Fuck yeah amendment 64

This thread is awesome.

"I know you are but what am I?

"I know you are but what am I?

You both appear to be a couple of petty children with your back and forth. How old are you guys?

How's about you both just do this via PM so the rest of us that want to talk about the actual ISSUE don't have to sift through your bitching?

youtube.com/watch?v=jVOZeT2…

Brian Wright wrote: Try as hard as I might in the 15+ years I have been smoking pot, I have never been able to make a quarter last a couple of months. But maybe that's just me

I too was shocked at how efficient his rationing must be! Two months for a quarter must be some kind of record, not even kidding. But isn't it a little dry by the end?

Can't wait to come out to CO at the end of Dec. We should get a MP meetup together to celebrate. haha. Try not to go off belay at the wrong time because you're baked. This happened to me last week; luckily I was in direct.

ChillFancy wrote:Can't wait to come out to CO at the end of Dec. We should get a MP meetup together to celebrate. haha. Try not to go off belay at the wrong time because you're baked. This happened to me last week; luckily I was in direct.

Jeez, sport climbing and weed definitely don't go well together (maybe it's actually that sport climbERS and weed don't go well together.

ChillFancy wrote:Can't wait to come out to CO at the end of Dec. We should get a MP meetup together to celebrate. haha. Try not to go off belay at the wrong time because you're baked. This happened to me last week; luckily I was in direct.

What people from other states don't seem to realize is that there won't be retail stores open until probably 2014. This is gonna be an interesting year.

Mike Lane wrote:It will be really interesting to see who supports individual choices or monolithic government rule. Watch what your Representative does with this bill. If s/he is a Nazi, vote them out next time.

I can see a non-Nazi explanation as to why a Representative may not support forcing a federal response one way or the other to the Colorado initiative.
One might conclude that putting the issue before federal lawmakers may get a result that few in Colorado would want(things like denial of federal funds), whatever they think about MJ and MJ laws.
Just pointing out that possibility of unintended consequences seems pretty high to me here.

Reginald McChufferton wrote:How old are you guys?

Old enough to know better.

Reginald McChufferton wrote: How's about you both just do this via PM so the rest of us that want to talk about the actual ISSUE don't have to sift through your bitching?

Couldn't resist responding here, to point out that by posting on that subthread, you continue it.
When internet posting, we are in one of those unique situations where you actually have to jump off of the bridge to ask the other bridge-jumpers if they would jump just because someone else is jumping.
Or maybe not? Maybe you could 'do that via PM', but hadn't thought of that?
Anyway, welcome to the fall. Hope the water is deep and the sense of humor/irony remains intact.