|Photos:||Recent | Best | Popular|
|Location:||34.0045, -106.989 View Map Incorrect?|
|Administrators:||Aaron Hobson, Jason Halladay, Anthony Stout, LeeAB, Marta Reece, Kristine Hoffman (sitewide)|
|Submitted By:||Bob Broilo on Jan 27, 2006|
|ISO housing in Tucson, apologies for the non-climbing content||paul winkler||2 hours ago|
|re: Best Guidebook for New Mexico -- Near Santa Fe||Ian Donnelly||2 hours ago|
|re: AZ Visit from Germany||MacM||4 hours ago|
|re: Looking for partners||Blair Ryan||17 hours ago|
|re: Guidebook reccomendations for 4 corners area||Owen Summerscales||1 day ago|
|re: Prescott Guide||Nate Sydnor||3 days ago|
|Prescott Climbers Coalition meeting (Feb 16th @6pm)||Chris.Schenhoffer||3 days ago|
|re: Prescott Climbers Coalition meeting (Jan 7th @7pm)||Chris.Schenhoffer||3 days ago|
|Comments on The Box climbing areas||Add Comment|
|Show which comments —
Apr 8, 2008
|A lot of these routes were put up quite a while back...many of them are listed in my 1993 guidebook. I think they were put up before sport development really turned into an art. And it shows. Non-existent anchors, poorly placed anchors, too many shared anchors, too many unprotected bouldery starts, too many ill-considered bolt placements. It kind of takes the gloss off what SHOULD be a really fun area. The rock is great, the movement is good, but the route development is...not so good. I've never considered retro-bolting to be a topic even worthy of discussion, but this area has made me wonder. I think if I had just discovered this area and were doing the development, I could make it much better. It's not a big deal but I just thought I'd lob it out there. During the 3 days I was at Box I never saw any other climbers. I've never had that happen at Datil (which is not very far away). Is the quality of development part of the reason ?|
From: Albuquerque, NM
Sep 18, 2008
Yes, I think that the way this area was developed is one of the reasons why this area sees so little traffic. While there are many good / great routes here, there are also many that are missing anchors, need supplemental gear, or were just bolted poorly (Spook Canyon for instance). One example is Hurt Me Not, this climb never saw any traffic prior to it's retrobolting, now their is commonly chalk on it. While I was disappointed at the additional bolts as it takes away from the FA and the few subsequent ascents, I never led it until the extra bolts were added, and it is a single pitch route in a mostly sport climbing area.
Another reason for lack of traffic is that this area needs a good guidebook. The 1993 guidebook is far better and more accurate than the error ridden new Falcon guide, where many routes in the guide either don't exist, are in the wrong location, or aren't mentioned.
From: ABQ, NM
Mar 16, 2009
It also really depends on the time of year that you visit Socorro. If Datil is climable in most peoples opinions, yes most will head to the Tower, but if you visit in the middle of winter on a weekend I would be absolutely shocked if you did not see others out unless you were purposely trying to avoid other by avoiding the sun. One of Socorros most redeeming qualities is that when everything else is too cold to climb routes Socorro is still generally pleasent.
In addition, a handful of routes are getting "fixed" from time to time, and yes the Falcon guide is terrible, incomplete and inacurrate but is the only guide currently availible. It probably has fewer than half the routes and none of the bouldering which is quite good in places.