|Type:||Trad, 5 pitches, Grade II|
|Consensus:||YDS: 5.9 French: 5c Ewbanks: 17 UIAA: VI ZA: 17 British: HVS 5a [details]|
|FA:||R. Willmott and P. Botta, 1962|
|Submitted By:||John Bradford on Nov 19, 2007|
|Comments on Snake||Add Comment|
|Show which comments —
By Evan Stevens
Jun 26, 2008
|Snake is an old, old classic, not from Jeff, et al 2001! Jeff has contributed a ton to Squamish climbing, but this one was established by R. Willmott and P. Botta in 62 (as per the guidebook.)|
By Peter Spindloe
From: North Vancouver, BC
Jun 30, 2008
|Thanks Evan, I updated it.|
By Matt Desenberg
From: North Berwick, ME
May 10, 2009
|Skip Diedre and do this instead. I don't remember the .9 sections being too difficult, and it's a way better route with half the crowds.|
By Mike Teschke
From: North Vancouver
Jun 8, 2009
I climbed this on Saturday, we were the only party on the route all morning, there was a second group about half way up the route by the time we got back to the parking lot. Only a stones throw away on Diedre, there was multiple groups at each of the first couple belay stations... :(
Snake is a great route, and totally a better alternative to Diedre if you are up for a grade harder climb.
By Andy Laakmann
From: Bend, OR
Aug 7, 2009
rating: 5.9 5c 17 VI 17 HVS 5a
Great route - but expect lots of low-angle liebacking (big surprise for the Apron!)
P1 - Long pitch, 55m, up the corner and then out the dike to the bolted anchor. You can't really protect the dike traverse (you'd hit the slab below with all the rope stretch), but it isn't terribly hard if you find the right feet.
P2 - Traverse left. I did the lower slab option, and found it engaging considering your protection is 30' to your right. After finishing the traverse, you can protect your second by climbing up and then right and placing a #2 camalot.
P3 - Crux pitch IMO. The final moves to the anchor are thin and high in the grade. A small nut and blue mastercam protected this move fine though.
P4 - Guess what, more liebacking! You even get a bolt on the way. The traverse right to the anchor didn't seem cruxy to me. Plenty of gear options on the traverse.
P5 - Guess what, more liebacking... only easier :)
I brought a double rack of small cams (green C3) to #3 camalot and nuts (including small) and it worked perfectly. I found the climbing to be engaging for the grade.
From: Seattle, WA
Jul 14, 2014
rating: 5.9 5c 17 VI 17 HVS 5a PG13
Safety beta: I almost decked off of the unprotectable dike traverse (5.7), which is the most dangerous part of the route. My mistake was going too high on the traverse and making it into 5.10 climbing, if it feels hard you are probably too high - stay low and find a great right sidepull as you traverse left. It should feel like 5.7. The last pro I had is a #2 camalot in the short vertical crack (which held my fall), but if you have a #3 you can place it marginally higher, maybe only a foot or two, behind the flake to the right of the short vertical crack. I don't think I missed any pro opportunities above that. You'll figure it out, just make sure you have a 2 or 3 left before the dike traverse on this long pitch.
With respect to other climbs being perhaps excessively popular (Diedre), the description of this climb in the squamish select book is accurate: a step up in difficulty from Diedre, [featuring] thin, technical laybacking. (read: slab feet with thin fingers layback or face edges), so take this into account if you are pushing your limits. Also, I found the protection more sparse.