Another Accident due to mis-use of the Gri-gri
|
There's never a never, and never an always. Quit telling people what belay device/method to use. If someone wants to use a plate, tube, gri gri, or hip belay who cares. It's none of your business what other climbers are belaying with at the crag. If someone's being blatantly "unsafe" then that's different but it's not wrong for someone to have a preferred method. |
|
The topic is not about what device to use but rather about how to use a device properly. The entire discussion boils down to the following picture from the Petzl manual: |
|
BigFeet wrote:"People get dropped due to the grigri being threaded backwards as well so it's not that simple." This is why you should always double check yourself and partner. A quick buddy check helps to lower or prevent these types of mishaps from even coming into the equation. Take 60 seconds before you start climbing to make sure everybody is on the same page.60 seconds? It doesent even take that. You can do it in 15. I quickly doublecheck that my bowline is tied right, I glance at my partner's buckles to ensure they are double-backed if applicable (rarely applicable these days), I abruptly yank on the climber-side strand of the GriGri to check it's threaded correctly (it wont lock if threaded backwards), and I check to ensure the carabiner is locked. All this can be done in about 15 seconds. |
|
I think the popcorn is almost ready |
|
20 kN, |
|
Top Rope, |
|
|
|
All I gotta say is, WOW. I can't believe this has gone on for so long! |
|
20 kn, I see your problem right in your last post. You should be tying in with a figure 8, not a bowline. |
|
BigFeet wrote:20 kN, Really, this is what you came away with from reading my post - how long one takes to do a safety check? I wouldn't try to work too hard on beating that boastful 15 seconds. I don't believe anyone would want you to miss any point. By the way, I've never actually timed my safety check, but it is good to know you are on top of this for us all. Regards, Edit to add: Take as long as you need for your safety check.Of course, however long it takes it takes. I am simply illustrating that it does not take long and therefore should not be skipped. |
|
Top Rope Hero wrote:Bwha-ha-ha-ha-haaaaaa! OhMyLanta, John. I cant even believe that after being away for a week that I have to double down on your bullshit. Before I do, let me make sure I get this right. Youre going to try to maintain your position and take what by your own admission is a third-hand account of an unconfirmed accident involving people you dont even pretend to know, mix in an obscure, mentioned-in-passing reference about possible consequences of poor belay technique, and and youre still going to lead this one-mad-man crusade to pervert how the world should use one of the safest belay devices in the world? A question of your sanity, or your sobriety, I cant figure out which. Look. For you, John, and for the kids scoring at home, I want to make absolutely clear what Im talking about. My objections have nothing to do with your delivery. Zero. Nada. This is not about how nice you pretend not to be or how effective you think this shout campaign of yours is. My every challenge to your positions is born of the sheer, wrongheaded bucket of ignorance from which your claims are fed. And yes, John, I certainly noticed your distracting, poorly-disguised ad hominem attacks against me and against others. For my part, Ive nothing against you as a personthat I know of. My challenge finds its fuel only from what I see as your wrong and reckless claimsthat and your crusading insistence on plying the rest of us with your misguided conclusions. Mine is not an argument of style or articulationIm just saying youre flat, dead wrong. Just so we havent forgotten, lets revisit your original claims (I've added bold, to some), compare them to what I like to call facts and a good dose of common sense, and well leave the bitterman, personal attacks aside: The grigri makes people complacent. Arrrrrrrnnnttt! Wrong. Category error. Complacency lies not in the material world, but in the hearts of those who would abuse it. See? You were already off to a bad start. THIS TYPE OF ACCIDENT IS HAPPENING FAR TOO OFTEN. In screaming all caps, no less. So OK, Chicken Little. You have evidence to back this claim? Some newspaper links, perhaps? Sherriffs reports? Citations from the American Alpine Clubs Accidents in North American Mountaineering journal? A catalogue of reports from trusted and notable climbing resources like the AMGA? How about at least some sketchy, third-hand accounts of accidents that happened when you werent even around to people you dont even know? Oh wait that IS what you bring to the table Look. John. Its great that you have a pocket full of (unsubstantiated, third-hand) anecdotes. But anecdotes arent evidence. Evidence isnt a data set. And data sets arent trends, trends that demand the very kind of robust and absolutist response you here insist on. No. Stories of the kind you bring us are, by their very nature, localized, individualized, and provide only the most restricted of narratives into any given account. Moreover, any grand, sweeping conclusions we could possibly hope to draw from them are, as we see here, highly vulnerable to whack misinterpretation and reactionary blunder. Now, again. If all you wanted to do was whine and wail about near mishaps and climbing tragedy, wouldnt mean much to me. Like I say, I usually let dumb shit go. But you do here persist, your reactionary behavior. Worse, you insist on pushing your reactions onto every one else. Heres more of your claims; lets not forget these bombs, which, again, according to you, in your own words, take precedence over maintaining a hand on the brake side of the rope: KEEP YOUR OTHER HAND OFF THE CLIMBERS STRAND. Again with the all caps. As if adults were incapable of responding to imperative in only the lower case. Never mind the fact that you still fail to provide any hard evidence for this ground-breaking new directive of yours. (Of yours. Not of the manufactures. Not of any nationally or internationally recognized climbing organization. Yours.) train [others] to keep their left hand OFF the climbers [sic] rope except when feeding And now you want us to simply take your wordno real-world evidence neededand pass that poison on. use only a few fingers to feed Ah excuse me, what planet are we belaying on? I still dont even know what this daffodil, dental-floss technique is supposed to look like. never wrap your hand around [the climbers side of the rope.] And there it is. A final, misguided injunction built on misinformation, fed by half-truths, and maintained by a whisper campaign of boogey men. John? I want again to make sure we are on the same page. I maintain no umbrage here, your delivery or your tone of voice or even you as a person. Its just that youre flat, dead wrong. Period. There is simply no evidence here, or anywhere else, that wrapping your hand around the climbers side of the rope conjures the Great Satan that youre here preaching against. Now, there is this: Grabbing the climbers-strand will prevent the Gri-gri from locking. Here, the bold and the italics are both yours. Ugh! To the point, I think herein lies your entire, misinformed problem. With this one claim you seem to think you maybe, kinda-sorta, halfsies have a handle on something. Or not, actually. Apparently, yes, if misused, the belayer can, it seems, induce failure in a belay device. Surprise, surprise. (Notice: I said belay device. Any belay device. ) See? Originally I said that I didnt know what the fuck you were talking about. I take that back. Because now I think I do. You, John Byrnes, Mountain Project administrator, from what youve written, show yourself to have a fundamental misunderstanding of how to safely use a grigrior really, any belay device for that matter. (Read carefully, I dont know this for a fact. Ive never climbed with you. And from how you profess to belay, I never will. All I have to go on is what you claim, and what you claim is whack. Before you get all flustered and throw out insults, read on...) Here is my point: I have taught belaying before. To dozens and dozens. Possibly hundreds. Both professionally as a rock climbing guide and personally, as someone who travels a great deal and has to rely on the belaying kindness of strangers. And the way I teach itthe way I was taught to teach ita belayer, regardless of how, regardless of what device she uses, has two and only two primary responsibilities: 1-Maintain control of the brake strand. 2-Maintain an appropriate amount of slack in the system. Thats it. Thats really all a belayer has to do in order to provide a safe catch, in order to do her job. Doesnt matter ifn shes fifteen or fifty. Doesnt matter if he uses a grigri, uses an ATC, uses a feral, half-rabid, foaming-at-the-mouth goat. Whatever and however the belay is given, so long as control of the brake strand is maintained, and so long as an appropriate amount of slack is out for any given situation, that belay is on. You, however, contend otherwise. You insist on a differentand as I intend to show, a highly irresponsiblemethodology for maintaining a safe and secure belay. In the first place, you would subvert the importance of maintaining control of the brake strand. Say its less important than keeping a hand wrapped around the climbers strand. Already youve got the whole idea wrong. Maintaining control of the brake strandnot even breathing is as important as that. (Note: hyperbole for comic effect.) Secondly, and far more importantly, you show yourself incapable, in my view, of correctly diagnosing problems in the belay system. Every single instance that you (or for that matter, anyone) talk about rope burns on a belayers hands, talk about the rope whipping/sliding/racing through the belay device (any belay device), talk about belayers dropping their lead climbers every time I hear that, I hear just that: belayers dropping their leaders. Belayers failing to maintain control of the brake strand. Belayers failing in what I as a lead climber insist is their primary responsibility. You see it differently. You would have us manufacture a flawed mode in a certain belay device to cover for the fact that a belayera flawed and imperfect humanhas failed, failed to maintain control of the brake strand. You even go on record saying as much, that you dont blame any of the belayers. Incredible! As in: Theres no credibility here in this belief! Myself, I cant think of a more dangerous way to teach climbing! Hey it wasnt YOU that dropped me, it was the grigris failure mode. Didnt I mention. A side note: Ive tried searching around for this failure mode of yours. And I found it to be just that: yours. The only other hit that comes up about it is is yours. Here on Mountain Project. Only its about an entirely different problem with the grigri that you called its failure mode. And now you propose switching to call this other thing something entirely different, a Grab-the-Climbers-Strand Scenario. Scratch thatthis isnt a side note. This IS the problem. Youre just making shit up, John. Or rather, and again, let me say in no uncertain terms here: You demonstrate a fundamental misunderstanding of how this belay device functions. Really, by extension, how any belay device functions. Nothing, John, nothing obviates or excuses a belayer her responsibility to maintain control of the brake strand. No thing. If she were belaying around her hip and she let the brake strand slip, I would say the fault is hers, not her hip. If she were belaying with an ATC and let the brake strand slip, I would say the fault is hers, not the ATC. And if she were belaying with a grigri and let the brake strand slip, I, John, without hesitation, would diagnose the problem here as the belayers, for having let the brake strand slip. Period. End of that day. Regardless of whether, for a million whatever reasons, the cam engaged or not. Why? Because the grigri does revert to a tube-style device when the cam fails to engage. Let me say that again: When a grigris cam does not engage, it still imparts enough friction to act as a friction plate. (I myself have actually never seen a cam fail to engage, but the rumors persist ) I know this, John. How do I know this? I dont need to put on a lab coat and try all the crazy experiments you keep squawking about. I know this from three things, three things I was doing just last week in Mexico. First, I lower my climbers. Simple! Crank the grigri wide open (cam fully DIS-engaged) and dirt the leader safely to the ground. Cant do that, John, without enough friction on hand. Friction that could and should be employed if, for whatever fantastical reason, the cam didnt engage. Second, I repelled with the grigri. Often do. Again, crank the device wide open (again, disengaging the cam) and control descent by maintaining control of the brake strand. Another real-world example of how the cam assist is only that, an assist. (A note: I know that these first two are often done by feathering the cam, a careless and destructive procedure. Do that long enough and you will wear a groove in the cam, defeating its brake assistance.) Finally, though Ive never done it myself, Ive been the victim of someone else threading me backwards through the grigri. Long, obvious story short: the backwards threaded grigri still held my fall, still allowed my belayer to lower me, no cam-assist used. The grigri is NOT an auto-locking device, John. (Your train of thought can pull into no other station of conclusion.) Its not the climber who engages the cam when she falls; its the belayers proper control of the brake strand that causes the cam to engage. Its correctly advertised as a brake assist device. The braking (and braking responsibility) is still on the belayer. You, however, do this mental gymnastics end-around thing and think the problem is in the device. Misdiagnosis, John. You are completely missing the forest of the problem for the trees of your misdiagnosed failure mode thingy. Or something like that. Just to be tedious and long-winded, let me put this another way: Lets say the cam doesnt engage. Lets say that Zeus himself pissed down from Olympia all the rusting urine needed to freeze shut all the grigri cams ever made, and if a wild pack of Vegas whores greased all the rope channels with whats left of their spent jars of Vaseline and further, if we lashed all the remaining Aerojet Rocketdyne RS-25 Space Shuttle engines thrusting upwards on the climbers strand then .then well OK, in THAT case I do suppose we can excuse the belayer. But John, if a belayer loses control of the brake strand, regardless of whether the grigris cam has engaged, then I find that belayer wholly, and 100% at fault. Maintain control of the brake strand. Period. True of a hip belay, true of the ATC, true of the grigri. Your understanding of these incidence are a misdiagnosis of the problem. The grigri, despite your assurances that its just a fail machine waiting to happen, does in fact work just fine without the cam. I say again, if the cam does not engage, for whatever myriad and sundry reasons, a belayer would still have plenty enough friction available to fulfill his principle responsibility, to maintain control of the brake strand. Nothing changes this. Not wrapping your hand around the climbers strand, not distracting bouldering hotties, not nuthin. In other words, if a belayer cant maintain control of the brake strand with the cam disengaged, theres really no hope for humankind. If not on a grigri, then not on an ATC, certainly not with a hip belay. We all die. You claim otherwise. You would excuse or worse, ignore such carelessness in a belayer; I would not. I would never be as irresponsibly forgiving with my belayers. I would, in fact, simply teach them the importance of maintaining control of the brake strand. To sum it all up: Yes, I do here recognize that folks are saying that occasionally, very occasionally people being belayed with a grigri and being dropped. Sounds piece of shit. But to turn that around and blame a decades-old belay device, to manufacture a back-asswards reason why the machine is failing is simply the ethos of crazytalk. If the grigri were actually failing, I would of course want to jump on board. But nothing here and nothing Ive ever heard or seen proves you out, John. That accidents are happening, OK. No argument. None. But I say again that if you think not grabbing the climbers strand is in any way the answer that you completely misdiagnose the problem (not a little, completely). More to the point, I say it IS the problem. Why? Because your flat-earthed conclusions are at best misguided and misapplied. Ill give it to you, you make a lot of noise. Loud, inflammatory remarks do indeed garner attention. And you undoubtedly count on the confusion to disguise your lack of adequate facts. Finally, dressing up your conclusions in bold face and a lot of exclamation points probably wins you the occasional convert, too. But Im not buying. Your methods dont, at all, solve the underlying problem. (Dont even get me fucking started on your l If people are dropping their climbers, theyre dropping their climbers. And thats all I see here: a lack of ability to maintain adequate control of the brake strand. Casually handing out amnesty to belayers and blaming a device instead is, in my estimation, gross negligence. A dangerous way to climb. Yes, better instruction on how to use any belay device is important. Its critical. Petzls instructions are more than adequate, they perfectly match the functioning and the design of their device; I give those instructions all the time. But your proposals, John, unless you bring something new to the table, are whack and wrongheaded. And I dont care what titles you hold or how loud your delivery. If youre gonna just say dumb shit, bash the grigri or whatever Ill likely let that go. Just as I said. But if you insist on publicly anointing yourself principle author, licensed to rewrite the fundamentals of how best to use the grigri, I am going to tell people just as loudly that you are flat, dead wrong. youtube.com/watch?v=kTwo8MW… No personal offense, my man. Just calling out bullshit when I see it. ~R. Kelly Liggini'll have what he's drinking |
|
^ ...and that is the end of this thread. |
|
2500+ words! And such devotion ... |
|
I got into an argument with Zeus in the Tetons....it wasn't pretty |
|
Bill Lawry wrote:2500+ words! And such devotion ... .... Lets say the cam doesnt engage. Lets say that Zeus himself pissed down from Olympia all the rusting urine needed to freeze shut all the grigri cams ever made, and if a wild pack of Vegas whores greased all the rope channels with whats left of their spent jars of Vaseline and further, if we lashed all the remaining Aerojet Rocketdyne RS-25 Space Shuttle engines thrusting upwards on the climbers strand then .then well OK, in THAT case I do suppose we can excuse the belayer. .... Carry on ... wait, what am I saying?!?You read that whole thing? Go take a scramble; you have too much free time. |
|
Agreed! ... almost time. Perhaps someone will bring a gri-gri as an aide to our staying on-topic while outside. |
|
An interesting thread:~) |
|
This thing's still going? I think it's been solved:
Pick any three and we're done! |
|
supposedly yes....a talisman or good luck piece to ward off evil spirits....yeah...fail. |
|
Tim Lutz wrote: Is it French for 'sport climber cheater death machine'?No. It's French for 'poodle'. |