Mountain Project Logo

The Gipsy (new pro)

Original Post
Marty Theriault · · Quebec, QC · Joined Apr 2011 · Points: 310
RyanO · · sunshine · Joined Jun 2009 · Points: 145

That's pretty freakin' cool. Looks way easier to place than a big bro..

Phil Lauffen · · Innsbruck, AT · Joined Jun 2008 · Points: 3,098

It sounded like that guy didn't think they would work...

Derek W · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Jun 2008 · Points: 20
Phil Lauffen wrote:It sounded like that guy didn't think they would work...
That's just how Italians scream...
thecornyman · · Oakland, CA · Joined May 2010 · Points: 140

What was that thing he had all his gipsies racked on? Looked awkward and unnecessary.

Ryan Williams · · London (sort of) · Joined May 2009 · Points: 1,245

I think he had an extra plastic thing on his harness to rack them, otherwise they'd flop all around and whack you in the balls and such.

I don't think those are really "new" though. I recall seeing them quite a while back. Obviously they haven't caught on...

Kilroywashere! London · · Harrisonburg, Virginia · Joined Oct 2009 · Points: 280

that plastic thing is called the kong owl, its supposedly an easy way to rack pitons or something like that

thecornyman · · Oakland, CA · Joined May 2010 · Points: 140
froggy wrote:that plastic thing is called the kong owl, its supposedly an easy way to rack pitons or something like that
Ah, makes sense that I've never seen or needed one then. Cheers.
Mark Roth · · Boulder · Joined Jan 2008 · Points: 14,062

Seen that idea before... rob.calm has an old one I believe?

The #6 Gipsy only covers up to a Green Big Bro, at almost twice the weight!
#6 Gipsy 485g
#3 (green) Big Bro 264g

http://www.kong.it/doc/KONG_GIPSY.pdf

Wiled Horse · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Dec 2002 · Points: 3,669
Mark Roth wrote:Seen that idea before... rob.calm has an old one I believe?
this one?


are they easier to place than that?
Mark Roth · · Boulder · Joined Jan 2008 · Points: 14,062

He doesn't seem to have a photo of it, but he does have one... I've seen it! People came up with all kinds of whacky stuff in the 70s and 80s.

Wiled Horse · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Dec 2002 · Points: 3,669

cant you just place a bolt when it gets that wide?

Tom R · · Denver, CO · Joined Sep 2008 · Points: 140
Darren Mabe wrote:cant you just place a bolt when it gets that wide?
That crack looks like it takes perfect bolt placements.
Ryan Williams · · London (sort of) · Joined May 2009 · Points: 1,245

Crack didn't look any wider than 5 and 6 Camalots, but what do I know.

brenta · · Boulder, CO · Joined Feb 2006 · Points: 75
Mark Roth wrote:The #6 Gipsy only covers up to a Green Big Bro, at almost twice the weight! #6 Gipsy 485g #3 (green) Big Bro 264g kong.it/doc/KONG_GIPSY.pdf
True. Another way to look at it is that the #6 Gipsy weighs less than a #6 C4 and covers a wider range. The fact that the Gipsies are numbered 4, 5, and 6 suggests that Kong has BD in mind rather than Trango. The Gipsy is probably harder to push than a cam, and probably easier to place than a Big Bro. It's unlikely to supersede either, but could be the ideal pro for some placements. Hard to say more for me without having any direct experience.
Azul77 · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Jul 2011 · Points: 0
Tom R wrote: That crack looks like it takes perfect bolt placements.
There is so much wrong with What u just said. There is no reason to bolt a crack. It is a crack and it takes protection that is not destructive. Bolts r for face climbing or when there is unnecessary risk without one. Lets keep climbing good and hard, lets face it. Some routes shouldn't just be casted off by Joe sport climber. That is a GOOD thing. Knowledge is power
"I remember when sex was safe and climbing dangerous" Jim Bridwell
P.s. if u don't know who that is. Learn
Wiled Horse · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Dec 2002 · Points: 3,669
WanderLust wrote: There is so much wrong with What u just said. There is no reason to bolt a crack. It is a crack and it takes protection that is not destructive. Bolts r for face climbing or when there is unnecessary risk without one. Lets keep climbing good and hard, lets face it. Some routes shouldn't just be casted off by Joe sport climber. That is a GOOD thing. Knowledge is power "I remember when sex was safe and climbing dangerous" Jim Bridwell P.s. if u don't know who that is. Learn
dude quickdraws are lighter than big cams!!

isn't Jim that guy that did a couple of FA's in Yosemite?
Tom R · · Denver, CO · Joined Sep 2008 · Points: 140
Peter Adamson wrote: Are you honestly saying that we shouldn't bolt that crack? It's clearly too wide to be safely protected, the notion that it doesn't deserve bolts is simply ridiculous. I probably misunderstood you though, I don't think anybody can make a case for leaving these wide cracks so unsafe.
Awesome.
Tom R · · Denver, CO · Joined Sep 2008 · Points: 140
Darren Mabe wrote: dude quickdraws are lighter than big cams!! isn't Jim that guy that did a couple of FA's in Yosemite?
Sweet.
Tom R · · Denver, CO · Joined Sep 2008 · Points: 140
WanderLust wrote: There is so much wrong with What u just said. There is no reason to bolt a crack. It is a crack and it takes protection that is not destructive. Bolts r for face climbing or when there is unnecessary risk without one. Lets keep climbing good and hard, lets face it. Some routes shouldn't just be casted off by Joe sport climber. That is a GOOD thing. Knowledge is power "I remember when sex was safe and climbing dangerous" Jim Bridwell P.s. if u don't know who that is. Learn
"Sarcasm: a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain." -Merriam-Webster
If you don't know who that is, learn.

Edit to add: Sorry. That violated Guideline #1.
cellige · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Dec 2010 · Points: 0

There is no way that that device is conceptually stable...

Guideline #1: Don't be a jerk.

Climbing Gear Discussion
Post a Reply to "The Gipsy (new pro)"

Log In to Reply
Welcome

Join the Community

Create your FREE account today!
Already have an account? Login to close this notice.

Get Started