Home - Destinations - People - Partners - Forum - Photos - What's New
 ADVANCED
Open Book Area
Show routes:
Select route...
Green Arch 
Mechanic's Route 
Open Book 
Zig Zag 

Open Book 

5.9

   

FA: John Mendenhall and Harry Sutherland, September 1947 FFA: Royal Robbins and Don Wilson, 1952
Type: Trad
Consensus: 5.9 [details]
Length: 3 pitches, 490 feet
Views: 2,597 page views

Submitted By: Luke Stefurak on Feb 3, 2006


Add Photo  Add Comment 

You and this route  |  Other Opinions (33)
Your todo list:
Your stars:
Your rating: -none- [change]
Your ticklist: [add new tick]
 Printer Friendly View

Charlie, rounding the roof and arriving at the sec...


Description 

This 3 pitch beauty ascends a very obvious dihedral. The first few moves off the deck are exciting and lead to an enjoyable first belay in a little nook.

The second pitch contains the business. You layback a 4" crack for 60+ feet to gain a belay either inside a little cave or right after depending on what gear you have left. The last pich starts with some fun slab moves and exits to easier ground. Top out and hike to the top of Taquitz on easy 3rd class. Then you can hike out.


Protection 

Standard rack with a doubles in the 3" - 4" range. The crack gets too wide for a # 4 camalot but you can easily run it a bit to a placement higher up.



Add Photo Photos of Open Book
Reconciling gear at the top of the popular Open Book (5.9) ©

Reconciling gear at the top of the popular Open Bo...

Todd Smith

Todd Smith

The grand Open Book (5.9) dihedral ©

The grand Open Book (5.9) dihedral ©

Open book is the right facing dihedral seen to the right of the main arete.

Open book is the right facing dihedral seen to the...

The first pitch of Open Book. (you can also see the roof near the top of the second pitch, but most of that pitch can't be seen).

The first pitch of Open Book. (you can also see th...

Charlie, placing gear on the second pitch of Open Book.<br />

Charlie, placing gear on the second pitch of Open ...

The start of Open Book.

The start of Open Book.

Open Book.

Open Book.


Add Comment Comments on Open Book
Show which comments
Comments displayed oldest to newestSkip Ahead to the Most Recent Dated Sep 2, 2008
By Dpurf
From: Superior
Feb 9, 2006
rating: 5.9

FA - Royal Robins. The first 5.9 in the country, it a classic and must do. For the 2nd pitch there is a number of ways to get through it. The layback options, less secure and harder to place gear, not the options I would take. The next option is to stem it in the wide section then finish with your crack climbing skills. Or just grovel up the offwidth, it secure and is very short.

By Chris Owen
Administrator
From: La Crescenta, CA
Mar 12, 2006

I always thought that a move about halfway up P1 was the crux, a steep little sequence.

By Joe Lee
From: Nogales, Arizona
Sep 18, 2006

Excellent route. Pitch one has two cruxes. I would have the stronger partner lead this pitch. The moves on the steep offwidth at the top of pitch one may be the crux. The start is tenuous. Take small and big pro. On pitch two, I didn't feel pressed to do much if any liebacking or stemming. There are bomber cupped hand and fist jams with one or two easy offwidth moves. Nothing bigger than the old #4 pink Camalot is necessary. You need red and yellow camalots for the anchor on pitch two. Does anyone know if you can rappel from the top anchor with two ropes?

By veedublvr
From: ?, Ca
Nov 22, 2006
rating: 5.10a/b

I personally think that this route was harder than 5.9. Also do not climb this route unless you have big cams (think Size 4 BD)and at least 3-5 of them. This is based on Beta from other climbers since I did not get past the first pitch because of other climbers warning us to bail since we had 1 #3 BD cam. The rap off the first pitch was sketchy as well. The rap rings were hanging off a chock stone from webbing that has seen better days. It was a good route though, just come prepared and you will have fun.

By Murf
Nov 22, 2006

veedublr - you give it 3 stars and a rating of 5.9 when you didn't even do the crux pitch. You rate it 5.9 but you don't think it's 5.9?

You are lucky you bailed, if you need 3-5 cams in the #4 BD range for this route, you shouldn't attempt to climb it.

By Adam Stackhouse
Administrator
From: Escondido, Ca
Dec 19, 2006
rating: 5.9

From a historical gear perspective, I went out and specifically bought one whopping 3.5 WC Friend. Kind of hysterical, in that I placed early during the second pitch, retrieved it and placed a bit further up, and then gave up on placing any more gear until the belay. With a total arm-bar near the top of this "run-out" pitch, I felt secure enough, especially considering the options. As recommended, two #4 Camalots would be perfect for this climb.

By Tim McCabe
Jan 2, 2007
rating: 5.9 PG13

The standard 5.9 that all other 5.9's are based on. The first pitch is a little hard to protect after that the gear is great. Standard rack plus one #4 BD Cam.

By Chris Owen
Administrator
From: La Crescenta, CA
Sep 14, 2007

As the datum 5.9 it can't be anything but 5.9 ;-)

Been a long time since I've done this but I didn't have a big friend or the BD copy.

By Scotty Nelson
From: San Diego
Jun 19, 2008

This climb is the dictionary definition of 5.9!

By Brian Hench
From: Laguna Beach
Jul 28, 2008
rating: 5.9+

The notion that you need a bunch of #4 Camalots and larger to do this route is complete nonsense.

My rack consisted of a set of Clogs to #4 (same as friends) plus Green and Red Camalots, 2 Yellow Camalots, and one Blue Camalot. The only piece I wish I had more of was the Yellow.

Many of the places that are wide have small cracks nearby. Sometimes you can get a smaller placement by going deeper. The places that only take really large gear are easy and can be run out.

This route was very difficult for me, so you can't say I was running it out because it was easy.

By Adam Stackhouse
Administrator
From: Escondido, Ca
Jul 28, 2008
rating: 5.9

Brian, gear recommendations are just that. Calling someone else's "complete nonsense" seems benighted at best. You did the route using what you thought was safe, and thats ok. But moreover, you said you employed the #4 Friend equivalent, which interestingly is a only touch smaller than a #4 Camalot.

By Ryan Kelly
From: the Gym
Sep 2, 2008
rating: 5.9

I think this may be 5.11- now.