Gothics South Face / Gothic Arch approach
|
I'm considering heading out to climb Gothic Arch this weekend. |
|
I have not done any of the routes you are discussing, but think you may find this link to the Lawyer/Haas guide helpful as it is an aerial photo of South face Gothics with routes and raps overlaid on it. Enjoy your climb. |
|
Thanks. I've got the Lawyer/Haas book. They recommend the bushwhack to the base. But that was written before Irene, and I'm wondering if the cost/benefit has changed (or if their opinion was not universal to begin with.) |
|
We did the arch route a few weeks ago, and 1 70m worked fine. The approach is the crux, with about 7 miles and 4000' elevation coupled with some route finding on the descent. Can't speak for the rap - I hear it is a little exposed to get out there - we did the descent gully based on the Lawyer book's direction. |
|
Direct South Face has a rap; route 8 in this photo adirondackrock.com/goodies/… |
|
Jon and Chris, thank you both very much. |
|
a little brushing couldn't hurt, especially on the lower-angle pitches. |
|
i recommend the bushwack as it is very straightforward and really quite easy. Just did it earlier this summer. |
|
i was just there on Wednesday/Thursday. The Routes had a lot of dripping water from the remnants of Hurricane whatever. Apparently it rained pretty hard there tuesday (a few inches). We planned on doing the Gothic Arch route but opted for Goodwin after getting shut down because of extreme wetness. I climbed most of the first pitch of Gothic Arch and had a issues with a move (a better climber would probably have done it). I opted to bail off some gear because the second pitch was almost navigable (in a boat) and we had no idea of the situation on pitch 3 (with the easy grade long runout). A side note, our "bounce test" of the bail anchor exploded some rock on the first test (about 5 or 6 bounces). We worked our way up the "third class" terrain of Goodwin and then moved along on the next few pitches. The second to last pitch (shared with Gothic arch) was spicy as heck. There is a lot of Lichen, moss, poor gear and wet rock. In better conditions, this would have felt more comparable to the grade. I opted for a line that went more towards the right of the slide and approached the headwalls over some pocketed rock (PG13 gear). There was heavy rain there on Thursday, which probably did not improve conditions. All in all the Goodwin Route was a fun alternative to the Gothic Arch. The climbing was exposed, runout, heady, wet, and dirty as hell. Somewhere in all of that there was some quality rock. I couldn't have asked for a better challenge and more rewarding experience. Playing alpine is a game with rules that change by the situation. Goodwin route was the perfect test in this game. I can't wait to get back to complete Gothic Arch one day. Have fun and feel free to booty my gear (pitch 1 Gothic Arch). |
|
Don, |
|
We opted for the hike in approach. It was straight forward and took one hour. There was one section that we wrapped a cordelette around a tree to descend over. everything else was reasonable. water should not be an issue as there were numerous flows. The bushwhack over teh col follows an intermittent stream. If the SF is shining (wet rock) then you should be good to go on water in the col/bushwhack |
|
Great info for future reference. Thanks, Rob. |
|
Gothic Arch- You should bushwack down to the base and then climb out. It is straightforward. If you use the Direct South Face (DSF) rappel you a) will be rappeling in with all your gear and probably not saving any time since the start of the bushwack and the start of the rappel are not near each other at all and the top out of the Gothic Arch and the start of the rappel are not near each other either if you were thinking about leaving any hiking gear at the top. b) you will have to down climb from the bottom of the last rappel of the DSF and if you are planning on climbing Gothic Arch and not the DSF you probably will not feel comfortable doing this. |