster, CO
· Joined Oct 2007
· Points: 485
It depends but I generally won't squabble over ~1 lbs for a fast solo mission but I hate carrying a big ass pack even if it's light. Then again I slept on 1/8" closed cell foam for 3 weeks and I'd do it again too. It was light and small, haha.
|
|
Simon Thompson
·
Jun 19, 2012
·
New Paltz, NY
· Joined Apr 2011
· Points: 890
Totally depends on the content and intensity of the trip. For climbing I always try to keep the pack small even if it's heavy(ropes and gear.) For backpacking the most important thing is that it's packed WELL. Regardless of how much it weighs it has to be properly packed and the weight distributed right so that you can comfortably carry it for a long time. If it comes down to bulk vs. weight, which it usually doesn't, I guess I would try to get weight down first and then work on bulk since ultimately the more weight you carry the more energy you spend carrying it.
|
|
Ryan N
·
Jun 19, 2012
·
Bellingham, WA
· Joined May 2009
· Points: 195
To clarify I'm talking about a Multi-day alpine climb. Really what sparked this question is the cooking aspect. Do we (2 of us) bring individual stoves which would be lighter, or go with a less efficient but more practical and bigger 1.5 liter cooking set-up? Obviously that would be more bulky trying to keep packs to 35 liters. I agree efficiency has alot to do with it.
|
|
Auto-X Fil
·
Jun 19, 2012
·
NEPA and Upper Jay, NY
· Joined Aug 2010
· Points: 50
On a climb where melting snow is your only source of water, and we can get snowed in for any amount of time, my partners and I will bring two Reactors. Part of it is the convenience, but it's nice to have the redundancy in case something gets dropped or broken. Bulk is rarely an issue for me.
|