Over lap of mastercam and c4s
|
I have a rack of camelots down to size .5. I have been looking at getting mastercams to use as my small cams, they feel so much better than c3s. My question is do I need to get a number #3 mastercam or a .4 c4 to cover the size range? Looking at the usable ranges of those cams, it looks like I'm covered. I would love to hear your feedback on the issue. If you use the combination of those two cams, it would be awesome to hear what your rack looks like. Thanks. |
|
I just picked up a .4 for a double of my yellow and orange mastercams (seems a tiny bit smaller than the orange on the bigger end, although perfect overlap on paper). I've also got the red mastercam to offer a smaller head placement vs the .5 c4. This gives me options and doubles. If you have the $ or the need, go for the overlap. |
|
Matt N wrote:I just picked up a .4 for a double of my yellow and orange mastercams (seems a tiny bit smaller than the orange on the bigger end, although perfect overlap on paper). I've also got the red mastercam to offer a smaller head placement vs the .5 c4. This gives me options and doubles. If you have the $ or the need, go for the overlap. If you just want singles, get up to an orange mastercam and you'll be set. A go-to size for sure and where the smaller head width really starts to benefit.This is all correct, I really like the master cams under the 1 c4 I use red #4 and black #5 mastercams If you just want below a .5 BD get the orange #3 master cam. If you go down to the small sizes I like the 00 tcu over the 00 mastercam the 0 mastercam is fine. |
|
Range is shorter for the MasterCams, it goes Blue #1 MC then Yellow #2MC = BD.3 roughly speaking. Personally I only recommend the Blue MC and Yellow MC. |
|
Here is a list [of my rack] in order from smallest to largest: |
|
This is the specs I cam off with for the usable ranges. |
|
I've been using Master Cams for 2-3 years and I'm very happy with them. Especially in the sizes blue, yellow, orange, and red. Although I have a complete set those are my favorites. If carrying a single rack I usually go with Master Cams purple thru red and C4s .75 thru 3. If carrying a double rack I carry the .3, .4 , and .5 also. However, I'm currently trading out those sizes for Totem Basics. In my opinion the .3 and .4 are not very useful because the heads are too wide for the sizes. I have mixed feelings about the .5. |
|
Jeremy Riesberg wrote:This is the specs I cam off with for the usable ranges. Camalot C4: .4 Grey 0.65 - 0.85 .5 Purple 0.85 - 1.1 Mastercam: #2 Yellow 0.62 - 0.89 #3 Orange 0.74 - 1.04 Looking at those numbers, it shows that I really could just save myself the cash. Also, what's it that you guys dislike about the smaller C4s? I personally don't like how much the larger master cams flex when I engage the trigger. I used these two sites as my references: Mastercam range C4 rangeIn the smaller sizes, you can't really go buy manufacturer stated ranges. The small cam placements are affected by many other factors than range constraints. |
|
mugsy wrote: In the smaller sizes, you can't really go buy manufacturer stated ranges. The small cam placements are affected by many other factors than range constraints.Ageed. |
|
Chris Miller wrote: If you went with just the yellow mc and the .5 you would have a gap in your system.I use blue, yellow and then go to .5 C4 and don't find the gap noticable. There are a few placements where a .4 c4 fits perfect but the yellow mastercam is a little tipped out, but it is very uncommon and the yellow still fits, it is just not as good. I realized a few years ago when I was taking the orange tcu and two .5 c4's that I was actually bringing a triple rack not a double rack. You don't really need three cams in that size. In my opinion most people weight themselves down with way too many cams in the overlap sizes. |
|
David Appelhans wrote: I use blue, yellow and then go to .5 C4 and don't find the gap noticable.First placement on L. Baskerville Crack, at the end of the section that gets it an "R" rating, is too big for yellow metolius and too small for .5 C4, orange metolius tcu is bomber. There is a gap, and it can really matter. Head width can also be make or break, middle of the mild runout on Judas will take a solid yellow C3 in a pod, but the pod is too shallow for anything else in that range (i.e. yellow alien, yellow metolius). Placement protecting the beginning of the crux on L. Ski Track...bomber red tcu in a pod, sketchy anything else of the same size in that pod. I could probably list a dozen more given a little time to think on it, but those come to mind immediately. A mixed rack is an asset IMO. |
|
David Appelhans wrote: I use blue, yellow and then go to .5 C4 and don't find the gap noticable.I disagree with this Will S wrote: First placement on L. Baskerville Crack, at the end of the section that gets it an "R" rating, is too big for yellow metolius and too small for .5 C4, orange metolius tcu is bomber. There is a gap, and it can really matter... A mixed rack is an asset IMO.I agree with this. David Appelhans wrote: I realized a few years ago when I was taking the orange tcu and two .5 c4's that I was actually bringing a triple rack not a double rack. You don't really need three cams in that size. In my opinion most people weight themselves down with way too many cams in the overlap sizes.This is true, though; there is some tripling-up there due to overlap between Orange Metloius and BD 0.5. I have found that my options are better is I get rid of the second BD 0.5 and keep the orange Metoloius. YMMV |
|
Jon Moen wrote: I get rid of the second BD 0.5 and keep the orange Metoloius. YMMVThis is actually what I have switched to doing for the last year as well. |
|
We should argue about shoes next! |
|
Chris Miller wrote:We should argue about shoes next!TC pros suck! just kidding love them. |
|
David Appelhans wrote: TC pros suck! just kidding love them.Me too. |
|
IMHO, size/range overlap is more critical in the smaller sizes to get the strongest cam placement, especially in softer sandstone. For example, tipped out bigger cams like a #1 C4 are more forgiving than a tipped out #0.3. Besides, a few extra pieces in the small sizes really don't weigh you down. |
|
Anyone got the cam angle of mastercams vs c4? I heard that the mastercams have more holding power due to there cam angle, that means alot to me in the smaller sizes. Although im sure it levels out due to more surface area on the c4's. |
|
I love the combo of: |
|
ian watson wrote:Anyone got the cam angle of mastercams vs c4?13.25 vs 15. "Holding power" is mostly a marketing term. Aliens used/use about a 16. In reality, there are very, very, very few cases where this would make any difference at all. The tradeoff is, the smaller the cam angle the smaller the range. I'll take more range. YMMV. There are probably as many cases where the extra "holding power" would be detrimental as helpful. Think of a placement where the integrity of the rock is questionable...that smaller cam angle is more likely to blow the placement apart than a larger cam angle (though again, in reality this will almost never matter) |
|
Mugsy, that's a great size comparison list. |