New Crash Pad Company
|
Yacov wrote:Top of the line open-cell foam for a 3X5X5 is roughly $35. Closed cell is a little more. Makes you wonder why pads cost so much. I'm thinking of doing two lines. All foam and air/foam. The idea being all foam for an economically driven climber who wants a classic quality pad. The air/foam would be a compressible pad so transport would be easier and that you could take on a flight. I'm going to work on some ideas this weekend.Is that 3" x 5' x 5'? Remember you would want a combination of closed and open cell. Plus fabric over that. Plus a suspension system. Plus hours worked. Plus profit (I highly doubt you will pay yourself how much most sewing companies would pay their workers). Plus shipping. |
|
JoolerMcG wrote: Is that 3" x 5' x 5'? Remember you would want a combination of closed and open cell. Plus fabric over that. Plus a suspension system. Plus hours worked. Plus profit (I highly doubt you will pay yourself how much most sewing companies would pay their workers). Plus shipping.No doubt there's not a lot of profit room if you want to keep it affordable. I'm going to play with some numbers this weekend. It's definitely not an endeavor to rake in the dough, just something that would be giving back to the climbing community. We have in house foam cutting/ordering, sewing and shipping. It's more about the design parameters and getting the cover material. I don't think we stock durable enough material right now. As far as Flashed: I'm curious what's the consensus on these. There's a lot of features on these and they are way expensive. Anyone have a lot of experience. They look pretty sweet and I've never used one or seen them in stores. |
|
Yacov wrote: No doubt there's not a lot of profit room if you want to keep it affordable. I'm going to play with some numbers this weekend. It's definitely not an endeavor to rake in the dough, just something that would be giving back to the climbing community. We have in house foam cutting/ordering, sewing and shipping. It's more about the design parameters and getting the cover material. I don't think we stock durable enough material right now. As far as Flashed: I'm curious what's the consensus on these. There's a lot of features on these and they are way expensive. Anyone have a lot of experience. They look pretty sweet and I've never used one or seen them in stores.Flashed is a Canadian company, you'll see them a lot on the west coast (of Canada), though I THINK Trango is their supplier to the states. Friends of mine have a range of their pads (I'm an Organic user, sorry Flashed ;) ), and have used both their AIR pads and their foam ones. The foam, I find, is quite soft compared to some other companies. Not TOO soft, but definitely could be firmer. The AIR technology is pretty cool. Makes the pad feel firm when compressed rapidly (hard/high falls) and soft when compressed slowly (lower, lighter falls). A few drawbacks of the AIR technology. Its heavy compared to the foam pads...crazy eh? Also, once compressed it takes 24hrs to decompress. Therefore its great for flying, but sucks if you just want a bit of space for a road trip (assuming you want to climb asap). Thats all I know about it, sorry I couldn't be of more help. Good luck! |
|
Here bud, one more thing. Have a look at this :) |
|
I like the voodoo pad for the soft velvet (makes a soft bed and grippy landing). The bittersweet pad is large but not very cusiony. I remember a friend of mine making a pad and said it ended up costing him twice what a commercially made pad would have PLUS TONS OF TIME! Hey man, Just Do It. What do you think everyone told Yvon Chounard, Thompkins and Hap, Kelty and others when they said "Hey what do you think about this?" |
|
JoolerMcG - Thanks so much for the info. The link was inspiring and what you said about the air pad re-inflating slowly is helpful. The system I have in mind should have that fixed. I'm astonished it's heavy. It looks like the next step in pad technology is going to be air, which I'm kind of happy about. Now to see if we can make it affordable. |
|
Mike Anderson wrote:I agree that this is a long shot, but I think a real innovation would be some form of inflatable crashpad that could be packed into a smaller space than traditional crashpads. This would make airline travle much easier, and encourage carpooling, as well as make long approaches easier. The tecnhical challenges would be remote inflation, getting the pressure right and absorbing the impacts without rupturing. It would be a great undergrad Senior Design project or Master's thesis for an engineering design student.I recall reading about this idea years ago. Not sure how much it cost back then, you would definitely have to adjust it for inflation. [rimshot!] |
|
I think that most boulderers are going to want a sturdy foam comparable to organic. Sure its hard when its brand new, but give it a few months and its virtually perfect. The top layer that Organic uses is great for eliminating the gap in the hinge. Straps and belt buckle that aren't cheap but are based on a backpack model is key. Being able to strap various pads together (for carrying and arranging together) can be done better. No one is doing this right now. Of course METAL BUCKLES that are easy to use. The organic ones are small, the flashed ones and BD ones are stupid hard to use. Plastic buckles have no place for the type of use that a normal pad goes through. The only company that has gotten this right so far is Mad Rock. Some sort of extra padding/heavy material that will keep the edges of the pad from ripping (BD Mondo does this right now). Point is to have the best foam, a comfy adaptive carrying system, and durability. Ignore the other bells and whistles (atleast for the time being). |
|
tcamillieri wrote:I think that most boulderers are going to want a sturdy foam comparable to organic. Sure its hard when its brand new, but give it a few months and its virtually perfect. The top layer that Organic uses is great for eliminating the gap in the hinge. Straps and belt buckle that aren't cheap but are based on a backpack model is key. Being able to strap various pads together (for carrying and arranging together) can be done better. No one is doing this right now. Of course METAL BUCKLES that are easy to use. The organic ones are small, the flashed ones and BD ones are stupid hard to use. Plastic buckles have no place for the type of use that a normal pad goes through. The only company that has gotten this right so far is Mad Rock. Some sort of extra padding/heavy material that will keep the edges of the pad from ripping (BD Mondo does this right now). Point is to have the best foam, a comfy adaptive carrying system, and durability. Ignore the other bells and whistles (atleast for the time being).I find the Flashed buckles are way easier to use than the Organic buckles... |
|
Another thing to realize is that people have a number of different uses/desires in their crash-pads. |
|
not climbin' much anymore wrote:http://www.asanaclimbing.com/KJSignaturePad.htm $350 for a crash pad...f!#$*' @. Yeah, a high quality, low cost pad would be cool. Wow, they are really proud of their gear. Hmmmm...I wonder if I could get a p/bro-deal on that Asana pad?CHeck out the AIR Flashed pad, something like $479. CRAAAAAZY. |
|
If you guys think I'm a dick, just wait until Mr. Reality comes to visit. |
|
JoolerMcG wrote: I find the Flashed buckles are way easier to use than the Organic buckles...Totally disagree. I think the Flashed buckles are terrible . Climbing mag seems to agree with me: "This gives it a huge gear-carrying capacity and spares the harsh taco-style bending of the foam, but makes it one of the most time-consuming pads to pack, a problem exacerbated by fiddly D-ring buckles." climbing.com/print/equipmen… The opening is very small on these buckles and when the webbing begins to fray it is a pain to cinch it through there.... The organic buckles aren't great, but the opening is larger and easier to use than the Flashed. My favorite is still the Mad Rock buckles. Compare for yourself: Mad Rock Buckle Flashed Buckle |
|
tcamillieri wrote: Totally disagree. I think the Flashed buckles are terrible . Climbing mag seems to agree with me: "This gives it a huge gear-carrying capacity and spares the harsh taco-style bending of the foam, but makes it one of the most time-consuming pads to pack, a problem exacerbated by fiddly D-ring buckles." climbing.com/print/equipmen… The opening is very small on these buckles and when the webbing begins to fray it is a pain to cinch it through there.... The organic buckles aren't great, but the opening is larger and easier to use than the Flashed. My favorite is still the Mad Rock. Compare for yourself:Shame the rest of any Madrock pad is trash ;) |
|
i agree, I hate flashed buckles. I don't care too much for the organic ones either.I think metolius buckles are the best in the business though. I'm in the process of replacing the ones on my organic pad with them and then it will be perfect |
|
I love the buckles on the flashed pads, a bit fiddly to use the first time but it grew on me, mad rock buckles also good but the foam is awful.. Flashed foam is a tiny bit too soft to the touch, but after four years of heavy use still catches like a firmer pad.. |
|
What ever happened to plastic bukles on crash pads. I have never liked the metal buckles on crash pads. Just leave enoungh room so you can replace the buckles easly. Cheap Big Fat 12" Pads for Climbing Gyms that don't cost $500. |
|
Plastic buckles get stepped on and landed on, and they break. Metal buckles are a much better idea. |
|
Yakov, I primarily climb trad, but I do boulder occasionally. I have a Metolius pad, which folds in two on a bevel and has a combination of dense close cell on top with less dense open cell on bottom. The metolius buckles are a lot like the Mad Rock ones, and they seem like a good design. |
|
Air pads are already on the market. |