By USBRIT Oct 21, 2012
| Dawn Wall. Been watchinga TV program where climbers were attempting to free climb Dawn Wall on El Cap. Maybe I am old fasioned but reducing a three thousand foot climb to sport pitches with draws already placed ahead of the attempt(regardless of difficulty ) seems not quite Kosher if you know what I mean ... What do you think ? |  FLAG |
By ClimberRunner From Redmond, WA Oct 21, 2012
| Their goal is to redpoint each pitch, in order, bottom to top in one ascent, and thereby free the route. It's widely accepted that having a biner or draw on a piece of fixed pro is: A. easier B. Fair game for freeclimbing/redpointing pitches. Hence they are putting draws on the fixed pro, and spending time on the hardest moves. They are also placing any non-fixed gear on lead attempts. And that's what makes sense for a possible FFA of any difficulty: to accomplish it in the most efficient way possible. (which in this case, may be the ONLY way possible, or it may still not be possible) Would it be more impressive for someone to send that route going ground-up? Definitely. Would it be more impressive for someone to send that route in bowling shoes? Definitely. Both would be amazing accomplishments, neither is going to be how such routes get freed. |  FLAG |
By Austin Baird From SLC, Utah Oct 21, 2012
| I think Tommy Caldwell has proven himself as more than just a pink-pointing sport climber. Watching someone free-climb that many pitches of 5.13 and 5.14 up El Cap is pretty inspiring, preplaced draws or not. |  FLAG |
By michaeltarne Oct 21, 2012
| I'll reserve my style judgements for when I can actually do the route in a better style than him. TC is as good at free climbing in the valley as anyone is, I don't see any problems. |  FLAG |
By John Wilder From Las Vegas, NV Oct 21, 2012
| USBRIT wrote: Dawn Wall. Been watchinga TV program where climbers were attempting to free climb Dawn Wall on El Cap. Maybe I am old fasioned but reducing a three thousand foot climb to sport pitches with draws already placed ahead of the attempt(regardless of difficulty ) seems not quite Kosher if you know what I mean ... What do you think ? I dont know if i'd call anything they're doing on El Cap a 'sport' pitch. Multiple 5.13 pitches protected by copperheads and marginal rp's seem to be the standard for that climb. They are being very careful to not place extra bolts on the aid line or otherwise decrease the challenge of the route for aid climbers. |  FLAG |
By USBRIT Oct 21, 2012
| If I remember when they freed Muir wall in 2001 photos showed pre place cams . Does this mean that second ascents have to rap the climb to preplace protection or do they aid it first? Does it mention somewhere on the decription of the free ascent about preplaced pro?. As you say good effort but..... |  FLAG |
By John Wilder From Las Vegas, NV Oct 22, 2012
| So far as I am aware, when Tommy and co. have gone on their redpoint attempts, they are placing gear on lead. If they fall, they lower back to belay and go again. I dont know if they pull the gear or not. |  FLAG |
By bearbreeder Oct 22, 2012
| gotta love it when someone who cant climb anyone near that level complain about the "ethics" of people who go out there and do it ... perhaps people can get on that wall and show mr Caldwell, Jorgeson and Siegrist how to REALLY climb ;) |  FLAG |
By Benjamin Chapman From CA Oct 22, 2012
| Bearbreeder......ethics are ethics regardless of your ability. Ground up, red point, yo-yo, trad or sport, it's the same standard for everyone. Elite climbers don't shat any more or less than the rest of us. What Tommy Caldwell and crew are doing is inspirational and impressive, but don't try to sell us that their ascent of the Dawn Wall should be judged by different standard because of their abilities. You may not like USBRIT's tone, but THERE ARE NO DOUBLE STANDARDS BASED ON ABILITY! Even armchair climbers have 1st Amendment rights and the right to complain, just like you, me and elite climbers. |  FLAG |
By camhead Oct 22, 2012
| USBRIT wrote: Dawn Wall. Been watchinga TV program where climbers were attempting to free climb Dawn Wall on El Cap. Maybe I am old fasioned but reducing a three thousand foot climb to sport pitches with draws already placed ahead of the attempt(regardless of difficulty ) seems not quite Kosher if you know what I mean ... What do you think ? yawn. |  FLAG |
By Jake Jones From The Eastern Flatlands Oct 22, 2012
| Yeah, all that super difficult 13+ climbing for multiple pitches, sometimes in super cold temps with the added difficulties of big wall logisitics and sustaining long arduous pushes is a complete joke. How dare these guys assault ethics like that. I may write my congressman and see if something can be done.
Benjamin Chapman wrote: Bearbreeder......ethics are ethics regardless of your ability. Ground up, red point, yo-yo, trad or sport, it's the same standard for everyone. Elite climbers don't shat any more or less than the rest of us. What Tommy Caldwell and crew are doing is inspirational and impressive, but don't try to sell us that their ascent of the Dawn Wall should be judged by different standard because of their abilities. You may not like USBRIT's tone, but THERE ARE NO DOUBLE STANDARDS BASED ON ABILITY! Even armchair climbers have 1st Amendment rights and the right to complain, just like you, me and elite climbers. I don't entirely agree with this. For conventional sports, sure. The accepted practice is being an "armchair quarterback" where you judge people on abilities you'll never have and bitch and whine and complain about plays that you could never pull off in your wildest fantasies. I think, or perhaps I trick myself into believing that climbers and climbing is different, or should be. I personally cannot climb "real" routes yet, if we're classifying by grade (real being the distinction of .12 and up). I wouldn't impose my "ethics" on someone unless their actions are extreme- especially when I'm not capable of the level of climbing they are. It goes a little beyond a perspective of ethics. These guys aren't up there with a Bosch and throwing up a bolt ladder. There seems to be some confusion when people say "sport" and "traditional". These two things don't mean simply "bolted" and "gear protected". Traditional routes are established from the ground up. They may have some bolts, or none. Sport routes or "pitches" as you put it, are not established ground up. That is the major difference. If you top rope a route, figure out stances and gear ahead of time, then place gear on lead when you have it wired, then you have essentially just climbed a sport route. And there's nothing wrong with that. Do what you want and have fun doing it. What I've just described however, is not what these gentleman are doing- at least that's not my understanding of it. Even so, if I see someone headpoint The Greatest Show on Earth, I'm certainly going to keep my mouth shut if they refer to what they just did as a "trad climb". Why? Because I can't do it, and I respect their ability and the time they put in to obtain that ability to do that route. And maybe, just maybe, if I'm not focused on whether or not they climbed it in the most spectacular style, I can learn something from them. But, there are some, who think the style and ethics in which a route or pitch is climbed is paramount. You're more than welcome to that opinion as well. I just prefer to live in the gray area where everything, skill, and ethics, is taken into account. This is just my opinion. |  FLAG |
By Nick Zmyewski From Newark, Delaware Oct 22, 2012
| Benjamin Chapman wrote: Bearbreeder......ethics are ethics regardless of your ability. Ground up, red point, yo-yo, trad or sport, it's the same standard for everyone. Elite climbers don't shat any more or less than the rest of us. What Tommy Caldwell and crew are doing is inspirational and impressive, but don't try to sell us that their ascent of the Dawn Wall should be judged by different standard because of their abilities. You may not like USBRIT's tone, but THERE ARE NO DOUBLE STANDARDS BASED ON ABILITY! Even armchair climbers have 1st Amendment rights and the right to complain, just like you, me and elite climbers. Because bearbreeder was questioning usbrit's 1st amendment right? |  FLAG |
By Nick Stayner From The Magic City Oct 22, 2012
| USBRIT wrote: Dawn Wall. Been watchinga TV program where climbers were attempting to free climb Dawn Wall on El Cap. Maybe I am old fasioned but reducing a three thousand foot climb to sport pitches with draws already placed ahead of the attempt(regardless of difficulty ) seems not quite Kosher if you know what I mean ... What do you think ? I think you should go out there and one-up Tommy on style! Good luck with that... then maybe your opinion could hold some water. |  FLAG |
By Scott O From Was NC, now Fresno Oct 22, 2012
| Benjamin Chapman wrote: Bearbreeder......ethics are ethics regardless of your ability. Ground up, red point, yo-yo, trad or sport, it's the same standard for everyone. Elite climbers don't shat any more or less than the rest of us. What Tommy Caldwell and crew are doing is inspirational and impressive, but don't try to sell us that their ascent of the Dawn Wall should be judged by different standard because of their abilities. You may not like USBRIT's tone, but THERE ARE NO DOUBLE STANDARDS BASED ON ABILITY! Even armchair climbers have 1st Amendment rights and the right to complain, just like you, me and elite climbers. Agreed, which is why I'm way more impressed by the guy who did it ground up on the first try! Wait... that's nobody? Tommy's ascent is incredibly impressive and a huge leap forward no matter how he does it. When someone from the next generation comes along and onsites it, that will be even more impressive, but we're nowhere near that level yet. Let's just applaud and encourage Tommy Caldwell for the huge leap forward he's trying to take. Bottom line: If you're open about the style you use and not altering the route, then who cares how you climb something? |  FLAG |
By Perin Blanchard Administrator From Orem, UT Oct 22, 2012
| I think I may give USBRIT's opinion a bit more weight than those of some of the rest of us. |  FLAG |
By J Q Oct 22, 2012
| Perin Blanchard wrote: I think I may give USBRIT's opinion a bit more weight than those of some of the rest of us. Seriously? Then let's see him show us what good style is instead of whining about it on the internet and starting a flame war. Actions always speak louder than words. And no, you can't just assume that because you have mastered one part of climbing your experience transfers to another. If you have never climbed a 5.14 you don't know what it means to climb 5.14. If you have only climbed 5.14 sport and go to the black your gonna die. Climbing ethics are worse than bad porn, they work in all different sorts of ways, everyone has a different preference, and climbing is just a very vague term to say you like to suffer on rock. He is basically saying that his way of suffering is the correct way and that is the very definition of egocentric behavior. The only real question is: How exactly do you prefer to suffer, and does your way of suffering really impede others ability to suffer how they want to? |  FLAG |
By Boissal From Small Lake, UT Oct 22, 2012
| Jonhy Q wrote: Then let's see him show us what good style is instead of whining about it on the internet and starting a flame war Anyone who has visited the Swell and climbed some of his routes there has a pair of stained underwear that makes a solid testimony to his understanding of good style... |  FLAG |
By Paul Hunnicutt From Boulder, CO Oct 22, 2012
| TC and company are climbing multiple 5.13 and 5.14 pitches on El Cap...seriously you really think this would have happened without sport climbing and alternate techniques from ground up and placing every draw. Be realistic. If someone comes along 50 years from now and onsights the Dawn Wall ground up, placing all gear, believe me they will have years of sport climbing, advanced equipment under their belts to have achieved such a level. TC has already climbed more hard trad on El Cap than anyone. Sorry ground up isn't going to get 5.14+ done on El Cap. Most, if not all the "easy" routes on El Cap are done. In fact it might not be even possible to bolt these pitches from hooks and marginal stances...not to mention test the moves and sequences. This climbing is so hard without inspection on rappel it might not be possible and you might be bolting into a wasteland, never to be climbed. Fine to celebrate ground up ascents, place all the gear ascents...just not the only way to climb. How many 5.14, 5.14+ ground up ascents are there? Any? |  FLAG |
By Jon Zucco From Denver, CO Oct 22, 2012
| Even Lynn Hill pre-hung draws on pre-placed pro in order to free climb the nose in one push. So what? Big deal. This in no way diminishes the value of her achievement: free climbing something that had previously only ever been aided. I want to furthermore this by sayin'; Lynn Hill is dreamy. She put the houdini corner thing (changing corners) at 5.13b, a pitch that was later conceded to be 5.14a/b. sigh... dreamy. |  FLAG |
By J Q Oct 22, 2012
| Boissal wrote: Anyone who has visited the Swell and climbed some of his routes there has a pair of stained underwear that makes a solid testimony to his understanding of good style... Or more likely, it has become your understanding of good style. I am not saying that his style of suffering isn't legit, he seems to love it, and good on him, I am just saying that . . . it is not the only style. Is this really a hard to concept to understand? It's not science. It's climbing. Just like porn, everyone has a different preference. You like to shit in your pants, but some people think that's not so cool. Fecal porn is a huge hit but it is not the only porn. Your possible love of fecal porn does not interfere with my ability to appreciate other porn, so why should I begin ranting about it on the internet? Oh, I see, to make you feel bad that your choices aren't my own. Like I said: ego-centric behavior. |  FLAG |
By Fall Guy Oct 22, 2012
| Jon Zucco wrote: Even Lynn Hill pre-hung draws on pre-placed pro in order to free climb the nose in one push. So what? Big deal. This in no way diminishes the value on her achievement: free climbing something that had previously only ever been aided. I want to furthermore this by sayin'; Lynn Hill is dreamy. She put the houdini corner thing at 5.13, a pitch that was later conceded to be 5.14a/b. sigh... dreamy. ratings for men and women are vastly different on cracks. If only I could hand jam in a .75 crack... |  FLAG |
By J Q Oct 22, 2012
| fair weather climber wrote: ratings for men and women are vastly different on cracks. If only I could hand jam in a .75 crack... Now that is a good troll! |  FLAG |
By Colonel Mustard From Reno, NV Oct 22, 2012
| Jonhy Q wrote: Now that is a good troll! You're right about that. Complaining hand size is the last defense of the true whiner. Right after height issues. Or weight. |  FLAG |
By Boissal From Small Lake, UT Oct 22, 2012
| Jonhy Q wrote: Something about dipping my dong in feces I can't recall stating my opinion about the Dawn Wall... All I said is that USBrit has good style. It doesn't mean I consider pre-clipped draws on 5.14+R on big walls as a pussification of the sport. I don't. I'm not sure what made you feel like you needed to ride your fecal-analogy horse to fight the windmills here. |  FLAG |
By Jon Zucco From Denver, CO Oct 22, 2012
| Boissal wrote: I'm not sure what made you feel like you needed to ride your fecal-analogy horse to fight the windmills here. this is superb imagery. |  FLAG |
By Kenan Oct 22, 2012
| Jonhy Q wrote: Or more likely, it has become your understanding of good style. I am not saying that his style of suffering isn't legit, he seems to love it, and good on him, I am just saying that . . . it is not the only style. Is this really a hard to concept to understand? It's not science. It's climbing. Just like porn, everyone has a different preference. You like to shit in your pants, but some people think that's not so cool. Fecal porn is a huge hit but it is not the only porn. Your possible love of fecal porn does not interfere with my ability to appreciate other porn, so why should I begin ranting about it on the internet? Oh, I see, to make you feel bad that your choices aren't my own. Like I said: ego-centric behavior. Oh, wow! HAHA this is priceless!!! I LOL'ed for many minutes |  FLAG |
|