A lot of climbers seem to scoff at this type of quantitative analysis and prefer to go on the subjective "feel" of gear, but I really enjoyed this writeup.
That article was nuts. Hard to believe that crunching all that data and making all those cute charts would be helpful to someone who is trying to learn crack/gear sizes, but I guess we're all wired different.
This excellent article was posted by PellucidWombat over at SummitPost. www.summitpost.org/size-matters-a-gear-comparison/694359 A lot of climbers seem to scoff at this type of quantitative analysis and prefer to go on the subjective "feel" of gear, but I really enjoyed this writeup.
edit: works fine now, weird. That dude had a LOT of time on his hands!
All that stuff is great. In the end though, it just confirms what I've kinda know all along...
Metolius needs to make a 1.5 and 3. TCU/Mastercam! Least amount of overlap of any cams in that range. A PITA if you ask me. CCH had their overlaps more dialed in...