Graffiti or History?
|
The original inscription was an unobtrusive memorial to a local legend. Whoever defaced it by scratching over it did us all a disservice and created an unsightly blemish on the rock. It angers me that someone would do that. If the initial inscription was seen as graffiti, who's the genius that would think the rock could be somehow repaired by further damaging the rock? I'd support the placement of a plaque. |
|
John Hegyes wrote:The original inscription was an unobtrusive memorial to a local legend. Whoever defaced it by scratching over it did us all a disservice and created an unsightly blemish on the rock. It angers me that someone would do that. If the initial inscription was seen as graffiti, who's the genius that would think the rock could be somehow repaired by further damaging the rock? I'd support the placement of a plaque.Unfortunately, even a well placed plaque is not immune to random douchebaggery. The fact that another climber did this, is even more deplorable. |
|
RG should be admired for his contributions to the Redrock climbing community and believe some sort of memorial is not uncalled for in his honor. |
|
Sorden wrote: I think it's just cooler when a plaque memorializing a fallen climbing partner is left somewhere only climbers will see it.I'm glad you like how that memorial was done. :-) |
|
The difference between an Anasazi pictograph, or even names from early wagon trains, and this carved inscription is that Vegas was not an enormous city, expanding straight for the canyons, and there were not thousands of people in the Red Rock every day. |
|
I don't know of the gentleman in question. But many of us who make the wilderness our livelihood are actually quite sensitive to leaving our everyday surroundings the way we found them. It is egocentric for the human race to constantly leave memorials in my opinion, graveyard or otherwise. One's graffiti is another's memorial. Who has the moral compass to draw that line? Can't we all just accept our fate? Once you are gone, there are memories. Once those are gone that is it. |
|
Stich wrote: I'm glad you like how that memorial was done. :-)Always been curious, if you don't mind please, who was Angus? Thanks! |
|
M Sprague wrote: Remembering a friend, history - all good, but isn't there a better way?Well if you asked the Ragged Mountain Foundation here in CT they would say placing a large metal plaque at the base of the most famous climb on their cliff despite a strict no fixed protection clause and ardent opposition to any changes from the natural state of the cliff (even fixed top anchors to help save the cliff from climber impacts). It's funny but I often find these engraved/fixed memorials hypocritical because what was loved was altered to remember the other. I really like the Angus stone above... works on many levels. Jim Adair |
|
Sorden wrote: Always been curious, if you don't mind please, who was Angus? Thanks!link |
|
Glad some of you like the memory rock for Angus. In answer to the question, "who was Angus"? He was my fiancee and died while climbing Anthill on Redgarden Wall 10-21-2004. Freak accident, he was strangled by his gear sling. |
|
Thank you Cindy, |
|
Here's a small memorial on the South Ridge of Mt. Superior in Utah. It's partway up the ridge, and you have to be a climber (or at least an adventurous scrambler) to see it. I thought it was nicely done. |
|
What's the matter Karsten? You getting bored over there in Sacramento? Given the amount of time you have spent in Red Rock, you should know that Red Rock is not a State Park. And if anybody has any videos of Vegas hoodrats TR'ing their way up routes to scratch out memorials to honor victims of a drive-by shootings, well, please share. Cultures collide. |
|