Petzl Conga 8mm for Anchors?
|
A friend gave me this rope the other day and I thought I could use it for building anchors (mostly TR) since it's described as "semi-static cord" (I think around a 4% elongation). But... I was just on the Petzl site and it said: |
|
I would take that warning literally as stated. Do not use that rope for fall-arrest. |
|
Sounds fine to me, to me it sounds like they're purely suggesting that it cannot take lead falls safely (i.e. the catch will be very sharp and many things will be unhappy: the rope, your body, the gear, and the belayer). Not a proper dynamic rope. |
|
gavinsmith wrote:Sounds fine to me, to me it sounds like they're purely suggesting that it cannot take lead falls safely (i.e. the catch will be very sharp and many things will be unhappy: the rope, your body, the gear, and the belayer). Not a proper dynamic rope.Okay, that's along the lines I was thinking - not a dynamic rope, not meant to take a fall. |
|
8mm cord is standard, and beefy. Most people use 7mm cord for anchor building, however, 8mm cord is on the thin end to be used as a static rope for long TR setups. This mostly has to do with abrasion over sharp edges. I use 7/8mm cord around trees, on bolts and on gear anchors, but I do not use it over edges when creating big anchors using trees or other points. Again the main concern is abrasion. |
|
Thanks for the help everyone. |
|
Reviving this thread, wondering how this rope would perform in glacier travel / crevasse rescue . Where it might be used to arrest a fall, but not a fall that would generally create a lot of force. Comparing it to petzl rad line, I can't see a whole lot of difference, except price. It's rated to 15 kn, pretty strong. |
|
Ira OMC wrote: Statics are great for glacier travel— your partner self arresting absorbs the force of the fall, not the rope. Pulley systems for rescue are more efficient with a static. The only glacier travel situation I’d be cautious with a static would be belaying off an anchor to cross a suspect snow bridge, which can be mitigated with a meat energy absorber. Rad line is more expensive because it’s light. |
|
Ira OMC wrote: Far as I can tell the Conga isn’t dry treated. Hard pass for use on a glacier. |
|
Ah, good point Matt ! |