moving to UT, Cedar City or Logan? for best climbing opportunities/town scene
|
Hey Utah climbers, |
|
Monika, you will not find either location as hip as Helena, MT in my opinion, but Logan would be the closest. Yes, smaller towns in UT have a higher concentration of Mormons than Salt Lake. These are both state schools with mostly Mormons in attendance. |
|
Don't move to Cedar City if you want a town scene. Move there if you want a lifetime of adventure climbing possibilities and a lifetime of sport climbing within a 1.5 hour drive |
|
I moved to Logan in 1999 precisely for the climbing and to finish my undergrad because there are hundreds of climbing routes within 15 minutes of campus. Sport/Trad, its all there, and I still love the endless limestone lines I learned to climb on. Great canyon, fun little ski hill not too far out. |
|
The above posters have provided tons of good info. I have not lived in either town so can't speak to the town scene, but as far as outdoor stuff, it's worth noting the (obvious) fact that Cedar City is in the southern desert and Logan is in a mountain valley up in the Wasatch mountains. Thus, they have very different vibes when you are outside. If you love living in the desert, Cedar City has you covered. I love to visit there but would find living in the desert depressing; I love living in the Wasatch mountains. As far as climbing, Cedar City is next to desert climbing (sandstone especially) like Dow notes, while Logan has tons of limestone practically within city limits and is within pretty close driving times to lots of Rocky Mountain-style climbing destinations in N. Utah, Idaho, and Wyoming, with the rock types you expect in the mountains. |