Login with Facebook
 ADVANCED
Double Cross Discussion
View Latest Posts in This Forum or All Forums
Page 6 of 23.  <<First   <Prev   4  5  6  7  8   Next>   Last>>
Follow replies to this topic? Notify me at the top of web site.
1

Email me.
 
Dec 15, 2010
Colonel Mustard
Murf wrote:
Another hint, the 'Z' is capitalized.

Sigh. You just tell the jokes louder after people don't laugh at them, don't you? like a child...
Colonel Mustard
Joined Sep 13, 2005
1,379 points
Dec 15, 2010
Ryan Williams wrote:
I also think that sometimes it is better to just tell people the way it is: "That's not a good reason to rock climb." "It sounds like you'd have more fun if you just stayed at the gym." "You don't have the skill set to be here and if you keep it up you are going to get hurt or dead."


Wow. I mean, wow. It sounds like you'd have more fun if you got a sense of perspective.

Since you think that sometimes it is better to just tell people the way it is:

This has to be one of the most pompous, self-satisfied and frankly nauseating things I have ever read on the internet. And I've been on the Supertopo forum so I'm no stranger to nauseating pomposity.

Ryan Williams wrote:
There are just too many people out there that don't get it...and it's ruining climbing.


I thought that Jack Marshall had destroyed climbing in N. America 15-20 years ago, no?

Although for me, personally, what's 'ruining climbing' is the internet; it offers far too great an audience to irritating, inadequate nonentities. (Not that I'm suggesting that you're an irritating, inadequate nonentity - that would be counter to Guideline #1 - I mean just general irritating inadequate nonentities.)


Ryan Williams wrote:
When I get the chance to tell those people how it is... I do so.


Yep, I'll just bet you do. You can probably barely hide the little frisson of excitement as you "...tell those people how it is". Do you run a climbing Meetup group, by any chance? (Either that or this is a troll, and I doff my hat to a unusually original example of the art.)

Ryan Williams wrote:
When ever I say something I seem to get the cold shoulder.


This in no way surprises me.
Captain Fastrousers
From Pasadena, CA
Joined Jan 26, 2009
1 points
Dec 15, 2010
Ryan Kelly wrote:
Measured from the gear to the ground, or from the gear to the top of the pile of dead bodies?


You're supposed to remove the dead bodies, otherwise it counts as aid. Or as a boulder pad. In any case, those mouldering cadavers clearly represent the pussification of American climbing.

What's next? Boulder pads beneath Clean & Jerk? Head stands at the base of O'Kelleys?

This is what's ruining climbing, people.
Captain Fastrousers
From Pasadena, CA
Joined Jan 26, 2009
1 points
Dec 15, 2010
Captain Fastrousers wrote:
You're supposed to remove the dead bodies, otherwise it counts as aid. Or as a boulder pad. In any case, those mouldering cadavers clearly represent the pussification of American climbing. What's next? Boulder pads beneath Clean & Jerk? Head stands at the base of O'Kelleys? This is what's ruining climbing, people.


I'm confused. Is the Internet ruining climbing? Or using piles of dead bodies as cheatstones? Did Jack even leave anything to be ruined?
Snupe
From SoCak
Joined Jun 6, 2010
26 points
Dec 15, 2010
Snupe wrote:
I'm confused. Is the Internet ruining climbing?

Only for me; for others I suspect the internet is what makes the whole endeavor worthwhile.

Snupe wrote:
Did Jack even leave anything to be ruined?


Apparently he left Double Cross to still be ruined.

And Big Mo.
Captain Fastrousers
From Pasadena, CA
Joined Jan 26, 2009
1 points
Dec 15, 2010
berl wrote:
yes, it is an elaborate joke


You mean there aren't really a pair of shiny new bolts to protect the start? Crap... that blows my plan for this weekend - get out to JTree early Sat before Murf made it out there Saturday morning.

berl wrote:
but I'm curious about one piece of information: exactly how far is it, really, to the first good gear on this thing?


Maybe 20' if you skip some options on the 5.4 R/X slab leading to the base of the vertical crack.
Adam Kimmerly
Joined Feb 28, 2005
493 points
Dec 15, 2010
Colonel Mustard
The lil Brit has spoken! Colonel Mustard
Joined Sep 13, 2005
1,379 points
Dec 15, 2010
Captain Fastrousers wrote:
Head stands at the base of O'Kelleys?


People are standing on heads at the base of O'Kelley's?? Now that's just obnoxious!
twinAgent
Joined Dec 15, 2010
0 points
Dec 15, 2010
Colonel Mustard
twinAgent wrote:
People are standing on heads at the base of O'Kelley's?? Now that's just obnoxious!



Ryan is one of the walking dead.

Ah me, ruining jokes left and right.
Colonel Mustard
Joined Sep 13, 2005
1,379 points
Dec 15, 2010
Zeke wrote:
The lil Brit has spoken!


Right on cue; Zeke heard about irritating inadequate nonentities and assumed he was part of the discussion.
Captain Fastrousers
From Pasadena, CA
Joined Jan 26, 2009
1 points
Dec 15, 2010
Colonel Mustard
Captain Fastrousers wrote:
Right on cue; Zeke heard about irritating inadequate nonentities and assumed he was part of the discussion.


What does the Wheel o' Zings say?

You're right though, I really shouldn't belittle you.
Colonel Mustard
Joined Sep 13, 2005
1,379 points
Dec 15, 2010
My kinda simian
Zeke wrote:
Ryan is one of the walking dead. Ah me, ruining jokes left and right.



These people are ruining climbing.
Ryan Kelly
From work.
Joined Oct 10, 2006
3,262 points
Dec 15, 2010
Snupe wrote:
Did Jack even leave anything to be ruined?



He ruined this beautiful splitter
He ruined this beautiful splitter
duh
Joined Dec 27, 2006
1,692 points
Dec 15, 2010
Black Mountain
Bryan Gohn wrote:
Chopping a bolt does not alter or damage the rock, it's just the removal of hardware that was installed in the rock. The unaesthetic hole that remains afterward was drilled by the bolter, not the chopper. Retrobolters and defenders of retrobolters can try to spin it any way they want, but just because someone can't magically make the rock new again after chopping a bolt, doesn't change the fact that it was the bolter who did the damage.


Hey Bryan if your going to quote me at least keep it in context. I don't defend retrobolters nor do I retrobolt myself. What I said was that I hate seeing the aftermath of a bolt war. Holes everywhere and so on and so forth. What I was asking is that choppers think twice before they chop; the same as bolters should think twice before they bolt.

P.S. This entire thread is out of control at this point. After skimming through it I feel like I'm back in elementary school.
Choss Chasin'
From Torrance, CA
Joined Aug 23, 2010
36 points
Dec 15, 2010
Beer, bolts, and babes;......does that help any? (Keep it simple, my friends...keep it simple....)...........Nice beautiful sunny day, sweetheart by your side, an 18 pack of cheap beer, and a piece of rock with a bunch of Petzel hangers winkin' at ya......c'mon.......you know you love it.......admit it.....(Somebody please put that anchor back on the top of Colorado Crack.......it takes FOREVER to get back to the beers now.......) toddgordon
From Joshua Tree, California
Joined Nov 26, 2006
9,929 points
Dec 15, 2010
toddgordon wrote:
Beer, bolts, and babes;......does that help any? (Keep it simple, my friends...keep it simple....)...........Nice beautiful sunny day, sweetheart by your side, an 18 pack of cheap beer, and a piece of rock with a bunch of Petzel hangers winkin' at ya......c'mon.......you know you love it.......admit it.....(Somebody please put that anchor back on the top of Colorado Crack.......it takes FOREVER to get back to the beers now.......)

You can't argue with that...
J.J
Joined Aug 23, 2008
185 points
Dec 16, 2010
JJ Brunner wrote:
You can't argue with that...

I've walked of CC crack with a quart of beer in my hand and didn't spill a drop. Can't do that on rap can you?

No PUSSIFICATION!!
Murf
Joined Jan 1, 2002
2,474 points
Dec 16, 2010
Murf wrote:
I've walked of CC crack with a quart of beer in my hand and didn't spill a drop. Can't do that on rap can you? No PUSSIFICATION!!

But if for some horrible reason you don't have beer in the first place, he's saying you'll want to get to it ASAP.
J.J
Joined Aug 23, 2008
185 points
Administrator
Dec 16, 2010
El Chorro
Muff wrote:
Ryan, I think you have a very good mindset in regards to this situation. I don't want this to be lengthy but here's how I view the history of climbing and modern day climbers in a nutshell: The original climbers were nothing short of fearless men and women who had the mental and physical strength of superhumans. These individuals were well aware of the dangers of climbing and in a lot of cases made their own climbing gear. They knew damn well what 5.7 trad felt like and if you have ever climbed places like Tahquitz you know that the open book is the stoutest 5.9 on the planet making some 5.10s and 5.11s look like child's play. Ok there's the past. Here is the present. Today we have a large community of climbers both seasoned and new to the game. These climbers are typically climbing hard sport as they were trained in the gym and have now made an awkward transition into climbing. They are like growing puppies or adolescent children who are not fully aware of their bodies. They have the power of a v10 boulderer or a 5.12 sport climber but do not have the mental game to keep it together above sketchy gear. I am a culprit of this as I am very early in my career but was fortunate enough to survive my early trad climbing days when I got myself in over my head. Its hard for new climbers to enter the arena and see people free solo something that is hard for them. When the media portrays ultra strong climbers who make it look easy, these new climbers want a piece of that pie. So to make it simple. Newer climbers (myself included) are not humble and are not super sensible of the dangers of climbing. Try to put yourself in their shoes. The right decision in my mind is NOT TO BOLT Double Cross and to be honest there really isn't any solution to this issue unless we change the fundamentals of climbing and our approach to it. INSTILL FEAR MY FRIENDs! It's the only way to get people to slow down and maybe consider learning things on a slower curve.


I think you worded that pretty well and we seem to agree on a lot of things. But it wasn't so long ago (I'm 27) that I was also a new climber and there are also 5.9's here(and .8's and .7's) that scare the shit out of good climbers. You'd think that learning in an old school area (like J Tree and many other areas in CA) would cause people to take things more seriously. It's not uncommon for climbers in NC to lead run out 5.10's after less than a year of climbing. Maybe it's because we learn to climb outside? Maybe it's because we don't have sport climbing here? Who knows... but I like it :)
Ryan Williams
From London (sort of)
Joined May 10, 2009
1,468 points
Administrator
Dec 16, 2010
El Chorro
Murf wrote:
In a lot of cases they were stoned teenagers, who like most teenagers were clueless.


Maybe so but they still did things that 99% of us won't do (myself included).

And I've just realized that there is a "Murf" AND a "Muff" in this convo... I'm three strong drinks in and I have to drive through an ice storm tomorrow to pick up my sister so I'm going to sleep!
Ryan Williams
From London (sort of)
Joined May 10, 2009
1,468 points
Dec 16, 2010
My kinda simian
Joe Lee wrote:
Double Cross, like its Eldo cousin Bastille Crack, are booby traps for the noob. They lure the naive climber with their 5.7 grade, laughable approach, and famous names. But they both demand skill at placing gear and jamming near the star to make them safe.


For posterity.
Ryan Kelly
From work.
Joined Oct 10, 2006
3,262 points
Dec 16, 2010
Russ
JDF News Alert:
Currently raining in Josh, but there is action on Double Cross so I am told.
Russ Walling
From www.FishProducts.com
Joined Oct 5, 2004
3,275 points
Dec 16, 2010
Choss Chasin' wrote:
Hey Bryan if your going to quote me at least keep it in context. I don't defend retrobolters nor do I retrobolt myself. What I said was that I hate seeing the aftermath of a bolt war. Holes everywhere and so on and so forth. What I was asking is that choppers think twice before they chop; the same as bolters should think twice before they bolt. P.S. This entire thread is out of control at this point. After skimming through it I feel like I'm back in elementary school.


Choppers don't have to think, just chop. Pussy retro-bolters need to back off and put down the drill.
Murf
Joined Jan 1, 2002
2,474 points
Dec 16, 2010
Easy stuff at Rifle
Seems like a lot of large egos hard at work here, something that has always baffled me about parts of the climbing community. Just because I can climb at a certain difficulty and comfort level, it doesn't mean that everyone climbing after me HAS to climb like me. Now having said that, I also know that there are plenty of climbers that climb harder and bolder than I do. That doesn't give them an excuse to impose their ego on me, ESPECIALLY ON OUR PUBLIC LANDS! Seems like a lot of people posting here have forgotten the key word: PUBLIC. When a first ascent party wants to make a route safer for the climber at that climbs' grade, what's the problem? Who says you have to clip bolts when they are there. The banter here is incredibly silly on this subject. I might understand the many complaints if this was a route on private property.... Tim Hadfield
From Steamboat Springs, Co
Joined Sep 27, 2009
831 points
Dec 16, 2010
My kinda simian
Nice job Tim, I was worried this thread was dying out. Your post should ensure this goes for another 4 or 5 pages at least. Ryan Kelly
From work.
Joined Oct 10, 2006
3,262 points


Follow replies to this topic? Notify me at the top of web site.
1

Email me.
Page 6 of 23.  <<First   <Prev   4  5  6  7  8   Next>   Last>>
Beyond the Guidebook:
The Definitive Climbing Resource
Inspiration & Motivation
to Fuel Your Run
Next Generation Mountain
Bike Trail Maps
Backcountry, Sidecountry
& Secret Stashes
Better Data. Better Tools.
Better Hikes!