Route Guide - iPhone / Android - Partners - Forum - Photos - Deals - What's New - School of Rock
Login with Facebook
 ADVANCED
Teale Tower
Select Route:
Teale Tower Route T 

Teale Tower Route 

YDS: 5.11a French: 6c Ewbanks: 22 UIAA: VII+ ZA: 22 British: E3 5c

   
Type:  Trad, 2 pitches, 120'
Consensus:  YDS: 5.11a French: 6c Ewbanks: 22 UIAA: VII+ ZA: 22 British: E3 5c [details]
FA: FA: Brian Teale, 1974. FFA: Gallagher and Williams, 1979
Page Views: 1,548
Submitted By: david goldstein on Aug 25, 2002

You & This Route  |  Other Opinions (8)
Your todo list:
Your stars:
Your rating: -none- [change]
Your ticklist: [add new tick]
Your opinion of this PAGE:    [0 people like this page.]
Nearing the end of the 2nd pitch

Description 

This route is probably an Elevenmile three star, but I'm taking a broader view. This "Yosemite like" (not really) climb would be a one star in Yosemite.

The obvious corner in middle of the south face of Teale Tower, a few feet to the right of a rounded fist/offwidth crack.

Starts with thin stemming and laybacking (crux) that widens to hands. Pass an offwidth section (#4 Camalot) with classy stemming and laybacking. Belay at a big ledge. Pitch 2 continues up the corner (5.9 crux about 15' up) to the intimidating roof; easier than it looks.

Anti-beta caveats: D'Antonio's guide shows two bolts at the the first belay. There are no bolts here, just a sling wedged in a constriction. Stuart Green's Colorado guide recommends a rack of double 1-4 Friends; this is just plain wrong.


Protection 

Small to medium nuts. Cams from blue Alien to #4 Camalot. Doubles from 0.5 Friend to 1.5 Friend probably handy.



Photos of Teale Tower Route Slideshow Add Photo
Mike follows up into the thin crux layback of the first pitch of Teale Tower.
Mike follows up into the thin crux layback of the ...
Comments on Teale Tower Route Add Comment
Show which comments
By Larry Shaw
Jun 2, 2004

The belay for the second pitch was junk so I bolted an anchor on the 2nd of July 04. I didn't throw chains or webbing on so if anyone is so inclined, feel free.

By Larry Shaw
Jul 28, 2005

Bob, I have no problem with removing the bolts. They were added without contacting the first ascensionist. Do you know who the FA is for the route? There were 3 routes on this rock that were used to teach clean aid climbing techniques in a mountaineering course. This was the convergence point and allowed easy and safe belaying and bailing in bad weather. The location of the anchor makes for a much better belay and allows safe retreat. This is a weak point for changing a route, but I would like to at least try to contact the FA before removing the bolts. Any info on this would be appreciated..Larry.

By Trevor
From: Cottonwood Heights, UT
Mar 28, 2007

Excellent Route....could use a few more ascents to make this superb quality.

By Nate26
Oct 7, 2007

Probably a two of three or a three of five star route in Yos. An anchor on the ledge would be pretty nice as the next pitch looks like a piece . IMHO putting an anchor on a ledge you can walk around on and retroing a crack are two different things, but whatever.

By MikeS
From: Boulder, CO
Nov 4, 2007

The second pitch is pretty entertaining, you should try it before assigning "piece" status. As said above, it looks harder than it is and is fun to figure out. The walk-off is easy in climbing shoes. I would like to repeat the request not to add any bolts to this climb (it would indeed be retrobolting, as in adding new bolts after the first ascent). If folks think that the first pitch needs cleaning up to get better, then set up a TR and run some laps. It's a great crack.

By Phil Lauffen
From: The Bubble
Jun 28, 2010

They belay for the second pitch was junk? huh? That makes no sense. I had 2 bomber nuts and 2 bomber tricams and had room for more in two seperate crack systems. No reason for bolts. This is the South Platte.

And the second pitch is actually quite fun, the roof looks way improbable from below. Great route.

By Phil Lauffen
From: The Bubble
Jun 28, 2010

And you don't need anything bigger than a #3 if you fiddle around and are willing to run it out a bit through the wider bits.