Shoe prices about to go up
|
CaptainMo wrote: Ryan - your comment strikes me as odd... on one hand you seem to be pointing the finger at others and saying "this is your fault, you voted for this," and in the next breath saying this is a good thing for our future. I'm confused.I'm not saying that this is a bad thing, and I didn't mean to say it was anyone's "fault." I was just pointing out that many many people have championed Barack Obama over the years because of his stance on social issues and his ideas about how to stop the middle class from disappearing. But many of these people don't think about the fact that all of the things Barry wants to do and all of the changes he wants to make are going to cost a shitload of money. They haven't thought about where it's going to come from. People want there to be a safety net for all Americans. Free health care, extended unemployment, etc. Well you're asking govt to spend a lot of money - they must raise taxes on everyone. Not just the rich - it won't be enough. The middle class will see tax increases at some point and so will corporations. You know how I have free healthcare and other "safety net" things here in the UK? I pay a 20% federal tax on everything I buy. EVERYTHING! Tell me Americans wouldn't freak out if that idea was talked about in the US. No, Americans only want to talk about the free health care and the safety net. They don't want to talks about who pays for it. The 99% wanted American corporations to bring jobs back to the US. Well, the best way to do that is to penalize a corporation who keep jobs abroad, and the only way to do that is through taxes. Higher wages will be paid by the corps who bring jobs home and higher taxes will be paid by corps who don't. Either way, the cost of goods is going to go up. We'll have riots again. Only this time it won't be about a lack of jobs - it will be about the cost of everything skyrocketing. Again, I think that this must happen. We have to pay for our free for all, buy everything, eat everything, own everything mentality of the past. But make no mistakes - it is going to fucking suck! My problem is that most people will vote for change and talk about it, but when the time comes for them to make sacrifices they bitch and moan. |
|
caughtinside wrote:So sportiva is going to be ok but mad rock is hosed?Same with Scarpa (italy) and Five Ten (various Asia)? Might have to make a stock-up trip to the HQ. |
|
Ryan, show some respect. I never called the previous President an insulting moniker, despite your assumption that all lefty liberals probably did. Just because you don't like his politics doesn't mean you can insult the head of the Executive branch by calling him "Barry". Sorry he won, and sorry your politics don't seem to mix with more than half of the rest of population. We lived through the previous President. I have the utmost confidence that you will too. |
|
Oh, and Gary Neptune's comment is the best... |
|
Ryan Williams wrote: Obama trade protectionism stuffDo we really believe that Obama supports heavy trade protections? This is an idea that has strongly fallen out of favor on either the left or the right over the past 2 decades. If anything, it is the Republican party which has recently made threats of increased tariffs, especially with regards to China. Of course, both parties are very guilty of heavily subsidizing farmers in states made important by the Electoral College. It seems likely to me that this is just posturing in negotiations, not that I won't be buying shoes now as a hedge. |
|
OldManRiver wrote:is this a discussion about shoe prices or politics? Politics are incredibly boring/annoying to talk about.hahaha and shoes aren't??? |
|
OldManRiver wrote:is this a discussion about shoe prices or politics? Politics are incredibly boring/annoying to talk about.Unfortunately in this instance the two are inextricably linked. I am waiting, though, for a political PAS thread... |
|
Tony T. wrote:Ryan, show some respect. I never called the previous President an insulting moniker, despite your assumption that all lefty liberals probably did. Just because you don't like his politics doesn't mean you can insult the head of the Executive branch by calling him "Barry". Sorry he won, and sorry your politics don't seem to mix with more than half of the rest of population. We lived through the previous President. I have the utmost confidence that you will too.Well I'll start by acknowledging that calling him "Barry" was demeaning. I wasn't trying to be insulting. I may not agree with all of the President's ideas about the economy and how to fix it, but that doesn't mean that I'm totally against the guy and it also doesn't mean that I blame him for the current state. I voted for him in 2008. In 2012 I voted not to vote. I don't believe that America will ever be served well by the current electoral system so I chose not to participate. The government is broken and voting to make it either bigger or smaller is not going to fix it. The politics of the problem don't matter. This has been going on for decades, through Republican and Democratic Presidents and Congresses. George W. Bush staged two wars using America's credit card while at the same time cutting taxes (revenue). Clinton deregulated the banks, but bankers had been interpreting the Glass-Steagall Act however they wanted Since Nixon. All the while Alan Greenspan sat back and watched it, thinking that it was good! The system has been misused and toyed with by everyone for longer than many of us have been alive. They made a lot of money (and a lot of mistakes) and they kept us quiet by making sure we were all either busy, stupid or rich, and that no matter what group you belonged to, you still had enough money to by a pair of Nike's. It's not just in the US. The Brits are the ones who invented the most insane financial derivative products. When US bankers got wind of how easy it was to make money in this fashion, they started doing it and ultimately got Clinton to make it LEGAL to do it. It was already legal in the UK, but now they are thinking of imposing laws here that are very similar to the ones that Clinton had repealed in '99. Ironic isn't it. The only difference is that in the UK, instead of making Nike's cheap, they made healthcare free and gave out tons of public housing and benefits. But their bankers were doing the same thing - making shit loads of money and keeping the public quiet. Now people here are addicted to their NHS and benefits just like Americans are addicted to their cheap goods. It's time to stop living in a dream world. Regardless of politics, people talk the talk, but few want to walk the walk. We have enjoyed the overindulgence of the past. All of us. Americans have enjoyed their low cost living and Europeans have enjoyed their social welfare programs. And now the time comes to pay for it, none of us want to. Tony T. wrote:Regardless, do I think it's a bad thing? No. These are luxury items and they've been avoiding paying import duties for years. Sorry guys, but we need the money for the rest of the country who tend not to have the luxury to pursue inherently selfish activities right now. Climbing borders on being an activity of the privileged classes. Like other international members have stated, welcome to the rest of the world's climbing shoe prices. Do you know how many jaws I have to pick up off the floor at work when Europeans and Asians see how cheap climbing gear is here? Italians and the French don't even get products made in their own country this cheap. You've been living in an economic fantasy for too long.Right on. I think we agree. Seriously, imagine paying 105 Euro for a pair of climbing shoes while living in Spain or Italy. I don't need to tell you what the economies are like there (horrible). Talk about a first world problem... if an increase in the prices of climbing shoes isn't one then I don't know what is. |
|
okay-so while the politics is interesting and all-what i want to know is what specifically is the tariff going to affect. Will all of La sportivas boots (and other companies) be affected-in other words will the shoes made in italy be affected or just the boots made in asia (or both)? |
|
ill bet the price of made in USA shoes go up as well ... |
|
Ryan Williams wrote: The 99% wanted American corporations to bring jobs back to the US. Well, the best way to do that is to penalize a corporation who keep jobs abroad, and the only way to do that is through taxes.Bringing manufacturing jobs back to America in a globalized world is a lot more complicated than that. Tariffs probably won't create good jobs at home -- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prote… |
|
Richard88 wrote:If prices do go up, all I see is a job opportunity for American climbers looking for a job in the climbing industry. If Sportivas go up to 200ish bucks then it would be lucrative for a company to manufacture shoes in the US creating decent paying jobs and putting an affordable product on the market by avoiding taxes on goods manufactured overseas. The benefit to the climber is they get a product for close to current prices and their buddy or climbing partner gets a sweet job making climbing shoes.That makes some rather unlikely assumptions. The whole reason why they are made overseas is that they'd already cost that amount if made here. So what they are doing is leveling the playing field with hatchet and saw. Maybe the manufacturing will come back here... but the price is still going up. Now, ask me what I think will happen to quality when pretty much everyone doing the job will be new to it... |
|
fyi, they are not doing this because it would be stupid. |