Route Guide - iPhone / Android - Partners - Forum - Photos - Deals - What's New
Login with Facebook
 ADVANCED
What's more important?
View Latest Posts in This Forum or All Forums
   Page 1 of 1.  
Follow replies to this topic? Notify me at the top of web site.
1

Email me.
 
By Ryan N
From Lone Tree, Colorado
Jun 11, 2012
RJN

What is more important to you?

The weight saving factor, or the bulk factor? Is the weight of the pack, or the size of the pack more important. Not the pack it's self but the contents and volume. Any thoughts?


FLAG
By slk
From Reno, NV
Jun 11, 2012
me

Ryan N wrote:
What is more important to you? The weight saving factor, or the bulk factor? Is the weight of the pack, or the size of the pack more important. Not the pack it's self but the contents and volume. Any thoughts?


Delete your other post ;)


FLAG
By John Hegyes
From Las Vegas, NV
Jun 11, 2012
South of Windy Peak

Weight is a more important factor to me, but if I'm climbing a tight chimney keeping things slimmed down is pretty crucial as well.


FLAG
By Ryan N
From Lone Tree, Colorado
Jun 11, 2012
RJN

Bump for more input....


FLAG
By Woodchuck ATC
Jun 11, 2012
Rock Wars, RRG, 2008

? ??? specify what pack you are talking about. A multi pitch climbing day pack? Seige alpine ascent with everything you need for life support? Solo route on anything? Winter conditions? Backpacking a mountain trail? Alot of options depending on what your goals are and where you are headed.


FLAG
By Chris Plesko
From Westminster, CO
Jun 11, 2012
OMG, I winz!!!

It depends but I generally won't squabble over ~1 lbs for a fast solo mission but I hate carrying a big ass pack even if it's light. Then again I slept on 1/8" closed cell foam for 3 weeks and I'd do it again too. It was light and small, haha.


FLAG
By Simon Thompson
From New Paltz, NY
Jun 19, 2012
Photo by Tony Lopez

Totally depends on the content and intensity of the trip. For climbing I always try to keep the pack small even if it's heavy(ropes and gear.) For backpacking the most important thing is that it's packed WELL. Regardless of how much it weighs it has to be properly packed and the weight distributed right so that you can comfortably carry it for a long time.

If it comes down to bulk vs. weight, which it usually doesn't, I guess I would try to get weight down first and then work on bulk since ultimately the more weight you carry the more energy you spend carrying it.


FLAG
By Ryan N
From Lone Tree, Colorado
Jun 19, 2012
RJN

To clarify I'm talking about a Multi-day alpine climb. Really what sparked this question is the cooking aspect. Do we (2 of us) bring individual stoves which would be lighter, or go with a less efficient but more practical and bigger 1.5 liter cooking set-up? Obviously that would be more bulky trying to keep packs to 35 liters. I agree efficiency has alot to do with it.


FLAG
By Auto-X Fil
From NEPA and Upper Jay, NY
Jun 19, 2012

On a climb where melting snow is your only source of water, and we can get snowed in for any amount of time, my partners and I will bring two Reactors. Part of it is the convenience, but it's nice to have the redundancy in case something gets dropped or broken.

Bulk is rarely an issue for me.


FLAG


Follow replies to this topic? Notify me at the top of web site.
1

Email me.
Page 1 of 1.