Start to the left of a large overhang and just right of a large, right-facing dihedral. Watch out for poison ivy near the start.
P1: Start up the easy ramp and grovel up left through an awkward slot. Climb a thin slab with marginal small pro, traverse back right, and continue up a crack to a decent ledge (7).
P1 variation 1 (5.8): Start on Break on Through, 20' to the right. Climb the layback corner, go up a ramp, turn the overhanging corner on the left, and traverse left to the first belay on Long John Wall. Recommended.
P1 variation 2 (5.7): Start on Ignominity, 20' to the left. Climb a right-facing corner, pass a bulge, and traverse right to the first belay on Long John Wall.
P2: Ascend the great finger crack (8) to a small roof; continue up to a large ledge, traverse left 15', and belay below a wide slot.
P3: Climb the slot, then continue up the brilliant dihedral to the crux--a finger/hand crack in a corner with excellent stemming. Belay on another large ledge by a tree.
P4: Finish the short and easy (5) dihedral to the summit, or if you're in a hurry, rap off a tree 10' to the left.
P4 variation (5.8): Traverse right about 20' and climb up a corner with some old pins. Then move right and climb past a wide crack to the top.
You can do both P4 variations if you have the time, since the descent takes you back to the starting ledge for this pitch.
Descent: Downclimb a gully to the north of the finish back to the same belay ledge for P3. Do 2 rappels from rings (the tree anchors have been removed) with a 60m rope down to a broken ledge, and then follow the ledge uphill to the trail. Angle the second rappel to the left and watch the ends of the rope. Be VERY careful if you only have a 50m rope, but you can make it with some downclimbing.
The first pitch of this climb is a scary lead, especially if you are expecting a 5.5 romp up. The traverse right is unprotected, take care to place pro at the start of this section which will not rip out if you slip, or you could hit the ground.
I had heard horror stories about this section and I won say it was well-protected or a normal 5.5, but it isn't "that" bad. I think people (like my partner, following the pitch) forget to stem out between the ledge and the sloping rightward traverse-that actually seemed to make it 5.5 and pretty secure. I got in a good RP at my waist for this move, which isn't the most comforting piece, but it probably would have held. I actually found the belly crawl leftward, before the sloper moves, to be a bit more spooky.
What's the point of my rambling? If you are solid enough to lead the rest of the route, I don't think the first pitch should be a problem--it shouldn't scare you off from doing the route. Also, if you get to the traverse and do get spooked, it would be easy to escape further left and climb some broken stuff to the belay ledge. Still, definitely not a good lead if you are, say, just learning to lead and your partner is planning to lead the rest of the climb, though.
Heads up on the first pitch. I can't believe this route doesn't get an s rating. Before commiting to the sloper traverse right, put gear in the ledge you e standing on. That way, if you fall, you probably won't die.
I linked the first pitch with a route to the right of Long John, it was protectable and much fun, then traversed out left to belay, I thought the roof deserves some mention here, absolutely magnificent!
That first pitch is by no means 5.5. It has thin technical moves that would result in a ledge fall even with the gear! This pitch should definitely get an S rating, and we should consider bumping that YDS rating to 7???
Another alternative to the normal first pitch is to climb the dihedral 25 feet left of the normal start. This is the start of the first pitch of Ignominity. Go up the dihedral past the first tree, then climb up to the right of a second tree to reach a ledge. A descending traverse on the ledge gets you to the belay at the base of the nice 5.8 crack. This start protects much better than the normal one, and goes at about 5.6 or 5.7. You do have to remember to place some gear for your second on the traverse. Long John Wall is a great climb.
Climbed on 11.11.01- Really good route- 1st pitch is scary though. I foung some gear, #0.5 Camalot, right before the notch, definitely spooky. The traverse back right I skipped. With long slings, you can go 10-15ft farther left, get a placement and move back to the belay all well protected. Long slings are needed w/o rope drag would be terrible. Remainder of route is excellent!!
With a "stretchy" anchor and a 60m rope, both P1 and P2 can be combined as well as P3, P4, and P5 to make this a two pitch route. Never the less, combining the last three can give you a bit of rope drag that may be unpleasant.
We climbed this yesterday (St. Patty's Day). The first pitch is indeed scary. Squeezing through the slot was tricky. The hands aren't bad but there's nowhere to put that left foot! I agree that the rating is soft for that pitch and it DOES deserve an S rating. Even if you didn't deck there, falling from those moves would be a serious matter.
That being said, the rest of the route was outstanding. The 5.7 roof was a blast and the P3 crux was great, although I thought it was harder than 5.8.
If someone has their dog tied to the tree at the base of the 1st pitch, and it won't let you start the climb...you can start about 30-40 feet right, and traverse in to the left. Its a moderate scramble, but, dont put too much gear in or you'd probably have some rope drag. Better yet, the party ahead of you could leave the loud, mad dog at home. or at least make some sort of helmet for him/her!
This route can be done in 2 pitches with a 60m rope. (P1)Go all the way to the ramp above the crux roof. Keep pro, rope as staright as possibe or use slings to keep drag to a minimum. The second might have to start a few feet up on the ramp above the ground-a full 60m. (P2) Go to the top-about 58m pitch. Enjoy!
Most people condense this climb into 2 long 5.8 pitches, and a short 5th class pitch from the large upper ledge to summit. For added quality and another 5.8 pitch try PLUTO. Go right from the large upper ledge into wide block filled slot with tree, this deadends at a headwall with 2 pegs. Stem up, then blind moves left gains final [picturesque] arete.
We did an interesting variation on P1 thats probably even scarier than the proper line. From the sloping ramp above the good ledge that continues from the 'squeeze', we went left and up rather than traversing to the right. I'm not sure why we did it, because its probably less secure and only protected in the pychological sense, but it goes. You start by placing a #2 or 1 RP in a slight fissure, then go up using the sloping ramp for your feet, then place a #0 or 1 Alien in a horizontal fissure/incut edge to your left, and then go straight up to some dirty but substancial holds, approaching the belay ledge from the left. It might actually be fun climbing if it gets cleaned up a bit...but still scary with ramp-decking potential if the gear pulls (which is probable). I'd call it 7ish.
I highly recommend the variation mentioned above for the first pitch (1st pitch of Ignominity). It avoids the scary slot and traverse as well as the minefield of poison ivy at the base and up the main crack. But most of all, it is quite enjoyable, more in character with the rest of the climb. Most favorite part was the roof on pitch 2 (this version will most definitely require a belay at the base of the superb crack, unless you can solo the start), and, yup, a big cam protects it well.
Roger, sorry I told you that was a 3.5 BD cam (all silver) for the roof on the 1st pitch. You placed the 3.0 (blue and silver). If you use Metolius its a 9 (maroon). The 3.5 is just a little too big. You can also get in a bomber nut!
First off, yeah, that slopey traverse is a nutty one. I, too, got in an RP at waist level so if I feel I would hit the ledge, not much more unless the RP popped (can't imagine that happening!). My partner said he was worried about my nut placements, but he sure as hell didn't lead that section! Anyway, what I'm really about here is the red alien I dropped from the upper pitches. Coming out underneath the bulge on the crux section, and jamming around it I must have mis-clipped as I unplaced the piece and attempted to put it away. My guess is that it's somewhere on the middle ledge, lying in dust with the purple Petzl Draw still attached. If anyone sees it, please contact me. Well, good climb! But yes, the first pitch should get an S...if not for "serious" then at least for "screwy" cause that's more what it is.peace
By Ernie Port From: Boulder, Colorado Sep 28, 2002 rating: 5.85b16VI-15HVS 4c
One of my top 5 favorites in the canyon for the grade. The position at the top is hard to beat, as views of other walls in all directions are unique and interesting.
This climb can be easily done in two pitches. My partner and I did this on 9/12/02 and we didnt need a" stretchy" anchor and my rope was not a full 60 meters. Before doing the traverse back into the crack on the first pitch, run a very long sling from your nut or RP placement then you will have no drag to the top of the second pitch. Same thing for the last two pitches, run longer slings and draws.
There are several ways to do the traverse right on the first pitch. You can go straight up by the RP placement, then down and right. This is the route taken by the climber in the 3rd action photo below. A less obvious but I think easier way is to traverse lower, with your feet on the large horizontal ledge 6' below the RP, visible well below the climber in the 3rd photo. After placing the RP, step back down the belly crawl ramp a few feet and stem right from a nice horn onto this ledge. There aren't any good handholds, but you don't need much. Step right and you are quickly in the nice, easy dihedral. I'm not sure I would rate either of these ways 5.5, but the latter is over very quickly.
This climb is my favorite 5.8 in Eldo and a blast to do as two pitches!
Massive poison ivy grove near ground belay, with the nasty plant growing 20-25 feet up the first pitch. I was [disappointed] to not try this infamous belly crawl on my first go at LJW. We opted for the nice [Ignomimity] start which was fun but would probably cause trouble running 1st 2 pitches together. What a grand tour this climb is, fingers to arm bars, jugs and roofs. [I'm] not sure 5.8 gets more fun.
I am not sure where you need a #4 Friend on this route. A #3.5 Friend or a #3 Camalot will protect the roof on P2 and can be placed right before the wide spot on the P4 crux. That being said, the std. P4 crux is harder than many of the Eldo 5.9s that I have been on.
There is a bomber RP before you traverse right on P1. Try and get something in after the ~5.7 move to the good ledge, your second will appreciate it. There is potential to slam into the dihedral, if your second messes up the move next to the RP.
You can place the #4 Camalot (or Friend?) in the wide section of the crux dihedral (P4 if you are not linking anything). It is not needed, but it would shorten the fall potential of a pumped leader who was trying to lieback the whole section. I stemmed that whole section, which is technical and exhausting on the feet, but easy on the arms. If you like to sew your lead up with big, bomber gear (who doesn't?), you'll be glad you brought it. If you can't stand carrying a piece up a climb only to use it once, then stick with just the #3 Camalot, which is definitely useful in a few places. Pitch one? If you are a solid 5.9 leader, you will enjoy that pitch and think it is "spicy" in retrospect. If you are a 5.6 leader, you are going to be sweating bullets and probably just feel glad you survived it. Put the stronger leader on this pitch. Although it is almost as dangerous to follow as lead this pitch probably, I would think a fall seconding this pitch would be unlikely.
Did this climb again the other day, and I have some more comments to add. First of all, it seems everybody here is really into weight training, because they all seem to think lugging along the big cams is of use. We did this entire climb without placing anything bigger than a #2 Camalot even though we had a #4. I felt the roof could be protected really well with the #2 and that's really the biggest place for gear on the entire climb. Granted, there is some space below the second crux (P4), but I think you can get away with the White Alien or even smaller pieces placed further back.
Secondly, I hate to comment about grades, but I feel like P4 warrants somewhat of a discussion. I opted for a mix of layback and stem, stemming when placing and laybacking to move, and I found it as thoroughly exhausting as wrestling a bear. It's short, which is why I think it only gets a 5.8, but if you've climbed Gorilla's Delight in Boulder Canyon, I think you'll agree that this pitch rivals it in difficulty.
In this route description, the pitch I speak of as being 'more difficult than the rating' is the crux top of the third pitch.
I also [want] to clarify something I feel needs clarification in all discussions of route grade: When I say that the route is harder than graded I don't mean that it is graded wrongly necessarily. Twenty years ago this route may have been a 5.7. Today, however, things have considerably changed. I don't [know why] this is, but it is. So, while Gorilla's Delight gets 5.9+ this gets 5.8.
Both of the cruxes on these climbs are extremely short, in that there is no real climbing above or beneath them. On Long John Wall you can link the crux with the lower pitch or you can run it from the start of the crux to the top of the climb. Either way you do it, you have considerable rests before and after the crux on both climbs. I have climbed easier 5.9's and harder 5.7's and 5.8's, for whatever reason.
In summation, what I am trying to do is give the difficulty of this climb a context that many climbs do not get in their grading. If the average 5.8 leader is looking for the average 5.8, he'll have to see if the definition of this 5.8 matches his definition of average 5.8.
The reason 1960s routes seem underrated is because back then 5.14 didn't exist. Since there wasn't such robust rating scale, people were understandably conservative in assigning ratings. But this climb is 5.8 by today's trad standards. There's nothing on it that requires techniques or strength exceeding 5.8 standards if you make the right call on the choice of technique at each crux.
This climb was originally rated 5.8-circa 1970. Its a burly 2nd and 3rd pitches, eh?
By Ron Olsen From: Boulder, CO Oct 22, 2003 rating: 5.85b16VI-15HVS 4c
Having done this climb many times, I feel that the best start is Break On Through: climb the layback corner, up a ramp, turn the overhanging corner on the left, and traverse left to the first belay on LJW. This adds a quality 5.8 pitch and avoids the poison ivy and groveling on the standard start. The Ignominity start is OK, but the Break On Through start is stellar.
The descent can be done in two rappels with a 60m rope. The second rap uses all of the rope; angle left for the best landing spot. From here, head uphill on the broken ledge and scramble down to the trail.
This is my first post to climbingboulder, though I have consulted it many times. Had to chuckle when I read the guidelines for posting a comment ("don't be a jerk").
Anyway, climbed this route on Sunday. I led the first pitch of Ignominity, heading left after the mid-point tree instead of right--as indicated by the white dotted line in the route photo on this site. My partner led P2. Thought something was most amiss until I found the JUG on the P2 roof. I led the last three in one fell swoop with about 5 meters of rope to spare (on a 60m rope). The thing I'll always remember about this route is topping out to a spectacular, panoramic view of Red Garden Wall.
Nowthen, the real reason for my post. On the standard descent (i.e., three raps via slung trees just north of the route) the second tree down--a deadish Juniper, if memory serves--creaked louder than a rusty hinge when my partner and I weighted the rope. I was talking nice to the tree until we reached terra firma. I know it's probably the fastest way down but next time I'm going a different way.
Comments regarding the rap off: The second tree [definitely] makes a lot of noise, creaking popping etc... as you rap off. Secondly, I used a 60-m rope and it does not reach the ground from the second rap tree-Knot your rope. It takes you to a ledge 20 feet above the trail from which you can down climb easily to the west.
If you walk south a short ways from the finish of the climb you can rap from the anchors at the top of Washington Irving.
First rap is from a slung block with a steel cable. Second is from two fat bolts that will get you to the ledge at the bottom of Washington Irving, Chanti, Unsaid, etc. with a 60M rope. You wind up about 50 feet from your pack and don't have to rap from trees.
The only problem might be if there is traffic below you on W.I. for the second rap.
By Ernie Port From: Boulder, Colorado May 22, 2005 rating: 5.85b16VI-15HVS 4c
I lead 2 friends up this the other day who had not been on this before and on the P1 traverse, one of them peeled off at the first move onto the ledge, swinging/slamming down into the right corner sustaining a nasty knee abrasion. Several years ago when I lead this, I put a solid #3 BD nut in the tiny crack at the start of the traverse. The crack has flared a bit and that nut did not fit like I remember, so I opted for a tipped out black alien as nothing else I had fit.My 2nd left the alien in as a directional for our 3rd member and it ripped out when he fell. He looked up at me like it was my fault that the piece ripped and he swung so far, but hey, if it were just he and I climbing, he would of had to pull it anyway and probably suffered the same consequences...it is a thoughtful little 5.6 move getting up on the ledge but not that bad.Our 3rd member avoided this move and the lower ramp traverse by going farther left and then up and over right... without incident.They both struggled over the roof on P2, and we all agreed that the crack leading up to the roof is more (7)ish and the roof is more like (8) favoring taller people with longer arms like myself.The rest of the climb was enjoyable and we all nailed the crux dihedral. IMO the upper crux is a bit pumpy towards the end so I punched thru the last 15' without stopping for any placements. This might have been where a #4 cam would have fit nicely, but I left mine back at the truck. I brought doubles of the #2 & #3 cam which were nice to have, but not necessary, as I've done this before without them.This route is in my top 3 5.8's in the canyon and best on west ridge for the grade in IMHO...
My partner Kevin and I agree that the roof on P2 goes harder than the Rossiter-suggested 5.7, sequencing aside. If the fingerlocks were 6" closer to the lip of the roof, it MIGHT be a 5.7, but that's not why I comment here. For the P1 traverse: on a sunny day with blue skies, if you look up at the pitch from the ground before leading, a "secret" green-alien placement will reveal itself to you. JUST as you get done with the belly-crawl, over the bulge toward the ground is a nice green-alien placement. Also, lead this on two ropes! You can REALLY protect your second well if you do. Lead on one rope only until you start the traverse, then on the other rope until you traverse back left at the top of the traditional first pitch. At this point, your first rope should nearly be in line with the green-alien from below and a swing is less likely to occur. I think I've explained this well, but if not, e-mail me and I'll try again.
Did the Break On Through start on Sunday and I'll have to agree with Ron, that's the way to go by far. It's fun and well protected. Besides who would trade in a crappy 5.5 for a stellar 5.8? Also, the rap tree atop P3 still creaks and makes a lot of noise when rappeling. Be careful!
The "creaking rap tree" that everyone is freaking out about is just fine. That sound you are hearing is only the frictional noise of the webbing vibrating on the bark, and some of the loose bark crackles as you rap. the tree is solid. Currently the webbing is in good condition. There are certainly plenty of worse tree anchors in Eldo that need more attention.
Had a great time climbing this two weeks ago! Couple of things: On the first pitch after the "belly crawl" you can go straight up on holds along a left slanting crack (be aware: I managed to wiggle in a black Alien but otherwise you're looking at hitting the ledge if you blow the sequence). Maybe 5.8ish?
Also, at the roof on the second pitch I went on an adventure (because I'm a moron and got off route) way out left along a fingertip undercling with bad feet underneath the huge roof. A little crumbly from no use...but solid pro all the way to another crack heading up (where I realized I was off route). Could be a possible more difficult variation, though I didn't try out the crack.
Great route, it was way too hot today but we climbed anyway. I thought I was going to be seriously injured on the first pitch, come on is an S rating really out of the question? I fished in some awkward nut once out of the belly crawl but like mentioned before there is no left feet and it is scary as hell to commit with a nasty ground fall in mind. Once I got a nut in up left of the crawl, I got a multi-directional RP set to traverse back right (probably would hold better then the crap to be placed in the crawl). This was fun, big time rope drag created but I feld kinda safe unless any piece was to rip.
Combined p1-2, which was the way to go minus the rope drag, would recommend not doing the origional start. P3-5 I also combined with way less rope drag then the first 2 zig zaging pitches. I found the route superb once you reached the first 5.8 section all the way to the top, don't do it in the hot summer sun though because there is no escape.
Oh and the rap route is still fine, some of the slings look brand new.
Good route for the West Ridge. 1st pitch is awkward, but a great thread before the ugly moves gives good protection. So yes, an S rating is out of the question. After the crawl, you can place another good piece before heading back right into the crack which you can sew up as much as you want.
This climb has about 60' of nice climbing spread out over 300', but with great belay ledges, it works out well for the casual climber not looking for too much excitement.
The trees and rap anchors are in good shape. Yes, something creaked in the juniper, but I think it was the sling rubbing on the bark? It is not a small tree. With a 60m rope, you can get down far enough that you can swing left to the ground and walk off. Just run along the rocks to your left. No need for the third rap.
Did the first pitch of "Break on Through", and it is a stellar bit of climbing that protects well. There are two ways of doing the initial roof move. If you can find the easier sequence, go for it! Overall, I found this route to be all of 5.8. Well worth doing with lots of variety. Hmm, not sure about above comment. If this is casual at the grade, what is serious? Guess climbing is a relative business. For me, a casual 5.8 would be some of the sport climbing walk ups at say "Watermark" in Boulder Canyon. Our party of 4 were all pretty experienced climbers, and I think it had us all thinking in more than one spot.
As you top out on pitch 2 at the top of the gully there is a flatish 3'x 3' 300 lb. rock on the left you want to reach for. It is not a good idea. It is just sitting on the ledge and I think (paranoid?) it has moved toward the gully since I was last here a year ago. If this thing goes...
The 5.8 variation to P4 mentioned in the route description above sounds like a variation named "Pluto" that Dakers Gowans and I climbed in 1974. It's the bottomless corner to the right of the regular finish, visible and appealing from the road. If there are fixed pitons here they came long after the first ascent; we did it hammerless.
By Stich From: Colorado Springs, Colorado Aug 13, 2007
I did the awkward slot start and didn't care for the poorly protected step up to get into the crack. So I went left along that rotten band into P1 of Ignominity like suggested above. Climbed the 5.8 first pitch of "Break on Through" and like it the most for a start. You can rejoin Long John at a broken ledge band.
For the descent, there are now two bolted anchors with rap rings in place of the slings around the trees. If you have a 70m rope, you can do two raps and walk off up hill a short way. Otherwise, it is three raps with the last one being a slingfest on a tree.
This weekend, the two trees that have been used for rappels for the descent from Sooberb, Long John Wall, etc., have been replaced with camouflaged double bolt anchors. The first set of anchors from the ledge near the top of the cliff are on the slab just left of the tree and easy to overlook. This location was the best spot for the anchors given the quality of the rock and the pull.
By Matt Richardson Administrator From: Longmont, CO Apr 14, 2008 rating: 5.85b16VI-15HVS 4c
Pitch for pitch, this is an excellent climb. I am not sure where Patrick gets his 60' of good climbing over 100'. I felt that the route was consistent throughout. Especially if you do the first pitch of Break on Through. That being said, this is probably not the best route for a green 8 climber.
Roof crux on P2 was fun, but it took me a good 10 minutes to figure it out. Thought that was a good pitch. Pro is adequate but not really plentiful on this climb.
Didn't feel the love on the Break on Through start. The lieback part is good if you're into that kind of thing, but the crux requires a kinda wild move over the roof, or some tenuous 5.9 groveling on a cruddy, poorly protected seam.
Descent - Downclimb a deep V-Slot just to the north. Scramble just North of the large Juniper trees to find a camouflaged double bolt anchor. Rap number 2 is at the top of P1 of Sooberb. This rap will take you to a bench that you can walk off to the North if you angle the rope left (North). (60 meter rope, 2 rappels)
The last pitch has a potentially loose block (about the size of a somewhat narrow sofa cushion). It moved significantly when I was on it. I believe I may have been off route slightly, but it is in a rotten band that goes up to the left just under the top. I ended up completing the route around to the right, thereby avoiding the block. In any case, it would land near or on the belayer if dislodged.
After the traverse left on P1, we climbed that face straight up instead of traversing back right. Is this by any chance a named variation? Grade? It was harder than the traverse right and protected with a TCU. Fun and would recommend it if you want to climb a variation.
Did this yesterday and felt that the crux of the route was the roof on pitch two. My partner disagreed, but we realized that we took completely different approaches. I used an airy, bouldery sequence that involved some no-feet dynoing and a pretty technical mantle, and avoided the crack altogether. I would call these V3-V4 moves which translates into what...something like 5.10? It was hard and scary, but pretty interesting, and super fun. Any time you get a chance to throw a heel-hook or hang exposed by one hand on a small crimp while trad leading merits a smile, in my book.
I loved the whole route. The upper cruxy finger crack was beautiful and a little complicated, and presented classic Eldo sequencing.
By Robert Buswold From: Longmont, CO Mar 7, 2012 rating: 5.85b16VI-15HVS 4c
Didn't mess with the crappy P1 start... instead did Ignonimity to P1 of LJW and beyond. Linked the first 2 pitches together, and then linked the last 3 for a 2 pitch climb with a 60m rope. Just seems like a huge waste of time to do it in 5 pitches, as long as you use some shoulder-length slings, rope drag isn't too bad. Anyway, loved every minute of it, this is one of my favorite 5.8s in the canyon!
By Robert Buswold From: Longmont, CO Mar 11, 2012 rating: 5.85b16VI-15HVS 4c
Hey guys, my partner and I were climbing below you on LJW today (3-11-12) when you dropped the Alien cam. It didn't hit anyone, but some guys on the trail yelled up to my partner to let you know that it landed on a rock after that drop. You might not want to use it any more. I didn't see it laying at the base when I came back down, so I'm guessing you were able to retrieve it.
This route, with the Break On Through start, is my favorite 5.8 I've done in Eldo. It's pretty consistent the whole way and has great views of the Redgarden Wall from the summit. The Break On Through first pitch seems like a more logical start to the route as it has a more direct line, better protection, and better climbing.
Seventh time climbing - the Break on Through start was a bit of a shock to the system I think. But once I got into the stemming made for a really enjoyable climb. Traverses also a little nerve wracking but can be well protected. Glad for the cruisy last two pitches (of 4) to the summit.
By Tombo From: Boulder Aug 24, 2013 rating: 5.85b16VI-15HVS 4c
The best part of this climb is the epic, epic belay station at the very top. I can't believe nobody has mentioned the little notch at the summit with a sweeping view of Redgarden/Boulder on one side and the west side of Eldorado Canyon on the other. Plus, you get to sling natural pro in weird rock and sit back and chill. Also, should you find yourself rappelling in the dark, the free-hanging second rappel into pitch blackness is insane. It makes you feel like Batman. Do this climb.
Did P1 of Break On Through all the way to the broken band. Great. Required some thought on P1 (did not lieback). P2 crux - we used a #4 Camalot. Verrry thoughtful for 5.8, so I rate it 8+. May as well run P2 all the way to the notch with STELLAR views of Redgarden. The 2 rap stations to the N are easy to find. Watch your rope ends, scramble N after 2 raps to the trail.