Home - Destinations - iPhone/Android - Gyms - Partners - Forum - Photos - Deals - What's New
 ADVANCED
Cam or Big Bro?



View Latest Posts in This Forum or All Forums


Page 1 of 1.  
 
By Tom Lausch
From Stoughton, WI
Sep 24, 2012
Orgasm Direct

Am I better off getting a #3 big bro or a the respective camalots. I climb mostly at the slippery devils lake. I am on the fence and just looking for opinions.


FLAG
By S Denny
From Carbondale, CO
Sep 24, 2012

cams certainly inspire more confidence...


FLAG
By JCM
From Golden, CO
Sep 24, 2012

For the largest sizes, where the Big Bros are the only option, the choice is easy.

In the middling-large sizes, where you are choosing between a big bro and a #5 or a #6 Camalot, I would definately start witht the big Camalot. These are a lot more versatile (flares, etc), easier to place, and, most importantly, you can scoot them for the moving-ow-toprope strategy.

If you become one of those sick-puppy OW freaks, you can fill in the rack with big bros later, but start with the big cam(s).


FLAG
By ParkerKempf
From atlanta, GA
Sep 24, 2012
sweet belay on El Cap Spire, Salathe Wall El Capitan

+1 to jon, have you ever tried placing a big bro? go all the way to at least #6 camelots if not the big dudes


FLAG
By mrbiscoop
Sep 26, 2012

Bolts are the way to go. Fuck gear.


FLAG
By thomas.w
From Fort Collins
Sep 26, 2012

Another option to big bros if you can afford it and are getting into the really big stuff.

www.valleygiant.com/no9cam.html


FLAG
By randy88fj62
Sep 27, 2012
Thunderbolt Peak in the Palisades

Cams are faster to place and can be walked along side you with very little effort. Big Bros cannot do that. I would definitely start with cams and then add big bros to your rack in the future if you really want them.


FLAG
By Andy Hansen
From Longmont, Colorado
Sep 27, 2012
Scarlet Begonias, 5.11a, Zion NP. Photo by the illustrious swillbilly himself Matt Kuehl.

If you're climbing at the Lake there are only a handful of routes that require the use of big cams or Bros. I really don't think buying big cams for specifically climbing at the Lake is really necessary. But honestly in my opinion you're better off using big Camalots if large pro is ever really necessary.


FLAG
By Woodchuck ATC
Sep 27, 2012
bouldering at RRG

I think the bigger the cam, the more likely it will slip on that smooth sided DL quartzite. A well fit Big Bro' might do the job better considering the rock will NOT crush or erode at all from the pro against it. They're bomber. Not sure why you need that big a size, but check out someone selling some 'bros here at MP.
www.mountainproject.com/v/fs---bigbros-1-and-2/107798416


FLAG
By Doug Hemken
Administrator
Sep 27, 2012
photo by Burt Lindquist

Tom, so a #3 big bro is about the same size as a #6 c4, maybe a little larger?

You have to be pretty broad-minded to even find stuff that size at the Lake ...!

The C4 will be easier to place well and easier to place quickly. Definitely heavier and bulkier to pack around.


FLAG
By NickinCO
From Westminster, CO
Sep 27, 2012
me

+1, can't think of anything off the top of my head that absolutely requires gear that big at the lake. I'd rather have the cam though. For me big bros are harder to climb past and kicking them out scares the crap out of me. Big cams you can also walk.


Not that I think any of that is necessary at the lake but for your travels...


FLAG
By Andy Hansen
From Longmont, Colorado
Sep 27, 2012
Scarlet Begonias, 5.11a, Zion NP. Photo by the illustrious swillbilly himself Matt Kuehl.

What's up with people thinking cams will slide on the DL quartzite? I would like to hear a first-hand account of this ever happening. To me this just seems like a myth.


FLAG
By kennoyce
From Clearfield, UT
Sep 27, 2012
Climbing at the Gallery in Red Rocks

Andy Hansen wrote:
What's up with people thinking cams will slide on the DL quartzite? I would like to hear a first-hand account of this ever happening. To me this just seems like a myth.



Never climbed at DL, so no first-hand experience there, but I have seen perfectly placed cams slide out of quartzite in another area (rock canyon, UT). This is certainly a possibility if the coefficient of friction between the lobes and the rock is too low, and a cam with a bigger camming angle like BDs certainly doesn't help the situation.


FLAG
By ccerling
From Platteville, WI
Sep 27, 2012
me

Andy Hansen wrote:
What's up with people thinking cams will slide on the DL quartzite? I would like to hear a first-hand account of this ever happening. To me this just seems like a myth.


I've never seen one slide out but the bigger sizes of C4s will walk real easily at DL if you're not careful about placement and rope drag.


FLAG
By Cactus Moonshine
Sep 28, 2012
Carnegiea gigantea

Can't bump a Big Bro.


FLAG
By Andy Hansen
From Longmont, Colorado
Sep 28, 2012
Scarlet Begonias, 5.11a, Zion NP. Photo by the illustrious swillbilly himself Matt Kuehl.

ccerling wrote:
I've never seen one slide out but the bigger sizes of C4s will walk real easily at DL if you're not careful about placement and rope drag.


I think this is true in most cases regardless of rock friction or cam size. But, regarding friction coefficient... (Mu?) I guess I'd really need to see some empirical evidence or data. This isn't something I geek out about usually but I've heard this so many times coming from people well versed and not so well versed about placing cams at the Lake. Personally I think it's sort of bogus as it's never happened to me on any route at the Lake and I almost exclusively was leading there.


FLAG
By Alex McIntyre
From Tucson, AZ
Sep 28, 2012

Andy Hansen wrote:
I think this is true in most cases regardless of rock friction or cam size. But, regarding friction coefficient... (Mu?) I guess I'd really need to see some empirical evidence or data. This isn't something I geek out about usually but I've heard this so many times coming from people well versed and not so well versed about placing cams at the Lake. Personally I think it's sort of bogus as it's never happened to me on any route at the Lake and I almost exclusively was leading there.

As I recall there was a Climbing mag article at some point with first-hand info about cams slipping at Devil's Lake. I could be completely misremembering though, so I'd recommend checking it out yourself. Left most of my climbing mags at home instead of bringing them to my dorm.


FLAG
By Doug Hemken
Administrator
Sep 28, 2012
photo by Burt Lindquist

Andy, I think sometimes people confuse the problems of Baraboo quartzite with the problems of shallowly placed gear.

Personally, I've blown more shallowly placed small nuts than anything else in this rock. Maybe that's just me.


FLAG
By Greg D
From Here
Sep 28, 2012
Out of the blue.  Photo by Mike W. <br />

Big bro is a more reliable placement. Plus you can't do that complex top rope bs. You gotta climb.


FLAG
By JMo
From Flagstaff, AZ
Sep 28, 2012
mayflower

Both. You still saved 1000's over being a golfer. Or boater.


FLAG
By Caprinae monkey
May 2, 2013
the square-shaped feet get some relief

JCM wrote:
These are a lot more versatile (flares, etc), easier to place, and, most importantly, you can scoot them for the moving-ow-toprope strategy.


LOL love that "moving-ow-toprope strategy." Thanks for the advice (another old thread I revived, but easier than asking the same already-answered questions)

Are you ever concerned about falling before placing the first piece, and having a giant #6 cam spike you in the back?


FLAG

Page 1 of 1.