Mountain Project Logo

Mt. Lemmon Sandbags and Sandbags that should have an R or X.

Original Post
1Eric Rhicard · · Tucson · Joined Feb 2006 · Points: 10,126

You need to have climbed the route clean (without falls) at least twice before posting it up. It cannot be a single letter grade off. the route needs to be two or more letter grades off. Sometimes a route seems harder when onsighting because you mess up sequences so I want you to post it if you have done it enough to be sure it is a sandbag. You can also post up routes that should have an R and do not.

I will start.
40 to Life at prison camp. Rated 5.9 is more like 10-

Bobby Hanson · · Spokane, WA · Joined Oct 2001 · Points: 1,230

Sorry, Eric. I am pretty sure there aren't any sandbags on Mt. Lemmon.

Hendrixson · · Littleton, CO · Joined Sep 2007 · Points: 3,290

I agree on 40 to Life but I only climbed it once.

Admiral Throckmorton on The Druid is probably not 5.8.

Bogeet Mondoo on Obscure Rock may not be 5.11. I haven't redpointed it.

While it is fun to discuss I try not to get too caught up in grades. As long as the route is safe it only hurts one's ego. A better question might be what spicy sandbags are out there.

Geir www.ToofastTopos.com · · Tucson/DMR · Joined Jun 2006 · Points: 2,751

Damn. Now I am going to be thinking of climbing all day again. Nice work Eric!

:)
geir

1Eric Rhicard · · Tucson · Joined Feb 2006 · Points: 10,126

Good point John, title changed. I am not that concerned about numbers either. I am not looking to start a quibble fest here just want to know which ones folks think are badly bagged. If a lot of folks think Bogeet is bagged as I do we will rate it 11+ in the next guide.

Jimbo and I were on two routes at the Boneyard which Jim thought were 9. When I looked in the book they were actually rated harder and were within a letter grade so I didn't need to change them.

1Eric Rhicard · · Tucson · Joined Feb 2006 · Points: 10,126

The reason I think folks need to have climbed things more than once is that it is easy to miss holds or sequences. We need only look at all the beta that has made routes at the Orifice easier after hundreds of runs.

Christian RodaoBack · · Tucson, AZ · Joined Jul 2005 · Points: 1,486

Slippery When Wet (PG13 gear), Rabbit Tracks, Stoner's Boner and Mistaken Identity more like 9+/10-, the start of Old Man is not 5.9 and hard to protect, Admiral Throckmorton and the one next to it, the 5.9 to the left of Old Man also has non 5.9 start and hard to protect..

Hai Karate is easy to go straight up at the start and make it 5.10 instead of diagonal left and 5.7 at the start

Lady of the Knight at Chessmen more like 10+ and very crappy swing into corner fall potential

Christian RodaoBack · · Tucson, AZ · Joined Jul 2005 · Points: 1,486

Unless you learned how to place bomber gear instantly, by definition any lead when you're starting trad can be spicy.

So knowing whether you'll be sandbagged on grades could be important to your safety, not just your ego.

NickMartel · · Tucson, Arizona · Joined Aug 2011 · Points: 1,332

Warden at Jailhouse. Now its not that difficult of a route but it is MUCH harder than the other 7's at jailhouse/Alcatraz/ect... And the toughest part is right off the ground (from ground to 2ed bolt), and the route starts from that ledge that is itself 6' off the ground but that you would hit and bounce off of to the ground if you fell.

Charles Vernon · · Colorado megalopolis · Joined Jan 2001 · Points: 2,655

Reefer Madness at the Reef had an R in Steiger but not in SQL II. I've done it twice, leading all the relevant pitches, and think it still deserves an R for pitches 2 & 4. It takes some micro-nuts, which would have been around in the early 80s, but the newer fancy micro-cams really don't help.

Only done it once but I believe very strongly that you should take out the notation that Charadras is "a good first 5.7 gear lead"!

Alex McIntyre · · Tucson, AZ · Joined Jan 2011 · Points: 546
Christian wrote:Slippery When Wet (PG13 gear), Rabbit Tracks, Stoner's Boner and Mistaken Identity more like 9+/10-, the start of Old Man is not 5.9 and hard to protect, Admiral Throckmorton and the one next to it, the 5.9 to the left of Old Man also has non 5.9 start and hard to protect.. Hai Karate is easy to go straight up at the start and make it 5.10 instead of diagonal right and 5.7 at the start Lady of the Knight at Chessmen more like 10+ and very crappy swing into corner fall potential
I would disagree with Old Man. The beginning corner is not harder than other Mount Lemmon 5.9's from that era and it has several textbook stopper placements from 10 feet or so up to the top of the clean corner. I remember being really comfortable with how bomber the stoppers were.

Mistaken Identity is also definitely not 5.10. I haven't been on the others you listed so I can't comment on those.
jbak x · · tucson, az · Joined Jan 2006 · Points: 4,671

Alex... I'm glad you said it so I don't have to.

Christian RodaoBack · · Tucson, AZ · Joined Jul 2005 · Points: 1,486
Alex McIntyre wrote: I would disagree with Old Man. The beginning corner is not harder than other Mount Lemmon 5.9's from that era and it has several textbook stopper placements from 10 feet or so up to the top of the clean corner. I remember being really comfortable with how bomber the stoppers were. Mistaken Identity is also definitely not 5.10. I haven't been on the others you listed so I can't comment on those.
Old Man: Key words being "of that era" and 10 feet up,sheesh..Not exactly the best place to deck from 10 feet up and start rolling and bouncing down the hill, taking your belayer with you, don't you think?..I've personally witnessed a 5.12 climber fall off the balancey opening moves..The start can be protected right away w a very small Black Alien type cam or possibly steel micronut, but these are pieces someone building their rack might not have..

My general attitude about all of this is: "You can make your own decisions, but in general it's better to have this info and not need it, than need it and not have it."
Geir www.ToofastTopos.com · · Tucson/DMR · Joined Jun 2006 · Points: 2,751
Christian wrote:My general attitude about all of this is: "You can make your own decisions, but in general it's better to have this info and not need it, than need it and not have it."
I agree Christian!

Geir
jbak x · · tucson, az · Joined Jan 2006 · Points: 4,671

I guess I just don't get the move-by-move piece-by-piece mentality. Probably because most of my early climbing was either no-guidebook or very vague guidebook. You climb the rock, not a book. If the pro isn't there, you have a decision... suck it up, or back off and live another day. As I used to tell my partners (way back then) "climbing is a exercise in JUDGEMENT above all else."

Hendrixson · · Littleton, CO · Joined Sep 2007 · Points: 3,290
Lady of the Knight should probably be rated 10+. I've climbed it the requisite number of times.

Heelium should probably be downgraded to 12- but I have yet to redpoint it. Somehow I did it on TR but never lead.

These are minor quibbles.

Does Squeezing the Lemmon use the PG-13 rating? Most of the spicy routes I can think of could potentially earn a PG-13 but not an R.
Ian Cavanaugh · · Ketchum, ID · Joined Sep 2010 · Points: 620

I must say this is a pretty ridiculous post. Most of these routes are being up graded by half a grade. What is the big deal? maybe you should all just leave the grades as they are and climb harder. Just a thought. I mean are these routes really that sandbagged, a letter or two is not a bad sandbag, or are they true to grade and people just havent spent much time climbing in other areas around the country/world. I know personally I would rather climb in an area know for hard ratings rather than soft ones. Besides when you finally do step out side of your home town and go and climb at some world class areas, you will be more ready and will not be so disappointed that all the climbs there are so "hard" or "sandbagged". Its just a number, dont worry about the plus or minus at the end of the grade and just climb.

mcarizona · · Flag · Joined Feb 2007 · Points: 180

" 40 to Life at prison camp. Rated 5.9 is more like 10-"

Sorry I dont qualify because I don't climb there (always looking for a way to get there though). Anyway 5.9 is harder than 10- right??

Eric D · · Gnarnia · Joined Nov 2006 · Points: 235

I personally don't like the us of PG-13 ratings. R and X are great in that you can either get seriously hurt or you can die, very straightforward. PG-13 enters a grey area which is part of all climbing, the fact that you might not get protection when you want it.

Daniel Cohn · · Unknown Hometown · Joined May 2006 · Points: 445

Main Gate seemed run out because I had to pull solid 5.8 moves pretty high above sketchy gear. It is possible I was off route too as the line wasn't clear to me.

Helm's Deep probably deserves an R until the bolts are replaced. Without them it is still pg-13. EDIT: I saw they were replaced. Thanks Guys!

Old Man seems like a fair 5.9 to me. The start could arguably be pg-13 but the hard move is right off the ground and any danger should be obvious to a competent climber.

I know the original rating of Bogeet was 11+ and this seems fair to me due to the pump factor.

Dan Cucci · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Aug 2010 · Points: 5

+1 for 40 to Life and for Admiral Throckmorton - the roof move isn't 5.8.
Corporal Punishment, next to AT, has a decent run-out below the roof on easy ground, but is more like 5.8 than 5.9.

Makin Muffins on Swim Fin has a pretty high first bolt with a potentially bad fall. The aptly named Ego Donor always seemed like a tough 5.9 - could be a bad fall if you mess up going to the bolt above the ledge.

Guideline #1: Don't be a jerk.

Arizona & New Mexico
Post a Reply to "Mt. Lemmon Sandbags and Sandbags that should ha…"

Log In to Reply
Welcome

Join the Community

Create your FREE account today!
Already have an account? Login to close this notice.

Get Started