Login with Facebook
 ADVANCED
Mt. Emerson
Select Route:
Southeast Face (aka the Waterfall Route) T 

Southeast Face (aka the Waterfall Route) 

YDS: 5.4 French: 4a Ewbanks: 12 UIAA: IV ZA: 10 British: VD 3c

   
Type:  Trad, Alpine
Consensus:  YDS: 5.4 French: 4a Ewbanks: 12 UIAA: IV ZA: 10 British: VD 3c [details]
FA: G Ledyard Stebbins, Robert Stebbins (1955)
Page Views: 7,606
Submitted By: fossana on Jun 7, 2010

You & This Route  |  Other Opinions (34)
Your todo list:
Your stars:
Your rating: -none- [change]
Your ticklist: [add new tick]
Your opinion of this PAGE:    [2 people like this page.]
Lisa on one of the many gendarmes on the Emerson r...

Description 

Short approach for a fun alpine route on solid rock. Short 5.4 crux.

Note that the chimney may be wet in early season.

Route
Climb the 5.4 crack. If the chimney is too wet you can climb the face to the right of a second chimney. The chimney is blocked with chockstones at which point you can easily cross and move left onto an easy ramp system that connects with the original route.

Continue up class 3-4 slabs eventually leading back into the original crack for a pitch of class 4. Head up a broad chute for 500 ft, then cross left across a rib into another chute. Aim for a notch in the ridge then proceed along the amazing ridgeline to the summit, passing several gendarmes to keep the grade at class 4.

Location 

Approach:
From the trailhead in the N Lake campground take the junction toward Piute Pass. Just before Loch Leven the trail will weave across a typical Sierra headwall. At the right-most part of the hairpin cross-country up the talus field to the base of the route. Emerson is distinct from the reddish, fractured (chossy) Piute Crags to its right. Aim for the left-most of two prominent cracks that split the lower face (see beta photo).

Descent:
S slope (class 3) to Loch Leven, then back down the trail to the N Lake campground.

Protection 

alpine rack, 50-60m rope (optional)
no fixed anything


Photos of Southeast Face (aka the Waterfall Route) Slideshow Add Photo
looking back toward N Lake
looking back toward N Lake
Turn off the trail at these steps and start workin...
BETA PHOTO: Turn off the trail at these steps and start workin...
Self portrait at the summit. Perfect day.
Self portrait at the summit. Perfect day.
route and the Piute Crags
BETA PHOTO: route and the Piute Crags
lower crack
lower crack
topo showing Emerson and the N Lake trailhead
BETA PHOTO: topo showing Emerson and the N Lake trailhead
5.4 crux
BETA PHOTO: 5.4 crux
Jascha on the crux
Jascha on the crux
Emerson from Loch Leven
Emerson from Loch Leven
looking back down the ridgeline
looking back down the ridgeline
another overview of the route
BETA PHOTO: another overview of the route
Looking up the rest of the ridge to the summit.  S...
BETA PHOTO: Looking up the rest of the ridge to the summit. S...
early season glissade descent
early season glissade descent
On the final ridge. Sweet views of the Evolutions ...
On the final ridge. Sweet views of the Evolutions ...
less than optimal chimney conditions
less than optimal chimney conditions
Loch Leven
Loch Leven
Looking up at Pitch 1 of SE Face.  Rated 5.4 but s...
BETA PHOTO: Looking up at Pitch 1 of SE Face. Rated 5.4 but s...
A lunch with a view.  June 2012
A lunch with a view. June 2012
Looking down at Pitch 2 in the chimney section.
Looking down at Pitch 2 in the chimney section.
The decent without snow. The middle is loose the w...
BETA PHOTO: The decent without snow. The middle is loose the w...
an ice axe may be helpful in early season in the g...
BETA PHOTO: an ice axe may be helpful in early season in the g...
Instead of going out on the face, we decided to fo...
BETA PHOTO: Instead of going out on the face, we decided to fo...
final ridge traverse
final ridge traverse
Looking up at the notch where we gained the ridge....
BETA PHOTO: Looking up at the notch where we gained the ridge....

Show All 30 Photos

Only the first 24 are shown above.

Comments on Southeast Face (aka the Waterfall Route) Add Comment
Show which comments
Comments displayed oldest to newestSkip Ahead to the Most Recent Dated Aug 21, 2014
By Weston L
From: Summerlin, NV
Mar 7, 2012
rating: Easy 5th 1+ 3 I 5 M 1c

A very fun and quick outing! Absolutely stellar, go do it.
By Aerili
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Jun 11, 2012

I think all in all, you do about 1000' of chute hiking combined. It doesn't seem to matter where you cross over, either--just pick an easy spot.

The start and finish more than make up for the less-than-stellar middle section, although I mixed in 4th and 5th class moves in the chutes to make things more interesting.

On the descent, stay as far to skier's left as possible since the ground is most stable there. From above, it often appears you will cliff out many times, but it always goes.
By spyork
From: Fremont, CA
Jul 6, 2012

Climbed on 6/30/12 - The entire chimney was dry. Crossing over the rock rib was a bit confusing. I ended up climbing more 5th class than I had to. The finish on the ridge took more time than it should, I kept trying to go around left or right, but then ended up going over the top. The beta about staying left on the descent was great, thanks Aerili!
By Rude Boy
From: San Francisco, CA
Jul 3, 2013
rating: Easy 5th 1+ 3 I 5 M 1c

Yeah stay left on the descent. I went straight down the gully and it sucked ass for 2500 feet of class 3 down climbing.
By Superclimber
Sep 15, 2013

To find the South Chute descent: continue heading west along the summit ridge after passing the true summit. Watch for the chute on your left (south). It's a little ways past the summit. Once in the chute follow Aerili's advice.

Also, when following the summit ridge after the summit looking for the descent, if you stay too high on the ridge you may get faced with a 20 ft 5th class down climb. Might be better to go down a little bit on the South side as you follow the ridge toward the South Chute.
By Anouk Erni
Oct 11, 2013

There was some confusion as to the start of the climb because the two large cracks aren't necessarily visible/obvious from the switchback angle. We hiked up a little further from the switchbacks where the trail was nice and flat, and then we could see the cracks. I've added a beta photo with a big arrow pointing out the start of the climb from the angle we could see from the trail. Going up the talus field was easy compared to some others I've traveled. The climb itself is very doable solo/no rope and is mostly fun scrambling. You can make it easier or more difficult as you ascend. Mostly sturdy rock but there were some loose sections in the shoots. I found some amazing short 5.7 hand cracks (that were exposed but solid) that I couldn't pass up. Did the whole thing in approach shoes - if you have shoes with sticky rubber, leave your climbing shoes at home. The ridgeline was great! Took us 8 hours car to car at an easy pace. Fun day!
By kenr
Jul 24, 2014

Had a lot of fun on it today.
The summit ridge is great, and continued for longer than I expected. The starting moves are interesting, and there's lots of other good gully climbing. And it's worthwhile as routefinding "adventure" out in the middle of this big face -- not sure when's the best time to switch to a different gully, where to get on the ridge, etc.

But it has more drawbacks than some other great Sierra ridge routes: The descent of the south face on sand and scree is not fun at all, and goes on much too long for something that un-fun (like about 2000 vertical feet / 600 meters) -- so maybe I should have tried descending the rock rib instead. The discontinuity in the climbing, with some hiking sections in the middle between the lower chimney and the great summit ridge. The extra 0.5 mile (800m) of flat walking on the road at the beginning and end. Surrounding lakes + mountains not quite as pretty - (but pretty enough).

I think you get more sustained fun for less work on like say Mt Conness, or the Aretes of Crystal Crag Direct near Mammoth Lakes. But Mt Emerson still worthwhile as another fun high Sierra adventure.

Ken
By kenr
Jul 24, 2014

Some statistics ...
  • approach to start of 5th class climbing from official day-visitor Parking:
. . about 2000 vertical feet over 2.5 miles horizontal
. . / ( +600 meters over 4 km distance )

  • start of 5th class climbing to summit
. . about 2000 vertical feet over 0.5 mile horizontal
. . / ( +600 meters over 0.8km distance)

  • summit ridge climbing (including upper descent section NW from summit)
. . about 1100 ft horizontal (330 meters)

  • Total from official Parking to summit
. . about 4000 vertical feet over 3 miles distance
. . / ( +1200 meters over 5km distance )

  • descent on steep sand + scree
. . about 2000 vertical feet over 0.6 mile horizontal
. . / ( 600 vertical meters over 1 km distance )
__________________________________________________________
some GPS latitude longitude (approximate)
  • official day-visitor parking: (N37.2275 W118.6273)
  • trailhead: (N37.2272 W118.6275)
  • leave trail to go NNW up to chimney: (N37.2337 W118.6483)
  • bottom of 5th class chimney: (N37.2360 W118.6498)
  • notch where I joined summit ridge: (N37.2404 W118.6532)
. . (would be interesting to know if could have joined it lower)
  • first gendarme after I joined ridge: (N37.2405 W118.6535)
  • summit: (N37.2425 W118.6542)
__________________________________________________________
By old5ten
From: Berkeley + Sunny Slopes, CA
Aug 21, 2014
rating: 5.4 4a 12 IV 10 VD 3c

Fun climb! 12.5 hours CTC for the geriatric corps. 1:45 approach to base; 6.5 for the climb (including lowering some hapless soloist from top of P1 - why solo when you're not up for it?), mostly belaying and simulclimbing, very little soloing; 0:15 for the salami sandwich on top; 3.5 for the full descent.