Home - Destinations - iPhone/Android - Partners - Forum - Photos - Deals - What's New
Login with Facebook
 ADVANCED
Goosehead
Routes Sorted
L to R R to L Alpha
Chung King Corner 
Credibility Gap 
Death Warmed Over 
Glide Path 
Golden Egg, The 
Goosed But Smilin' 
Morgue, The 
Palms Down 
Scrambled Egg 
Zombie Flanders 

The Morgue 

YDS: 5.14a French: 8b+ Ewbanks: 32 UIAA: X+ British: E8 7a

   
Type: Sport, 1 pitch, 35'
Consensus:  YDS: 5.14a French: 8b+ Ewbanks: 32 UIAA: X+ British: E8 7a [details]
FA: Eric Scully
Season: Morning and Late Evening Shade. Best in fall, winter or spring.
Page Views: 604
Submitted By: Alex McIntyre on Sep 15, 2013
Good Page?0 people like this page. Your opinion:   

You & This Route  |  Other Opinions (2)
Your todo list:
Your stars:
Your rating: -none- [change]
Your ticklist: [add new tick]

Add Photo Add Comment    Printer View

Description 

King line of the Goosehead and the 2nd established 5.14- on Mount Lemmon. Currently unrepeated, the story of the first ascent is quite epic and is recounted by Andrew Bisharat in his article "Restoring Eric Scully".

Immediately difficult moves lead into a viciously powerful boulder problem around bolt 4 involving slopers, a 2 finger crimp and an enormous throw to a jug. Clip bolt 5 and fight through more thin and powerful moves to the chains. A discerning eye will notice that, outside of two holds reinforced with glue, this route is all natural (a rarity for hard climbs in the Tucson area).


Location 

To the right of Death Warmed Over on the west face of the Goosehead. This is the line listed as "8. Project" in Squeezing the Lemmon II.


Protection 

5 or 6 bolts to a 2 bolt anchor with chains. The first two bolts are meant to be clipped off the ground with the first serving to keep the rope out of the way.



Comments on The Morgue Add Comment
Show which comments
By Alex Kirkpatrick
Sep 19, 2013
rating: 5.13d 8b 31 X E8 7a

Sometimes I find chipped holds more aesthetically pleasing and better to climb on than glued holds, especially when the glue is smeared all over the wall or even dried on the ground around the cliff. Is one way of altering the rock superior to the other? Gluing may seem less invasive, it is certainly easier and less noisy than chipping. It is easier to convince ourselves that gluing is on the path of right; we are repairing, reinforcing, instead of destroying. But is repairing something that is meant to break better than breaking something meant to be permanent? Can we liberate ourselves from these foolish debates and qualifications in respect to old manufactured routes we admire and lovingly test ourselves on? And can we as developers respect the near infinite amount of hard climbing in the world and let well enough alone when faced with rock in "need" of modification knowing that ultimately what we want to change or fix is not the rock but ourselves.

By Marcy
From: Tempe/Tuscon, AZ
Sep 19, 2013

For me, both are equally unacceptable. Climb the rock that is there, not the rock as you may wish it to be.

Edited to add:
Alex, I like your last thought very much "ultimately what we want to change or fix is not the rock but ourselves".

By Geir
From: Tucson, AZ
Sep 20, 2013

Some good thoughts there Alex. An additional question we should ask ourselves is this: if our local land managers became aware of these practices, would they consider them legal? How might that change their view of climbers?

By Antoine Horness
From: Tucson, AZ
Sep 22, 2013

I agree with Marcy. The climbs should be cleaned for safety, but not altered to be made climbable or easier.

By Geir
From: Tucson, AZ
Sep 28, 2013

^^^^^^^That's a good way to say it.