Center Dihedral 5.9
| 2,234 page views Good page?  |
| Type: | Trad, 4 pitches, 300 feet, Grade III |
| Consensus: | 5.10b [details] |
| FA: | Harvey Carter |
| Submitted By: | Stich on Aug 27, 2009 |
| |
BETA PHOTO: The route we took in red with the green line sugge...
Add Photo Printer View
Description After scaling the lower slabs, head for the main dihedral in the center of the West side of the pinnacle. Note a crack with a bolted chain anchor over to your left at the level of the start of the dihedral. There is also another crack with some old bolt hangers on the slab higher up on the left as well. Keep to the main dihedral. The only fixed gear on the route are pins left from the FA. The 5.9 finger crack is within the first 100 feet of the wall. Gear placements may end up making this section more difficult for the leader, but once removed much easier for the follower. Go up and to the right on a very narrow ramp with a crack in it and end on a wide ledge below a roof. A wide crack is on the left. If taken, this crack will strand you on a sub-peak and make it necessary to rap off of. This way will keep the climbing under 5.9 however. A harder 5.10c variation climbs up and around the small roof to just below the final summit pitch. This has yet to see a clean ascent from recent visitors, so the rating is speculative at best. Once at the large ledge with treees, climb up a wide crack far right with a keyhole that has a view to the other side and then vere left up a short slab section to sneak past the boulders that make the summit ridge. To descend the route, simply scramble North along the ridge line until it becomes obvious where you can move down and to the right (East). Some large, twisted trees are along the way. A small creek flows in this drainage and leads the way down to the hiking trail, but the water disappears underground at some point.
Location See the topo.
Protection Full set of cams with one set of nuts.
Pangborn's as viewed from the hiking trail.
| Looking down from pitch 2.
| Laura at the end of the second pitch ledge. A slin...
| The final summit headwall.
| Looking down from the final pitch.
| A view of the face from the descent trail. The Cen...
| BETA PHOTO: Second belay/start of 3rd pitch.
| BETA PHOTO: View of the top. I did it in 2 pitches to limit ro...
| BETA PHOTO: I didn't take coordinates, but this is my take on ...
| | | |
| Comments on Center Dihedral |
|
By Stich From: Colorado Springs, Colorado Aug 27, 2009
| This is an excellent just under a half day outing on good rock with a mountaineering feel to it. The first two pitches comprise the best climbing. It can turn into a grad IV if you have trouble route finding, however, but not too bad. |
By loc From: colorado springs co Sep 3, 2009
| I need better topo. Do you have the GPS for it? |
By Lauren D. Hollingsworth From: Colorado Springs, CO Sep 12, 2009
| Loc, it's accessed from the crags trail on the west side of Pike's Peak. It's on the way to Cripple Creek, just after the east side of Mueller State Park, left side of HWY 67. I believe there is a brown sign pointing the turn off the highway. |
By phil wortmann From: Colorado Springs, Co. Jan 20, 2010
| Great topo, Stich! especially for as confusing as this route can be. The crack to the left is a good 5.9 alternative as well. |
By Darren Mabe From: Flagstaff, AZ Jan 20, 2010
| The alternate pitch 2 is one of the best granite 5.9 pitches I have done. |
By Tim Banfield From: Calgary, Alberta Aug 25, 2010 rating: 5.9
| Thanks for posting this climb, Stich. I thought it was a bit sand bagged at 5.8. There seemed to be a couple sections of 5.9 to me. We tried to turn the roof but couldn't do it. We ended up going up the wide crack to the left, then rapping down about 30ft to continue the climb. We used a 70m rope and made it to the ledge under the roof in one pitch. |
By jmath From: durango, CO Mar 10, 2011
| Absolutely agree classic Pike's Peak rock. There are some excellent one pitch climbs climber's right of the slabs on the pinnacle; I have done multiple variations up the center and they vary from 5.8 to 5.9 never harder than that and all excellent. To note, across the valley are some other excellent one pitch classics as well, God's Rock or Crag can't remember the name. There is no topo that I'm aware of, but they are on excellent rock and have some great adventure climbing. |
By Keith B. Ives From: Colorado Springs, CO Jun 11, 2012 rating: 5.10+
| A couple of things from my recent trip: This is not 5.8 - no argument about it. I am not an amazing climber, but I can't remember falling on anything less than 5.10 is the last few years. The cracks require some crack skill to make them 5.8/5.9ish. However, when you get to the roof...it will take some more advanced moves. The pro is smaller, and the crack on the top of roof has some suspect smaller rocks in it. It held for me, but I don't know if that will always be the case. You will want small cams here. I normally climb with a lot of passive gear and use cams for the bigger stuff. I didn't take any C3s & regretted it at the roof. I ended up aiding the roof. The moves through the roof were finger-size but fine. However, I for the life of me could not pull the move out of it. I was leading the whole thing & was prob a bit tired, but I could not pull myself out of the roof on the small finger crack above it (#6 BD nut). Further, if you fall - there is a really nice, pointy, detached flake to land on.... The hike off is easy and fairly straightforward. Great description for this section. For the approach, I didn't really find a trail, I just cut over once I was close the the tower & walked straight uphill. I am sure there is a better way, but nobody has posted it yet. I ended up doing it in 5 pitches. Mainly because of rope drag. This is a great climb & a hidden gem for those of us in COS. I plan on doing it again soon with a more experienced partner to see if it feels any easier when I know I have another solid leader with me. The main point is, do not be fooled by the 5.8 rating or 5.9 consensus. There are some tricky parts to this climb. Nothing a pair of 5.10 climbers can't knock out (even if you have to aid the roof). However, I think the 5.8, half day climb description is a bit irresponsible. |
By Keith B. Ives From: Colorado Springs, CO Jun 11, 2012 rating: 5.10+
| Here is a map I made on Google. Take it for what it is worth. My Google Map. |
By Casey Graham From: Colorado Springs, CO Jun 22, 2012 rating: 5.10+
| Did this route with Keith (above) today and was pleasantly surprised at the quality and length of the route. A nice moderate - exciting 4 pitch climb that close to home is a great resource and the surrounding area looks great too. We scrambled up the due west side to get to the first belay station on 5.4-5.5 rock for about 150ft which I am sure can be navigated another way, but we didn't see any obvious path. If you are comfortable with 5.5 granite slab, don't bother with roping up as it is way quicker and not really exposed to get to the belay ledge. I agree with earlier comments: The first two pitches are definitely the most cruiser with great crack moves and good pro. We got to the base of the roof on a fantastic ledge in two pitches, one long and a second short one because we had a 60m rope. You can definitely link the two together with a 70m, but you will have some intense rope drag, not from placements, but from the nature of the route and rock you go over. I agree with Keith, the roof is definitely sandbagged at 5.8. That is easily a 10c-11 move out from under the roof with a serious potential for injury if you fall. I'd also suggest a helmet for this move as a leader and a follower as the footing is slick and a fall by either end up with your head swinging into the roof edge. The crack that circumnavigates the roof on the left is certainly easier, maybe 5.8 big hands and fists, but it is my understanding this is not the actual route. Either way, it looked great and for those who don't want to deal with the roof moves, its a great alternate route. The top was traversy but easy and protection was great. All in all a fantastic climb, one I will definitely revisit, and we were car to car in just under 6 hours. Bring a #4 and #3 for sure and some C3s #00-2 for the roof. |
By Phil Raymond From: colorado springs Jun 24, 2012 rating: 5.10+
| I found this climb to be top notch for the Springs area! Fun and varied climbing with spectacular views. However, I have climbed this route twice now, and I am glad to see the consensus going up. I found the move out of the roof to be very, very tricky. Even after I trained and came back at it in better shape, I still had to pull on a piece to get it. There is certainly potential for a dangerous fall onto the flake below the roof, but as long as your pro holds (unlike mine), you shouldn't hit it (like me). The roof move I say goes at 5.10+, but the rest of the route is more like 5.8/5.9 unless you are not used to crack climbing, in which case it will seem harder. The trickiest part is not placing pro where you want your hands to be. Unless you are a fast hiker and very efficient multi-pitcher, I would budget a full day for this one, especially if you want to avoid any chance of hitting the afternoon storms that frequent this elevation. |
By Keith B. Ives From: Colorado Springs, CO Jun 25, 2012 rating: 5.10+
| Phil, this weekend was my second time too. I completely agree with you. I have worked my ass off on that roof twice now. Getting out from underneath it with the one worthless finger hold is impossible(at my skill level). I have pulled on gear both times now. I have also had my gear come out both times now. I have also decked both times now.... I emailed a moderator to encourage an update on beta for this climb. Listing it as a 5.8 half-day event is irresponsible. Casey & I went door to door from the higher parking lot (the pay one) in six hours. We were trying to hurry though as I had an appointment. This is a fantastic climb, but budget all day so you can be confident & not have to worry storms or the sun setting.... |
By Legs Magillicutty From: Littleton Jul 31, 2012
| One of my favorite CO Springs area climbs. The rock was bomber and every pitch had some burl to it. Thanks, Tim! |
|