Route Guide - iPhone / Android - Partners - Forum - Photos - Deals - What's New
Login with Facebook
 ADVANCED
Anchors
View Latest Posts in This Forum or All Forums
   Page 1 of 2.  1  2   Next>   Last>>
Follow replies to this topic? Notify me at the top of web site.
1

Email me.
 
By Matt TeNgaio
Apr 23, 2009

anyone familiar with this style of anchor?

climbinggearinc.com/chain-anchors-p-493.html

I'm looking at alternatives for sport routes.


FLAG
By Evan1984
Apr 23, 2009

Yes, I've seen them and I like them. Someone at the crag refered to them as "euro" anchors, but I don't know if thats the real name.

Anyway, they are supposed to be drilled and installed in vertical orientation with the rap ring on the bottom bolt, which appears opposite the way it is shown in that picture. That way, if either bolt goes while you're rapping on it, the other won't get shock loaded. The other advantage to this setup is that if you clip the bottom bolt hanger or the rap ring, it is redundant because the load is equalized between the two bolts; I still build an anchor if I'm doing naything other than rapping on this setup.

The downside is that drilling has to be fairly precise to get proper equalization and you obviously have to have a good section of rock in a vertical orientation, which is not always the case. I have no personal experience with this, so I can't speak to how big of a downside this is.

evan


FLAG
By John Hegyes
From Las Vegas, NV
Apr 23, 2009
South of Windy Peak

Evan1984 wrote:
Anyway, they are supposed to be drilled and installed in vertical orientation with the rap ring on the bottom bolt, which appears opposite the way it is shown in that picture.


Yes, the picture is funny because it shows the ring in the wrong place.
Faders chain anchor
Faders chain anchor

I like this style of anchor for the zero-extension principle. It does feel weird threading the rope through only one ring which lacks redundancy, but at least it's a huge burly one.

I would hope that people are only rapping through the ring and not top-roping or lowering through.


FLAG
By Ron Olsen
From Boulder, CO
Apr 23, 2009
In the cow pasture below the Tre Cime de Lavaredo, after climbing Spitagoras, a 12-pitch 10a route. <br /> <br />Photo by <a href='/u/bruce-hildenbrand//11057'>Bruce Hildenbrand</a>

For one-pitch sport routes, I use MussyHooks:



Quick and convenient to clip and lower. Toprope through your own gear, but the last person down doesn't have to untie from the rope to thread it through rings. Safer for a less-experienced person to clean the anchor. Thick steel will last a long time, even with direct toprope abuse. Tested to 8,000 lbs.

The original MussyHooks are available from Fish Products.



$5.00 for the hook and $2.75 for the quick link. You can buy the hanger, quick link, and hook for $9.25 from Fish.

You can also buy winch hooks for $4.77 at Home Depot; these are being used for anchor replacement at Golden Cliffs in Colorado -- see Photo. However, I feel MussyHooks are superior (bigger gate opening, better shape) to the Home Depot winch hooks.

A winch hook which looks very much like the MussyHook is currently on sale from Amazon.com or Grady's Hardware for $2.10 each (regular price is $5.15), but I haven't bought one to make a direct comparison:


FLAG
By Daryl Allan
From Sierra Vista, AZ
Apr 23, 2009
Me and my Fetish I guess.. ;)

Matt, a note on installing these contraptions.. The best thing is to hold it by the hangers in the manner that they are oriented against the rock as if they were being mounted. Move the entire rig around until both hangers can be mounted flat while maintaining the optimal distance between them. The 'optimal distance' idea being that the ring hangs on the bottom hanger and the bottom chain link as equally as possible. Keep in mind you have a little give (if absolutely necessary) on placing them just slightly off perfectly vertical in respect to one another.. but not much at all. An inch or two at most, imo.

It's tricky but what i do is get the rig really close to where you want it, let go of the top (or bottom - it's up to you) hanger letting it fall, then put the drill through the other hanger bolt hole and give it a whack (or a quick .5 second trigger burst) to mark the hole. Mount the first hanger then do the next one in the same fashion after. When you're marking the 2nd bolt, that's where you are looking for two things; flat hanger placement as possible and equal load on the ring. You probably won't get it perfect but the closer you get it, the more impressed people that have a clue what they're looking at will be. =)

I go through all that mainly bc i'm a little obsessive about making sure the hangers are as flat as possible (don't rock at all) before mounting them.

And a note on that picture above. That's a horrible shot and, obviously, not how it should be mounted. Once you get one, it won't take long to play with it and figure out how it should go. There's only one sensible way to orient it so it works.


FLAG
By John Hegyes
From Las Vegas, NV
Apr 23, 2009
South of Windy Peak

Ron Olsen wrote:
A winch hook which looks very much like the MussyHook is currently on sale from Amazon.com but I haven't bought one to make a direct comparison:

Ron, I'd stick with climbing gear from a more reputable company. Two things on the winch hook packaging that look pretty bad: "Made in Taiwan" and "Not for overhead use".


FLAG
By Ron Olsen
From Boulder, CO
Apr 23, 2009
In the cow pasture below the Tre Cime de Lavaredo, after climbing Spitagoras, a 12-pitch 10a route. <br /> <br />Photo by <a href='/u/bruce-hildenbrand//11057'>Bruce Hildenbrand</a>

John Hegyes wrote:
Ron, I'd stick with climbing gear from a more reputable company. Two things on the winch hook packaging that look pretty bad: "Made in Taiwan" and "Not for overhead use".

The Seachoice 36981 winch hook has a strength rating of 7,000 lbs. The product spec says "Not recommended for overhead lifting." I don't think even a 300 lb. climber lowering off one of these will be in any danger of breaking it.

...and the latest batch of MussyHooks I just got from Fish have a big "China" marking on them.


FLAG
By John Hegyes
From Las Vegas, NV
Apr 23, 2009
South of Windy Peak

Ron Olsen wrote:
The Seachoice 36981 winch hook has a breaking strength of 7,000 lbs. I don't think even a 300 lb. climber lowering off one of these will be in any danger of breaking it. ...and the latest batch of MussyHooks I just got from Fish have a big "China" marking on them.

Call them and ask what design factor they use in determining the breaking strength. Ask what testing method they use. Are they UIAA certified? NFPA? ANSI? CE? Probably not. When one breaks, try finding a company to sue.


FLAG
By Ron Olsen
From Boulder, CO
Apr 23, 2009
In the cow pasture below the Tre Cime de Lavaredo, after climbing Spitagoras, a 12-pitch 10a route. <br /> <br />Photo by <a href='/u/bruce-hildenbrand//11057'>Bruce Hildenbrand</a>

John Hegyes wrote:
Call them and ask what design factor they use in determining the breaking strength. Ask what testing method they use. Are they UIAA certified? NFPA? ANSI? CE? Probably not. When one breaks, try finding a company to sue.

Seachoice is a reputable marine products company that stands behind the products they sell: Seachoice warranty. Still, it would be great to have Fish test one of these hooks to see how its breaking strength compares to a MussyHook.


FLAG
By John Hegyes
From Las Vegas, NV
Apr 23, 2009
South of Windy Peak

Sorry Ron, when it comes to sailing hardware I don't think Seachoice is in quite the same league as Wichard or Harken. Or if you're just looking for a plain old made in America hook I'd buy one from Crosby or Chicago Hardware.

"Not for overhead lifting" is code for
"we don't exercise strict quality control or product testing" and
"our manufacturing processes are not consistent" and
"we have no traceability of our raw materials or our finished products" and
"we don't recommend this product for life safety applications".

The problem with cheap hardware store grade hooks, chain, quicklinks, etc., is that the products they most commonly offer are the cheapest available which translates to zero quality assurance. And when it comes to safety critical uses, the lowest bidder is not often the best bet.


FLAG
By Ron Olsen
From Boulder, CO
Apr 23, 2009
In the cow pasture below the Tre Cime de Lavaredo, after climbing Spitagoras, a 12-pitch 10a route. <br /> <br />Photo by <a href='/u/bruce-hildenbrand//11057'>Bruce Hildenbrand</a>

So John, you think the made-in-China MussyHooks are manufactured to stricter quality-control standards than the Seachoice hooks? The list price of the Seachoice hooks ($5.15) is more than the price of MussyHooks ($5.00); I just happened to find a place that has them on sale.

I think you're making a big deal out of something that's not really a safety issue in the context of loads experienced while lowering off of rock climbs. A hook with a 7,000 lb. strength rating isn't going to fail when lowering a climber weighing 250 lbs. or less. And there's redundancy of having two hooks, not just one. Climbers have been lowering off of puny cold-shut anchors for years -- these winch hooks are far beefier and more durable than that.

Oh, and tell Ken Trout, longtime Colorado route developer, that he shouldn't be using those Home Depot hooks for his anchor-replacement work. They're smaller and cheaper ($4.77) than the Seachoice hooks.

By the way, I'm not using the Seachoice hooks -- I was just suggesting them as a possible alternative to MussyHooks. And I have no idea of the quality control standards of MussyHooks, other than Russ's comment on his website "Tested to 8,000 lbs." But the latest batch now has "China" stamped on it, whereas previous batches did not. Same manufacturer? Same process? Has Russ tested these new hooks? Are they UIAA certified? NFPA? ANSI? CE? My guess is that they are not. I'm trusting Russ they are of adequate strength and quality for use as lowering anchors on rock climbs.


FLAG
By Derek W
Apr 24, 2009
First summit of First Flatiron

The reason I'd stay away from a hook designed for winching is they often have sharp edges. They are made in a mold and you get that ridge where the 2 halves come together. They are also often coated in some metal dip (I'm not sure what it is) that begins to peel off and possibly get into your rope. Basically, more than strength and safety ratings for a reputable hook would be what it could do to your rope. ?? IMHO


FLAG
By John Hegyes
From Las Vegas, NV
Apr 24, 2009
South of Windy Peak

Ron Olsen wrote:
So John, you think the made-in-China MussyHooks are manufactured to stricter quality-control standards than the Seachoice hooks?
Actually, I didn't say anything of the kind. I never mentioned Mussy Hooks. I haven't seen any specifications on them, but if they are "made in China", I'd say I'd be pretty suspicious of them.

My point is anybody can forge a hook and stamp a rating. A legitimate company however has invested a lot of money in testing and certification that the cheap knock off companies bypass. That's the difference between a good hook and a cheap one.


FLAG
By Ron Olsen
From Boulder, CO
Apr 24, 2009
In the cow pasture below the Tre Cime de Lavaredo, after climbing Spitagoras, a 12-pitch 10a route. <br /> <br />Photo by <a href='/u/bruce-hildenbrand//11057'>Bruce Hildenbrand</a>

John Hegyes wrote:
Actually, I didn't say anything of the kind. I never mentioned Mussy Hooks. I haven't seen any specifications on them, but if they are "made in China", I'd say I'd be pretty suspicious of them. My point is anybody can forge a hook and stamp a rating. A legitimate company however has invested a lot of money in testing and certification that the cheap knock off companies bypass. That's the difference between a good hook and a cheap one.

If cost were no object, I agree that using products manufactured with strict quality-control standards is the best course. However, I suspect that the cost of these ultra-high-quality hooks is far more than is reasonable for the light-duty use they get in climbing applications.

I suspect that the made-in-China MussyHooks aren't manufactured with strict quality-control standards either. However, at least some of them have been tested by Fish, and they have been used with success at rock-climbing areas for a number of years. I know of no field failure reports, and would be very surprised if that ever happened.

My personal experience with MussyHooks is that they have shown little wear after several years of use on popular climbs. Are they the highest quality hooks in the world? No. Are they strong enough and reliable enough for lowering anchors on rock climbs? Yes.


FLAG
By John Hegyes
From Las Vegas, NV
Apr 24, 2009
South of Windy Peak

And just to answer anybody that asks the question: Yes, I still climb with Black Diamond Camalots even though they are now made in China apparently. That would be an example of a company that can somehow maintain conformity with European Union standards - "CE", while manufacturing products in China.


FLAG
By JLP
From The Internet
Apr 24, 2009

I think the anchors in the OP are overpriced, unservicable, and less redundant than cheaper alternatives. I don't like them at all.

I think the mussy hooks are fine. If you are freaking about a bunch of worthless certs and place of manufacture for an obviously big fat honkin' chunk of metal (2 of them...) ...

I think the best anchor is simply a fat chain with quicklinks. 3/8" or so. TR all season on them, as people do anyway, then replace the wearable items for less than the cost of a biner.


FLAG
By Darren Mabe
From Flagstaff, AZ
Apr 24, 2009
wham bam hand jam. Wrapping up the final moves of Twist of Fate, Oak Creek Canyon. <br /> <br />photo: Blake McCord

Matt TeNgaio wrote:
anyone familiar with this style of anchor? climbinggearinc.com/chain-anchors-p-493.html I'm looking at alternatives for sport routes.


back on track.
those work a bit better for rap/belay station IMO. for sport, lately i have fancied a quicklink on each hanger, and a biner hanging from each.. example, (minus the hook). now if everyone plays nicely, then 1)no one will booty the biners, and 2)anyone can swap them out when they wear down. everyone has spare biners to leave.


FLAG
By Jake D.
From Northeast
Apr 24, 2009

The folks are Rumney have been moving towards this set up minus the hooks. Except with multiple links of big chain depending on the need for that anchor (distance apart..unlevel bolts due to rock etc)


I like it because it discourages TRing through the anchor you can always rig something like this if you have a noobie who doesn't know how to clean anchors


FLAG
By AnthonyM
Apr 24, 2009
Maroon Bells-Bell Cord Couloir

I think what John was saying is that there is no way to know how reliable the hooks are. You may get batch of good hooks which will withstand forces greater than 7,000 lbs... Every once in awhile you will get one (either batch or unit)that is not as high of quality. That's why I like the certifications (UIAA, etc.) because it helps to ensure that there is a constant level of quality-with 100% of the products. Many defects are not cosmetic and I do not trust that small chance of using one that got ran over by a fork-lift or that was just produced incorrectly.


FLAG
By JLP
From The Internet
Apr 24, 2009

That 7k lbs is almost certainly not a breaking strength. I would guess the safety factor here is around 3-5, 10-20 k-lbs is more what I would expect just at the weld. The other 2 componants are likely way stronger.

You need a certain level of engineering and quality control to take a couple pop cans and make them into a biner capable of holding long falls. However, you do not need a whole lot to take a blob of steel and make it capable of holding a few hundred lbs. The worst I see happening, ever, is one of the welds failing. However, there are 2 welds per part, and 2 parts per anchor. I'm just not seeing an accident waiting to happen here.


FLAG
By John Hegyes
From Las Vegas, NV
Apr 24, 2009
South of Windy Peak

JLP wrote:
I would guess the safety factor here is around 3-5, 10-20 k-lbs is more what I would expect just at the weld.

When a safety factor is not available you have to assume it is "1". To guess is a big mistake. Again, the problem with the China knock-offs is that safe working load generally equals breaking strength. And neither statistic is reliable due to lack of controls.

That's all, I'm done beating a dead horse. Go buy your cheap gear and good luck to us all!


FLAG
By Brian in SLC
Apr 24, 2009
Climbing in Smuggler's Notch

Matt TeNgaio wrote:
anyone familiar with this style of anchor? I'm looking at alternatives for sport routes.


Yeah, I use them all the time. And the Fixe ones too.

I like that they have a ring on the bottom. Seems to spead the wear and tear out a bit more than a fixed biner, hook or rapide, which nest the rope in the bottom and will groove out in the same place over time.

Also buy just the ring and attach with a rapide to a hanger, too.

Cheers.


FLAG
By Ron Olsen
From Boulder, CO
Apr 24, 2009
In the cow pasture below the Tre Cime de Lavaredo, after climbing Spitagoras, a 12-pitch 10a route. <br /> <br />Photo by <a href='/u/bruce-hildenbrand//11057'>Bruce Hildenbrand</a>

Brian in SLC wrote:
Yeah, I use them all the time. And the Fixe ones too. I like that they have a ring on the bottom. Seems to spead the wear and tear out a bit more than a fixed biner, hook or rapide, which nest the rope in the bottom and will groove out in the same place over time. Also buy just the ring and attach with a rapide to a hanger, too. Cheers.

Agree that grooving out can be a problem for fixed biners, chains, and quick links -- but not for MussyHooks. These babies have 1/2"-thick steel at the bottom wear point. The time required for these to wear out from toproping and lowering will be measured in decades, not years. Hooks I installed two years ago on a popular route have yet to show any significant signs of wear.

It's a $5 part that can easily be replaced...and the advantage of not having to untie to thread the rope is a big plus over rings, chains, and quick-links, both for safety and speed.


FLAG
By Evan1984
Apr 24, 2009

JLP wrote:
I think the anchors in the OP are overpriced, unservicable, and less redundant than cheaper alternatives.


Please elaborate; I recognize that "the best" setup is largely personal, so this isn't an attack, I just want your perspective.

They've been servicing me just fine; what is you issue with them? 2 bolt hangers, a rap ring, and a foot of chain for 12.95 doesn't seem all the more espensive than a couple bolt hangers and beefy rap links or piece of chain.

How do you figure it is less redundant?

Evan


FLAG
By Matt TeNgaio
Apr 24, 2009

Fuck man, why does every post have to turn into a pissing match. I appreciate all the feedback but how about saving the over-technical and personal slamming for somewhere else.

All these set ups that everyone has mentioned work fine. I've installed mainly chains (in various combos) and "sport" style (like the Fixe Sport Hooks, Cold Shuts if you will, and like those but they are overpriced IMO. I believe one can install a safe anchor setup for under $15.

Anyway, thanks, all. Keep the positive and helpful comments coming.


FLAG
By Evan1984
Apr 24, 2009

^^^I think I made it pretty clear that it wasn't a personal attack.

I am still curious as to JLP's aversion to these. I understand the "these aren't my favorite anchors" position but "unserviceable" and "I don't like them at all" are much stronger statements; statements that usually come from a significant personal experience. So, I am curious as to what makes him think this as I don't want to run into the same problems.


FLAG


Follow replies to this topic? Notify me at the top of web site.
1

Email me.
Page 1 of 2.  1  2   Next>   Last>>