|Type:||Trad, 1 pitch, 120'|
|Consensus:||YDS: 5.11d French: 7a Ewbanks: 24 UIAA: VIII ZA: 25 British: E5 6a [details]|
|FA:||FFA Peter Croft & Tami Knight|
|Submitted By:||David Trippett on Nov 28, 2007|
|Comments on Claim Jumper||Add Comment|
|Show which comments —
By Peter Spindloe
From: North Vancouver, BC
Aug 4, 2009
rating: 5.11d 7a 24 VIII 25 E5 6a
|Very fun climbing. While it had multiple cruxes, none felt as hard as Sentry Box.|
By Jonathan Guy
From: Bay Area, CA
Aug 26, 2012
rating: 5.11d 7a 24 VIII 25 E5 6a PG13
|a bomber #2 camalot can be had from the stance after the piton. super fun route with surprising cruxes.|
Aug 5, 2013
rating: 5.12a 7a+ 25 VIII+ 25 E5 6a
after doing sentry box this route was somewhat of a letdown. i have no idea how this could get 4 stars. unaesthetic, awkward, greasy climbing, sometimes on not great rock, make up about 2/3 of the route. the finger crack above is pretty good, but easy. there are at least a 100 better finger cracks in squamish.
i was kind of surprised that a lot of people call it 11d. i thought claim jumper was a bit harder than sentry box, but i might have been pretty tired at that point. also, i always find weird greasy open handed barndoor laybacking kind of tough.
By John Wilder
From: Las Vegas, NV
Aug 7, 2013
rating: 5.12a 7a+ 25 VIII+ 25 E5 6a PG13
a really fun route- suits the strong face climber. spicy, i thought- make sure to be solid and do not assume the pin will hold a fall. good gear where it matters.
I took a rack to a green camalot, doubled up on most of it and was pretty happy. no stoppers, although you could certainly place a few if you wanted to.