Mountain Project Logo

Crazyness on the Third Flatiron

Original Post
Phil Lauffen · · Innsbruck, AT · Joined Jun 2008 · Points: 3,098

My friend and I recently had a discussion about the crux(last) pitch of the third flatiron. The run out from the anvil-sling bothered him as the twenty or so feet afterward are the hardest moves on the climb. He suggested that it would be a good place to put a bolt, as there are many beginner climbers moving through the area, and it isn't a totally pristine location. I of course was shocked and dismayed at the idea. Put a NEW bolt on the third flatiron? That wouldn't honor the first ascensionist at all, there is no way the flatiron council would approve it, and WHY!? Its 5.4 at the most. Of course, a slip in that location would likely hurt a LOT, if not seriously injure the climber. The argument then goes that the climber should not be there in the first place. I know I'm just rambling, but what are your thoughts? Is there any way that this could, should, or would happen? Would you be up there the next day wielding a hack saw?

Mark Griffin · · Boulder, CO · Joined Apr 2006 · Points: 95

I agree with you Phil. No way it should have a bolt (regardless of the rating of the route). It's not really fair to say the bolt should not be there because it's "only" 5.4. Some people find those moves to be challenging and uncomfortable without the presence of pro. It's up to the individual to weigh the difficulty and available protection of a given route and make a decision about climbing it. The fact is it's an east facing flatirons route and the nature of these climbs is that they are runout. No doubt a fall here would be painful, perhaps dangerous.

In my opinion it would alter the character of the route which is a classic, historic, iconic one. Also, I don't think it would fly with the council, but it's certainly within anyone's rights to make the suggestion.

Phil Lauffen · · Innsbruck, AT · Joined Jun 2008 · Points: 3,098

Thats true. I guess the point I was trying to make with the 5.4 comment was that if you are not comfortable on 5.4 you should weigh the risks before climbing a run-out flabby slatiron.

Hank Caylor · · Livin' in the Junk! · Joined Dec 2003 · Points: 643

Bill (the man)Wright will explain the 3rd. So will his followers.I am one of them. HOLY COW!

It is a little funky, try the 1st in tennis shoes with no chalk, drunk and etc. etc.. Just bring your climbing shoes and you'll be fine

Tony B · · Around Boulder, CO · Joined Jan 2001 · Points: 24,665

A Bolt appeared on the First Flatiron's Direct East Face a few years ago. Nobody hacked it out right away. It was removed by official processes, if I correctly recall.

Paul Hunnicutt · · Boulder, CO · Joined Sep 2006 · Points: 325

I'd have no problem with a few more bolts on the standard route. On the first pitch is what springs to my mind. I don't remember anything horrible about the last pitch, but it has been a while. Most anyone who would care solos the route anyways, what do they really care?

Anything should/would have to go through the approval process...good luck with that one.

Chris Plesko · · Westminster, CO · Joined Oct 2007 · Points: 485
Paul Hunnicutt wrote:I'd have no problem with a few more bolts on the standard route. On the first pitch is what springs to my mind. I don't remember anything horrible about the last pitch, but it has been a while. Most anyone who would care solos the route anyways, what do they really care? Anything should/would have to go through the approval process...good luck with that one.
There is the good eyebolt not that far off the east bench on the standard route on the 3rd and then another not far off. Sure they're more than 10 feet apart but it's not really a big deal. My noob opinion is that there are plenty of bolts to clip if you know where they are and there is plenty of traditional pro available where there are no bolts.
J. Thompson · · denver, co · Joined Jan 2001 · Points: 1,425
Tony Bubb wrote:A Bolt appeared on the First Flatiron's Direct East Face a few years ago. Nobody hacked it out right away. It was removed by official processes, if I correctly recall.
Yep. I had something to do with that one.
In the end I believe it was Mtn. parks that did the removal.

A bolt on the third? I can't believe someone would even suggest it...it's that obsurd.

josh
Brian Adzima · · San Francisco · Joined Sep 2006 · Points: 560

I was under the impression the 3rd was "trade" free solo since the beginning of the previous century.

Dave Miller · · Boulder · Joined Feb 2006 · Points: 0

Save a bolt get some balls!

Tony B · · Around Boulder, CO · Joined Jan 2001 · Points: 24,665
Brian Adzima wrote:I was under the impression the 3rd was "trade" free solo since the beginning of the previous century.
It has been done in roller skates, though not everyone knows that the skates had fused wheels to prevent spinning. Point is that it is not a diffcult climb.
Paul Hunnicutt · · Boulder, CO · Joined Sep 2006 · Points: 325

guess I just like my ankles. the bolts on the first pitch are too high for my taste. I'll probably climb this again, but I wouldn't cry over one or two more bolts on the first pitch. so many more things to get worked up about besides bolts. oh god I said it.

but what is the point of this thread?...it isn't going to happen.

J. Thompson · · denver, co · Joined Jan 2001 · Points: 1,425
Paul Hunnicutt wrote: I'll probably climb this again, but I wouldn't cry over one or two more bolts on the first pitch.
I wouldn't cry over it either.
However.
If bolts were added to this incredible climb I would chop them and never say a word. Even if they were "approved".

Keep in mind this route is most likely free soloed more often than it's belayed.

I wonder if anyone has ever fallen on the first or last pitch?

josh
Sam Prentice · · Your Nat'l Forest · Joined Oct 2006 · Points: 200

so, just to get this straight, if an ambitious/naive newcomer, or a "casual mountaineer" with little technical experience decides to climb this route on a visit to the nexus (boulder) of a climbing Mecca (CO), and slips on the runout (a real possibility for said climber due to nerves), injures themselves badly... it's their fault?

I know.... first it's a 5.4 classic, next they'll be grid bolting the diamond for people who want something morethan the keyhole. Right. I have a hard time buying into the "slippery slope" argument given y'all have a committee overseeing where you can put a bolt. On the other hand, i guess the occasional bad press ("Iowan rock climber near death after raking 50 feet down 3rd flatiron") keeps the ethics intact and crowds at bay. Maybe.

John Maguire · · Boulder, CO · Joined Nov 2008 · Points: 195

I think that the route already has bolts on it, and one more wouldn't ruin the appearence. Who are you all kidding, the third has "CU" painted on it, really folks? I realize that it can be done in fused wheeled roller skates, tennis shoes, and drunk, but keep in mind this is not a secluded environment where one can go and escape civilization. This is not a refuge from the common place so that one can experience nature at its finest. This is a place where guys get high at the first belay, drink and toss there beer bottles, and families walk their dogs.

I am not saying that this route needs to be turned into a sport route but let's face it, if it was supposed to be hardcore and only free soled, it would not have all the belay rings on it. I'm just playing out that arguement that if your going to have any bolts on the route, they might as well be in the dangerous spot.

By the way, J. Thompson, this route is not free soloed more than it is climbed.

Phil Lauffen · · Innsbruck, AT · Joined Jun 2008 · Points: 3,098

....what have I created?

Kevin Currigan · · Lakewood · Joined Nov 2001 · Points: 345

The existing six bolts need to be upgraded-they need to be bigger!

Rich Farnham · · Nederland, CO · Joined Aug 2002 · Points: 297
Sam Prentice wrote:so, just to get this straight, if an ambitious/naive newcomer, or a "casual mountaineer" with little technical experience decides to climb this route on a visit to the nexus (boulder) of a climbing Mecca (CO), and slips on the runout (a real possibility for said climber due to nerves), injures themselves badly... it's their fault?
Yup.

Who's fault do you think it should be? The first ascensionist? Mountain Parks? The guidebook author? Maybe they should blame their friend who got them into rock-climbing in the first place?

-Rich
brenta · · Boulder, CO · Joined Feb 2006 · Points: 75
Phil Lauffen wrote:....what have I created?
Now let it work. Mischief, thou art afoot.
Take thou what course thou wilt.
Shane Zentner · · Colorado · Joined Nov 2001 · Points: 205

The First and Third Flatirons are already over-bolted. I don't want to sound like a jerk, but, honestly, there is no need for additional bolts on ANY pitch of the First and Third Flatirons.

I agree that the last pitch of the Third Flatiron is sparsely protected. When I led that pitch for the first time(1998-1999), I found it challenging and spicey. Yet, it was part of the learning process and growth - a bit of runout climbing makes one mentally stronger. A bolt on that pitch would ruin it for everyone else and take the excitement away.

Let the pitch remain as it is. Take a deep breath, place good gear, run-it-out, and revel in your victory.

John Maguire · · Boulder, CO · Joined Nov 2008 · Points: 195

Thats a good point shane...sometimes I like to intentionally not clip in pro just for the RUSH. Its also fun to smash your cams till they are cracked...Feel the adreneline as you wonder if they will hold or not!

Guideline #1: Don't be a jerk.

Colorado
Post a Reply to "Crazyness on the Third Flatiron"

Log In to Reply
Welcome

Join the Community

Create your FREE account today!
Already have an account? Login to close this notice.

Get Started