Login with Facebook
 ADVANCED
Using a single strand of webbing for an anchor
View Latest Posts in This Forum or All Forums
Page 1 of 2.  1  2   Next>   Last>>
Follow replies to this topic? Notify me at the top of web site.
1

Email me.
 
Apr 14, 2013
I have only ever seen webbing used when it is looped with a water knot. What is to stop you from using it non-looped like one would use (or how I have seen used) a static rope or cordalette?

I guess this is a pretty broad question but for example if you were using two trees that are too big to sling. And maybe you only have enough webbing to extend over a cliff if you don't loop it.
anchor
anchor

Here there are any number of knots you can use to tie one end of the webbing around the tree. I was thinking a bowline or fig. 8 (or double versions of these-and with backup knots of course). Ex how the static rope is used here climbingtechniques.wordpress.c....

Would this be ok with webbing? My guess is that sure it is fine-though maybe not ideal. Why would looped webbing-ex a long runner be better? Just b/c force would be split between two strands? Is there any better way to do this (using just webbing)? Am I just being oblivious and people already do this?

I guess similarly if you wanted to make your own metolius equalizer metoliusclimbing.com/equalizer... you could just tie a knot at the end of 10' of webbing. Would this be safe? (I don't see why not). What knot would you use?
SLippy
Joined Mar 8, 2013
11 points
Apr 14, 2013
It really comes down to knowing the strength of the materials you are using, and whether or not it's redundant. 1" tubular webbing is rated for 4000lb (17.7KN). Less 30% for knots. Robert Cort
Joined Oct 12, 2009
804 points
Apr 14, 2013
Ok so after looking into it one reason why you might not want to do this is that webbing is much weaker than static rope. Ex

blue water webbing
9/16"- 9kN
1"-17.8kN

blue water assaultline static rope-36.58kN
PMI e-z bend static line-26.9kN

PMI 7mm cordalette-10.7kN
New England 7mm cord-10.2kN
PMI 6mm Cord-6.8kN
Blue water dyneema 5.5mm cord-13.7kN
PMI 8mm cord-14kN

so in reality you would probably be fine on a sing strand anchor using any of these- but i really would only feel comfortable on a single strand of static rope.
SLippy
Joined Mar 8, 2013
11 points
Apr 14, 2013
well robert got to it first SLippy
Joined Mar 8, 2013
11 points
Apr 14, 2013
You do not have redundancy at the clip-in point in the "anchor" illustration you posted. To make this anchor set-up redundant, simply tie two overhand bights side-by-side (aka "Rabbit Ears") and clip your two lockers into each of these. slevin
Joined Jan 1, 2001
1,048 points
Apr 14, 2013
climbing on an old dam
I don't have much authority on the subject but my first instinct is to avoid tying more knots than I have to. 1. because it increases the chance for human error and 2. knots will lower the strength of the webbing/rope/sling etc. My two cents. I'm more interested in seeing what others have to say Andrew Rivera
Joined Sep 3, 2011
34 points
Apr 14, 2013
good point didn't notice that SLippy
Joined Mar 8, 2013
11 points
Apr 14, 2013
first of all if your using webbing use a water knot, second what ever your wrapping the webbing around like a tree or boulder wrap it 2 or 3 times the friction from the wraps will be enough to take alot of the force off the knot. You probably dont wana use webbing for this kinda setup because top rope anchors gewt waited alot and have you ever tried to take a water knot out of webbing afdter youve waited it? and as for redundecy i guess two ropes are better than 1 but if your worried that your rope is gana cut or snap then why would you be doing it??? your rope or webbing is dynamic and can absorb force. it should be the strongest part of the system---(knots can absorb impact because some of the force from the fall gets taken into by the knot tightening on itself) Brasky
Joined Jul 9, 2012
1 points
Apr 14, 2013
well i wouldn't be able to tie a water knot b/c i am not tying it to the other end of the webbing-i am just tying one end to itself/around a tree.

and i am not worried about the webbing being cut-i am worried that the potential force would be too much for a single strand of webbing but it would be fine on a doubled strand like you would see in a runner.
SLippy
Joined Mar 8, 2013
11 points
Apr 14, 2013
I worry less about things breaking and more about anchors pulling out. I wouldn't worry at all with webbing tied to a BIG tree, one strand or not. What is the big load your fearing your anchor will take? Darby
From Snoqualmie, wa
Joined Feb 17, 2010
0 points
Apr 14, 2013
Awesome slab climb right out of the water! Rogers ...
I'd rather use a 50 ft length of 7/16" or 1/2" static rope myself for rigging anchors like that. Static rope is strong and I think easier to tie and untie knots in and of of after weighting it. NYClimber
From New York
Joined Jul 17, 2011
180 points
Apr 14, 2013
Rock Wars, RRG, 2008
Also the fact that you as a trad climber years ago, carried those web sections as pre tied loops around your neck or body. There was convenience in their assembly and readiness for looping or to tie off with a figure 8 from multiple point anchors. A long strand of web with a loop on each end was not practical to carry, and certainly too much work to untie the water knot and then retie 2 new ends up for such a setup. Woodchuck ATC
Joined Nov 29, 2007
3,090 points
Apr 14, 2013
Well toproping can generate pretty big forces. For ex. this rock and ice article says rockandice.com/lates-news/top-... up to 1500 lbs- which is almost 8kN-a bit too close for comfort for me to the breaking point of a thin piece of cordalette or webbing SLippy
Joined Mar 8, 2013
11 points
Apr 14, 2013
HangDoug
Joined May 18, 2012
15 points
Apr 14, 2013
I just wanted to chime in here real quick, the knot you should use IS the water knot. It is an overhand follow through. DO NOT just tie the webbing around itself. Tie an initial overhand knot, wrap around tree and then follow through the initial knot. Sorry if you know this but you mentioned you can't use the overhand knot so a red flag went up. cellige
Joined Dec 2, 2010
0 points
Apr 14, 2013
ok yeah guess you are right on the water knot. guess my mind isn't wired to think of it being tied that way SLippy
Joined Mar 8, 2013
11 points
Apr 14, 2013
so yeah tying and untying water knots would be a big pain- especially if they were weighted SLippy
Joined Mar 8, 2013
11 points
Apr 14, 2013
some other trust you life to what random people on the internet say sites seem to think that bowline on a bight and overhand on a bight are fine with webbing- which would make the setup more practical to setup and disassemble. thoughts?
canyoneeringusa.com/techtips/w...
forums.caves.org/viewtopic.php...
rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/forum...
SLippy
Joined Mar 8, 2013
11 points
Apr 14, 2013
it will work fine ... get full strength (20kn+) webbing, pad any sharp edges, and make sure the masterpoint aint rubbing against anything

ask yourself this ... how is it going to fail ... rather than asking about TR anchors on the intrawebs, which brings everyone out of the woodwork ;)
bearbreeder
Joined Mar 1, 2009
1,886 points
Apr 15, 2013
Mt Minsi, PA
my biggest fear with webbing is that it is not going to be as abrasion resistant as 7mm+ cord or static rope. and like most climbers, whenever I rap off of webbing I use two independent strands. the only time I've used webbing in a TR setup was if one of the trees I was using was WAY back and my static wouldn't be enough. but I've never had the master point be made from webbing, or extended webbing over an edge like I would with cord/static.

one thing I always do, and tell other climbers to do, is make sure the water knot's tails are several inches long AND to tie overhand knots in them. a study was done, and if the water knot slips the overhand knots prevent the tails from passing through.
Michael C
From New Jersey
Joined Jun 9, 2011
306 points
Administrator
Apr 15, 2013
A Very Not Snowy Christmas...
bearbreeder wrote:
it will work fine ... get full strength (20kn+) webbing, pad any sharp edges, and make sure the masterpoint aint rubbing against anything ask yourself this ... how is it going to fail ... rather than asking about TR anchors on the intrawebs, which brings everyone out of the woodwork ;)


+1 come to CT if you want to see examples of TR anchors with or without redundancy.
Morgan Patterson
Joined Oct 13, 2009
8,417 points
Apr 15, 2013
CoR
SLippy wrote:
I have only ever seen webbing used when it is looped with a water knot. What is to stop you from using it non-looped like one would use (or how I have seen used) a static rope or cordalette? What knot would you use?


Two issues. Material is strong enough but I have seen long pieces of (single strand) webbing extended over a lip stretch more than you would realize and make a sawing action so make sure you deal with that. It was more of an issue for me with constant rappelling than top rope climbing but a sharp edge will slice webbing in half faster than a rope. The other issue is knots. You need to be very careful about the knots that you use. Webbing does not tie like rope at all. I would only use a water knot, overhand on a bight or eight on a bight which means you would have to use your setup with a girth hitch (which you need to be careful with too). If you go to a canyoneering site they will have several different rigging styles you can learn from.
rging
From Salt Lake City, Ut
Joined Jul 18, 2011
181 points
Apr 15, 2013
CoR
SLippy wrote:
some other trust you life to what random people on the internet say sites seem to think that bowline on a bight and overhand on a bight are fine with webbing- which would make the setup more practical to setup and disassemble. thoughts? canyoneeringusa.com/techtips/w... post=2573368


Information you get from canyoneeringusa is rock solid. Tom Jones has decades of experience as a climber, canyoneer, and canyoneering guide. He has worked at Black Diamond as an engineer and is an MIT grad. I have been out with him, used products he designed and would trust him with my life.
rging
From Salt Lake City, Ut
Joined Jul 18, 2011
181 points
Administrator
Apr 15, 2013
The Hammer
When in CT, I prefer 1/2" logging chain since it can handle abrasion. I usually take a 50 foot piece along for TRing. Of course the gumby in the party gets to carry it. M Sprague
From New England
Joined Nov 9, 2006
5,455 points
Apr 15, 2013
the man was smart
rging wrote:
a sharp edge will slice webbing in half faster than a rope


really, have you tested that theory out? I beg to differ sir.
T Roper
From VA,NM,UT,CT,MA
Joined Mar 31, 2006
1,054 points
Apr 15, 2013
I wouldn't a thought of it, but cool.

Nothing says gumby-tard faster than bringing 50+' of webbing to a crag; when a hundred foot smaller static would seem more workable to me.

I guess if you were gonna TR some ice, you could use the webbing on the approach like one of those old-school avy cords and just trail it off your haul loop
Buff Johnson
Joined Dec 19, 2005
1,494 points


Follow replies to this topic? Notify me at the top of web site.
1

Email me.
Page 1 of 2.  1  2   Next>   Last>>
Beyond the Guidebook:
The Definitive Climbing Resource
Inspiration & Motivation
to Fuel Your Run
Next Generation Mountain
Bike Trail Maps
Backcountry, Sidecountry
& Secret Stashes
Better Data. Better Tools.
Better Hikes!