SteveZ wrote: the mindset and approach changes between easy/dangerous and hard/safe. I would even expand it to say you could flip those mindsets multiple times on the same pitch. Headpointing for example, as you move in and out of no-fall zones.
I agree. I actually find that flip to be quite difficult when going from easy/dangerous to hard/safe. After climbing very cautiously through 50 feet of runout 5.9, it can be hard to turn down the caution and turn up the try-hard for the crux, even after you get good gear in.
The other direction I find easier. If you pull through a hard/safe section, which is then followed by an easier runout section, I think it is easier to tell youself "OK, I'm through the hard part, and now its easy and I'll be fine"
Also, I think I may have oversimplified things when naming those two types. The middle situation may actually be most common and the most challenging--sort of hard, sort of protected--where you are climbing a bit below your normal onsight level, on slightly fiddly or questionable gear. This is the zone I find intimidating, actually, since it carries the most uncertainty, and there is no factor that you can hang your hat on. In hard/safe mode, you put total trust in the gear. In easy/dangerous, you put total trust in your ability to climb in control. In the middle zone, though, you probably won't fall and the gear probably won't fail, but you could fall and the gear could fail. For me, the best example of this is all those Eldo 5.11s with RP protection. The uncertainty makes this type of terrain thrilling/rewarding for many climbers, which is why we end up doing it, but it is also the type of climbing that most seems to have the most likely path to an accident.
Of course, there is also hard/dangerous, but most of us don't spend much time there.