|Tuna and Chips Wall
The Tuna and Chips Wall offers the longest routes at the First Pullout. The routes range from 5.3 to 5.10 and can be 200 feet long. The wall is south facing so it is a good location to climb on those cool days when you are looking for a warm place to climb.
[Reprinted with permission from Jed Botsford, Climbing Ranger - RRCNCA].
The approach for the Tuna and Chips Wall is the same as for the Dog Wall, but instead of turning out of the side canyon continue up canyon to the base of the Tuna and Chips Wall.
9 Total Routes
['4 Stars',0],['3 Stars',2],['2 Stars',6],['1 Star',1],['Bomb',0]
Browse More Classics in Tuna and Chips Wall
Mountain Project's determination of some of the classic, most popular, highest rated routes for Tuna and Chips Wall:
Dolphin Safe 5.7 5a 15 V+ 13 MVS 4b
R Trad, Sport, 1 pitch, 110'
Waterstreak 5.8 5b 16 VI- 15 HVS 4c
R Trad, TR, 1 pitch, 230'
Albacore Man 5.8 5b 16 VI- 15 HVS 4c
R Trad, Sport, 1 pitch, 100'
Featured Route For Tuna and Chips Wall
Sierra Club Tower 5.6 4c 14 V 12 S 4b NV
: Red Rock
: ... : Tuna and Chips Wall
The Sierra Club Tower is the short tower found on the left-hand side of the Tuna and Chips wall. This route has been led, but is better as a top-rope problem. The gear is a bit thin.There is a two-bolt anchor on top of the tower. These bolts are very close to the edge and require an individual to girth-hitch runners into the bolts in order to safely build an anchor. Carabiners clipped to these bolts would hang precariously over the edge. The top of the tower is easily accessed via the ramp t...[more] Browse More Classics in NV
Latest Regional Forum Messages
BETA PHOTO: First Pullout Overview
BETA PHOTO: View from the parking Lot
My man Brent about to do the 100' rappel into the ...
Approaching Tuna and Chips Wall, through native sc...
Kent Korbell follows on Tuna And Chips Wall. Can't...
BETA PHOTO: 'Tuna and Chips' wall is the set of twin towers in...
BETA PHOTO: Run Out 1st Bolt
|By Jason D. Martin|
Apr 7, 2006
On the far left hand side of the Tuna and Chips Wall on the upper tier there is a set of bolts and chains. One can easily descend from the Panty Wall down to the Tuna and Chips Wall via a single rappel from these chains.
|By Brian Hench|
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Mar 16, 2009
It would appear that most of the bolts here were placed on lead, so run outs are the norm. There are some routes that will really get your attention.
May 31, 2011
More bolts are apparently needed by Markk. Those of us who are happy with the bolt counts as put up by the first ascentionists and who accept the challenges presented by these routes do not need more bolts. Perhaps what these climbs need is respect, not retrobolts. This is not a sport wall. This should not be a sport wall. This will not be a sport wall. We have those already. Enjoy the unique challenges that each route offers you, and you will grow and learn. There are a lot of different versions of "safety" and for most people climbing big rocks is not it. If you need a bolt every six feet to enjoy a climb, do everyone a favor and climb in places that have what you need. Retrobolting in Red Rock is not a long-term strategy. Respect the first ascentionists and the era these routes were put up in. Bolting the hell out of every easy climb possible simply leaves leaders high and dry later on when they get runout on classics out in the canyons where the nearest help is far, far away. Tuna and Chips is a good wall for solid leaders to experience a flavor altogether different from the Panty Wall, and that's a good thing.
Jun 29, 2011
"More bolts are needed" sounds like retrobolting advocacy to me. Maybe I'm sensitive about it after the Adventure Punks mess I've been cleaning up. I hear what you're saying, and agree with you that safety, sanity, some of those routes, and my own relevancy and/or literacy/sobriety/stick-like family tree may come into question. No problem with people being real about when things are runout, most of those routes are.
|By Chris DeSantis|
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Feb 19, 2013
i lead this route over the weekend and the 1st bolt 40+ feet off the deck certainly presents a potential danger. if any of the holds broke off (thin sandstone does do that from time to time) before the first clip, the fall would take you past the large block that juts out at the base and another small boulder at the landing. it would not be a clean fall!
i did find a shallow, horizontal pocket where you could place a medium TCU to protect before you get to the first bolt. however, after that, if you peel before you clip the second bolt you will deck anyway. certainly a gut check route, however there are sparse but possible placements if you get creative with tiny gear.
very deserving of the "R" rating.
|By micah richard|
Apr 10, 2014
This wall has exactly the right combination of poor rock quality (holds that break), and poorly protected ground fall potential, that could easily put you in the hospital. Roll the dice! it's vegas baby!