Peking 5.8
| 1,271 page views Good page?  |
| Type: | Trad, 2 pitches, 300 feet |
| Consensus: | 5.8- [details] |
| FA: | Tom Bauman & Osa Thatcher May 5, 1969 |
| Submitted By: | corvegas on Feb 5, 2007 |
| |
Leading the classic first pitch of Peking, c. 1994...
Add Photo Printer View
Description First pitch is classic, many stop at first set of anchors. The upper pitch is great fun though a little loose. P1 - 5.8 - Hand traverse left to a splitter hand crack. Follow crack up to bolted belay, belay from bolts if planning on just doing first pitch. Or continue up another 60 ft to a good belay ledge blow the P2 crux. Belay from mid sized cams. P2 - 5.8 - Crank the awkward 5.8 bulge then head striaght up untill your rope runs out. Belay mid sized cams. 4th class scamble to top.
Location Just to the left of Moscow.
Protection Gear to 3"
Shirley leading Peking in suboptimal conditions.
| | |
By BenCooper From: Olympia, WA Apr 17, 2007
| Climb the first pitch, then rap. The rest of the route is chossy and not fun at all. We were pulling delicately around dinner plate sized rocks for much of it, so we nicknamed it "mutually assured destruction." First pitch is great though. |
By rpc May 10, 2007
| was it really that bad? I admit to doing it a couple years back but don't reacall anything looser than say Moscow next door on it?? An OK upper pitch but nothing like the opening crack of course. |
By Alpine Carl May 31, 2007
| Yep, it was that bad: bad enough, anyway, to send me traversing right in hopes of bailing onto Moscow. There is a cool eagle's nest in the cave to the west, though. P.S. Ben Kenobi didn't learn his lesson, though, and neither did I; we've both been spending a lot of time in the desert lately... And ironically, we've both been spending a lot time birding. |
By ferrells From: Minneapolis, MN Dec 20, 2009
| It seemed pretty chossy to me as well. From the ground, I saw a bunch of weeds and fractured rocks, but I thought: "It can't be that bad. Maybe it's only a short section." I wanted to do Peking, after doing Moscow a couple weeks ago, so I climbed Chouinard's Crack (awesome), and joined Moscow for a while to avoid the crap above Chouinard's Crack. At every opportunity, I stepped left (through choss) and looked around, but never saw anything that looked worth climbing. And, yes, Moscow is quite a bit cleaner. Except for a few feet, Moscow is immaculate splitter cracks. |
By K Baumgartner Aug 4, 2012 rating: 5.7
| Climb the first half pitch and then link up with Moscow. The rest of Peking just isn't worth it. I didn't think the bulges after Chouniard's were any harder than 5.6+. Some fractured rock and a ton of bird doodoo. |
|