|Photos:||Recent | Best | Popular|
|Administrator:||Kristine Hoffman (sitewide)|
|Submitted By:||Lacey LaDuke on Nov 3, 2008|
|re: Maple Canyon Additional Camping?||DoNstamos||39 mins ago|
|re: Boise based climber ISO climber for this weekend, Sept 19-21 - Sawtooths, McCall...maybe COR||Sean Gould||10 hours ago|
|Draws left at Battalion of Saints||sherpajames||15 hours ago|
|re: Partner Needed: September 15-18 @ City of Rock & Slick Rock||JimPace||1 day ago|
|re: Rock climbing McCall FB page||Sean Gould||1 day ago|
|re: Elephants Perch||kevinhansen||2 days ago|
|Found: Climbing Shoes at Ruth Lake 9/2||Hunter Enochs||2 days ago|
|re: Camping at the City||Randy Covington||3 days ago|
|Comments on Lower Fifth Canyon||Add Comment|
|Show which comments —
By Scott Coldiron
From: Spokane, WA
Jun 24, 2009
I would argue that for the 5.10 climber, The Lower 5th has much better climbs than any of the walls up above. The climbs are more technical and quite a bit more interesting, I think, than any 5.10 on the Post Wall or Garden Wall. They are also a bit harder, as grade creep does not seem to have reached the Lower fifth yet.
The approach is nowhere near as long or arduous as I had thought. In less than 5 minutes from the Garden Wall you can be at the Lower 5th.
The trail is also quite good, with one or two short third-class sections.
From: North Idaho
Apr 7, 2012
|I agree this is much truer to the grade than most within the park. That could cause a problem for those that think they can send 10's at Q' Emlin, then make it to the Lower Fifth. For example, a 10b at the Lower Fifth is more like a 10d on the other walls.|