By Rob Gordon From Hollywood, CA Aug 20, 2012
| Stepped on the scale yesterday and it rang up 198. Good god. That's like 30 pounds above my ideal weight for climbing. I'm still able to climb around V5, but certainly I'm about two grades off from my personal bests, and forget certain problems that require extreme finess on tiny holds. Got me thinking. Who here weighs over 190-200 and is able to climb, let's say, V7+ or 5.13+. Not talking onsight, just two or three sessions for the send. Can it be done?? Any famous climbers who are this heavy and crushing? |  FLAG |
By Peter Franzen Administrator From Phoenix, AZ Aug 20, 2012
| Klem Loskot always seemed to be on the bigger end of the spectrum. He isn't fat of course, but I would guess that he is in the 190-200lb range. |  FLAG |
By JCM From Golden, CO Aug 20, 2012
| Nothing tastes as good as sending feels. |  FLAG |
By Burt Lindquist Administrator From Madison, WI Aug 20, 2012
| Johnny Dawes! Brit hard man climber who likes his plate full at dinner time! |  FLAG |
By Rob Gordon From Hollywood, CA Aug 20, 2012
| Jon Moen wrote: Nothing tastes as good as sending feels. Beer sure comes close though. |  FLAG |
By FrankPS From Atascadero, CA Aug 20, 2012
| This thread wouldn't be complete without mentioning beefy Don Whilans. |  FLAG |
By Rick Mix Aug 20, 2012
| If we're going to pick on Brits that are beefy and climb hard there has to be mention of John Dunne. Burly man that sends burly routes. |  FLAG |
By Blake Cash Aug 20, 2012
| Jon...you and I both know that Nutella tastes way better than any route sent in Rifle. Don't lie. |  FLAG |
By slim Aug 20, 2012
| Burt Lindquist wrote: Johnny Dawes! Brit hard man climber who likes his plate full at dinner time! johnny dawes? are you sure you're not thinking of john dunne? i don't remember dawes being that big. john dunne is the obvious choice. hard scary runout 5.14 at 220+ lbs. even his RP's were scared. |  FLAG |
By Burt Lindquist Administrator From Madison, WI Aug 20, 2012
| Whoops! Slim your correct. I was meaning to indicate Johnny Dunne. My bad.. was typing too quick from my desk at work and F''''d that up... |  FLAG |
By steve edwards From SLC, UT Aug 20, 2012
| Unfortunately most of these claims are exaggerated, weight wise. Lots of 200+ climb 5.13. Not too many 5.14 though that will undoubtably change as 5.14 because less close to the limit. Dunne was huge, sometimes, but he famously lost heaps of weight for his sends--like 30-40 pounds!--and was nowhere near 200 for his hard routes. Loskot is bigger than most, so he's rad, but I'll bet he's never eclipsed 2 bills either and certainly not when climbing his hardest routes. Nalle's probably 140 soaking wet. Sharma's actually the biggest climber I know at the top of the sport climbing game currently. I think it was Stevie Haston who said something like sport climbing wasn't interesting because all that mattered was how good you could get at not eating. |  FLAG |
By MountainManny From Idaho Springs Aug 20, 2012
| Rob Gordon wrote: Beer sure comes close though. ....Or in the case of being +30> Bacon would seem more likely |  FLAG |
By Rob Gordon From Hollywood, CA Aug 20, 2012
| MountainManny wrote: ....Or in the case of being +30> Bacon would seem more likely Haha. No. It's the beer. I probably average an extra 5000 calories a week in beer. The other factors are I stopped playing rugby for a while, so my cardio went down and so did my metabolism. I used to eat probably 30-50 percent more than I do now, but I just burn way less now. Also stopped being a vegetarian, so my muscles all got way bigger. Unfortunately my legs and ass naturally get bigger than my upper body. |  FLAG |
By Woodchuck ATC Aug 20, 2012
| Saw a guy who must have been 240 and 5'9", belaying a guy who was also near 220. Leading smoothly on 5.10 is pretty impressive in my opinion. I was doubtful they could get off the ground when I saw them in Muir Valley, RRG last week. |  FLAG |
By Russ Walling From www.FishProducts.com Aug 20, 2012
| Since when is 200+ fat? Everyone I know is 200+ and they all climb (that would be lead "trad") at least 5.10. Anything under 200lbs is cheating unless you are an 8a.nu posterchild |  FLAG |
By Eric D From Flagstaff, AZ Aug 20, 2012
| Russ Walling wrote: Since when is 200+ fat? Everyone I know is 200+ and they all climb (that would be lead "trad") at least 5.10. Anything under 200lbs is cheating unless you are an 8a.nu posterchild It all depends on height and frame obviously, but I would think that most people over 200 are overweight. |  FLAG |
By Mike Lane From Centennial, CO Aug 20, 2012
| Just had an epiphany: for every 5 lbs. over 190 you get a letter grade handicap. At 210 that goes straight to a letter per pound. Since we all *basically* have the same fingers, it makes sense if you're pulling an extra 40 up on each hand. I'm gonna roll with that from now on. It also means I climbed a .12B yesterday |  FLAG |
By pfwein Aug 20, 2012
| Russ Walling wrote: Since when is 200+ fat? Everyone I know is 200+ and they all climb (that would be lead "trad") at least 5.10. Anything under 200lbs is cheating unless you are an 8a.nu posterchild Must be some lovely ladies in that crew! |  FLAG |
By skeeter From Lakewood CA Aug 20, 2012
| I got married last December and am up 30lbs (191 and consider myself fat), affects my climbing when I'm on the wall dreaming about bacon. |  FLAG |
By Dylan Colon From Eugene, OR Aug 20, 2012
| What about Dean Potter among the bigger climbers (not fat though, by any stretch). I believe that in First Ascent Steph Davis remarks that catching a 190 lb Dean Potter as he takes a 50 footer isn't that fun. |  FLAG |
By Stephen Nance From Boulder, CO Aug 20, 2012
| huge difference between V7 climbing and 5.13+ climbing..... I am 6'6 200 lbs, and sent my first V10 this summer, however my best on a rope is 8a....(13b)... 13+ is no joke... |  FLAG |
By JCM From Golden, CO Aug 21, 2012
| Blake Cash wrote: Jon...you and I both know that Nutella tastes way better than any route sent in Rifle. Don't lie. Truth. I recently spent an afternoon in the Arsenal doing zero climbing, and instead opted to sit around and enjoy my favorite new fat kid snack: Nutella on animal crackers. |  FLAG |
By Eric Coffman Aug 21, 2012
| I'm the largest climber I know who regularly climbs. I see people my size climb but not often and I rarely see them at the crag more than once. That is just my experience.
| Eric Coffman 6 ft 4 200 lbs leading "itchy flutterby" 5.11b Submitted By: Eric Coffman on Aug 21, 2012
| |  FLAG |
By Crypply Aug 21, 2012
| i don't know anyone in the 190-200 lbs range who climbs super hard, but i know a lot in the 180ish range who climb v9 or 10 and 13+. |  FLAG |
By Greg D From Here Aug 21, 2012
| Why do I love Climbing. When I'm lean and fit I can climb near my limit. When I'm fat and out of shape I can climb near my limit. I find climbing most challenging and most rewarding when I'm near my limit. I'll spare you the grades but a few years ago I was climbing and training a bunch. I was the fittest and leanest I had been in ten years and weighed 190, climbed the hardest routes I've ever done. I loved the rock. I loved the mountain. I wanted to hug the mountain. Then, work, knee surgery, and life happened. I stopped working out, climbed very little and put on twenty pounds. Today, I weigh 210, climb near my limit which is several grades lower than two years ago and I love the rock, I love the mountain,I want to hug the mountain. |  FLAG |
By Greg D From Here Aug 21, 2012
| Eric Coffman wrote: I'm the largest climber I know who regularly climbs. I see people my size climb but not often and I rarely see them at the crag more than once. That is just my experience. You must hang out at sport crags only. I crap bigger than you. |  FLAG |
|