Tuna and Chips Wall 

On the far left hand side of the Tuna and Chips Wall on the upper tier there is a set of bolts and chains. One can easily descend from the Panty Wall down to the Tuna and Chips Wall via a single rappel from these chains.

Jason

It would appear that most of the bolts here were placed on lead, so run outs are the norm. There are some routes that will really get your attention.

More bolts are apparently needed by Markk. Those of us who are happy with the bolt counts as put up by the first ascentionists and who accept the challenges presented by these routes do not need more bolts. Perhaps what these climbs need is respect, not retrobolts. This is not a sport wall. This should not be a sport wall. This will not be a sport wall. We have those already. Enjoy the unique challenges that each route offers you, and you will grow and learn. There are a lot of different versions of "safety" and for most people climbing big rocks is not it. If you need a bolt every six feet to enjoy a climb, do everyone a favor and climb in places that have what you need. Retrobolting in Red Rock is not a long-term strategy. Respect the first ascentionists and the era these routes were put up in. Bolting the hell out of every easy climb possible simply leaves leaders high and dry later on when they get runout on classics out in the canyons where the nearest help is far, far away. Tuna and Chips is a good wall for solid leaders to experience a flavor altogether different from the Panty Wall, and that's a good thing.

"More bolts are needed" sounds like retrobolting advocacy to me. Maybe I'm sensitive about it after the Adventure Punks mess I've been cleaning up. I hear what you're saying, and agree with you that safety, sanity, some of those routes, and my own relevancy and/or literacy/sobriety/stick-like family tree may come into question. No problem with people being real about when things are runout, most of those routes are.

Map to the Tuna and Chips wall for anyone who needs it.

maps.google.com/maps/ms?msid=200440735954996048670.00049f09e>>>

i lead this route over the weekend and the 1st bolt 40+ feet off the deck certainly presents a potential danger. if any of the holds broke off (thin sandstone does do that from time to time) before the first clip, the fall would take you past the large block that juts out at the base and another small boulder at the landing. it would not be a clean fall!

i did find a shallow, horizontal pocket where you could place a medium TCU to protect before you get to the first bolt. however, after that, if you peel before you clip the second bolt you will deck anyway. certainly a gut check route, however there are sparse but possible placements if you get creative with tiny gear.

very deserving of the "R" rating.