New Yosemite Free Climbs Select Guidebook Almost Done - Call for Photos!
|
Yo Gang, I'm very close to releasing my new Yosemite Free Climbs Select book. My goal with this book was to include three to four times the content of the current Supertopo Free Climbs book. Several whole new cliffs have been added to what that book presented. Of course all of the free bigwall topos are in there too(Tommy Caldwell worked with me to revamp all of the El Cap topos). If you have inspiring photos of classic Yosemite Free Climbs, especially routes 5.10 or easier(several professional photags have signed on, so we'll have plenty of pics of the pros cranking the hard stuff), now is your chance to get published. Guidebooks are mostly a labor of love, so for just one or two pictures all I can offer is a your name in the acknowledgments and a few free books. This project has been so exciting to work on. The community support here in Yosemite has been overwhelmingly awesome. Here are some tidbits to get you stoked - Leah on possibly the best short multipitch 5.9 route, Absolutely Free, and a new topo for Sentinel Creek. Email me with any questions or with photos! Thank You! Erik Yosemitebigwall.com |
|
Erik is currently the center of a veritable shit storm in the Valley (and SuperTopo) over his out of control retro-bolting. You should check into it yourself and contemplate whether this is the sort of thing you condone and want to support by buying any product from anyone so inclined. |
|
To anyone thinking of buying this book when it comes out, I would highly recommend reading those threads. Sure some of it is a witch hunt and there's almost certainly more gray area than the threads would have you believe, but Erik has admitted to retroing climbs and adding hole count to established lines. Supertopo may not fully represent the YV climbing community, but there are enough people asking Erik to stop that I think this needs to be taken seriously. He has probably done some real good in the Valley with bolt replacement, but IMO has carried this a huge step too far and refuses to even consider that a large proportion of climbers don't approve. |
|
Erik, |
|
Hi Guys, |
|
Healyje wrote:Erik is currently the center of a veritable shit storm in the Valley (and SuperTopo) over his out of control retro-bolting. You should check into it yourself and contemplate whether this is the sort of thing you condone and want to support by buying any product from anyone so inclined. New anchors added to Book of Revelations? Erik Sloan’s Latest Victim – Ten Days After |
|
I wont be buying the book. I dont support retro-bolting routes and wont be giving my money to anyone that does. |
|
I'll buy both books whenever they come out. Life too short to get caught up in the storm. |
|
Kevin Mokracek wrote:I'll buy both books whenever they come out. Life too short to get caught up in the storm.Your life is short. So is mine. Our resources and climbing are supposed to outlive us. Retrobolting sucks. Bolt wars such worse, and that is what happens when someone is sanctified. Allow me to quote the author: Erik Sloan Nov 5, 2015 - 12:14pm PT "I added that belay. It's for practice aid climbing. If you remove the bolts, I will add them back." No thanks for this particular book. No thanks to the author. No thanks to the attitude. |
|
Tony B wrote: Your life is short. So is mine. Our resources and climbing are supposed to outlive us.Not to condone the OP, but we don't know what the future generations will see in the valley. IMO, most of the damage have already been done via the pin scars (& chipping) from the aid eras. It's telling the most vocal opposers are a bunch of old farts. To assume they are raising these oppositions to preserve the rock for the future generations would be a bit specious. |
|
reboot wrote: Not to condone the OP, but we don't know what the future generations will see in the valley. IMO, most of the damage have already been done via the pin scars (& chipping) from the aid eras. It's telling the most vocal opposers are a bunch of old farts. To assume they are raising these oppositions to preserve the rock for the future generations would be a bit specious.We used to do all kinds of things that we are educated not to do any more. I'm OK with learning from mistakes and going on a more sustainable path. Are you poo-pooing the older protesters, or are you saying that you are OK with adding mid-pitch anchors on classics or retro-bolting routes? Are you condoning his proclamation of 'leave it how I changed it or I'll proceed with my bolt-war'? As a person quite directly concerned with access, I find that attitude deplorable. |
|
reboot wrote: Not to condone the OP, but we don't know what the future generations will see in the valley. IMO, most of the damage have already been done via the pin scars (& chipping) from the aid eras. It's telling the most vocal opposers are a bunch of old farts. To assume they are raising these oppositions to preserve the rock for the future generations would be a bit specious.Your entire argument is specious. What future generations will see in the valley if folks like ES have their way is mid-pitch anchors and climbs which have been retrobolted down to a new lowest common denominator. ES is betting against the future generations, not on them. |
|
Tony B wrote: Are you poo-pooing the older protesters, or are you saying that you are OK with adding mid-pitch anchors on classics or retro-bolting routes? Are you condoning his proclamation of 'leave it how I changed it or I'll proceed with my bolt-war'?I did say "Not to condone the OP", but I'm also saying I don't believe the dialogue is all that honest either. It roughs the feather of the old generation primarily because it alters how they view the valley, not necessarily how the future generations may want the valley to be left at. |
|
reboot wrote: I did say "Not to condone the OP", but I'm also saying I don't believe the dialogue is all that honest either. It roughs the feather of the old generation primarily because it alters how they view the valley, not necessarily how the future generations may want the valley to be left at.PRESENTLY, the climbing community at large community seems largely set on not retrobolting, which is why you see it set as a rule in pretty much every FRHC I am aware of and why the ASCA won't do it. Betting that: A) the future generation will want something else and that B) an individual presently can predict that should not be used to justify and enforced unilateral action. If his vision is valid, than so is everybody else's. Unilateral actions are the essence of a bolt war, and he seems to be dying to start one. No thanks. And to note: I'm not a terribly old generation and sure as shit never swung a hammer at rock other than to enlarge an existing hole to replace a rivet that fell out at a belay on the Hallucinogen Wall. |
|
Mike. wrote: What does the age/experience of the objectors tell you?What does the lack of interest on mp.com to this topic tells you? |
|
I too will not be buying his book. |
|
reboot wrote: What does the lack of interest on mp.com to this topic tells you?That it hasn't gone viral and isn't posted as "new guidebook author retrobolts long standing yosemite climbs" so it isn't attracting the attention of crowds here. To the contrary, it's a solicitation for pictures. The subject got plenty of attention on supertopo. What does that interest tell you? |
|
Erik, |
|
Allow me to quote the author: |
|
Tony B wrote: The subject got plenty of attention on supertopo. What does that interest tell you?Not much, plenty of stuff only draw interest on ST. And frankly, I'd rather they stay there. |
|
Hope to see this thread pick up some steam. |