Route Guide - iPhone / Android - Partners - Forum - Photos - Deals - What's New - School of Rock
Login with Facebook
 ADVANCED


Member Since: Jul 7, 2005
Last Visit: 3 hours ago
Contact KCP


Point Rank: # 1,044
Total Points: 581
Last Year: 163
Last 30 Days: 3
40 Compliments
How do you get points?
Areas = 15
Routes = 10
Photos = 5
Page Improvements = 3
Comments = 1



Where has KCP been climbing?










Contributions


All 2063 | Routes 7 | Areas | Photos 54 | Page Improvments | Comments 242 | Posts 1457 | Stars 173 | Ratings 130
Page 6 of 10.  <<First   <Prev   4  5  6  7  8   Next>   Last>>

Contributed Comments

 

Location: CO : Boulder : Boulder Canyon : The Sport Park : Surprising Crag : ... : Frictionary (5.7)
By: KCP When: Aug 21, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: My girlfriend and I decided to try this place out today. We did about a half dozen of the moderates, up to mid 5.10, and thought this was the best route of all of them. The route follows an obvious, uncontrived path, and it is bolted intelligently. The moves are also very fun.


Location: CO : Boulder : Eldorado Canyon SP : Redgarden Wall : Redgarden - Roof Routes : Fire and Ice (5.12a PG13)
By: KCP When: Aug 3, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: I agree that a 5.11 climber would have his or her hands full on this route, although 12c is way off. I onsighted this route pretty easily, in 1990, right after taking three tries to stick the crux of Downpressor Man. There was no stopper move on the route - just sustained and relatively thin climbing most of the way.


Location: MA
By: KCP When: Jun 5, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: You guys should submit some photos of these areas.


Location: CO : Benefit for Steve Dieckhoff
By: KCP When: May 18, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: Hi Steve,

I am really sorry to hear about your health complications, although if anyone has the mental fortitude to give this thing a run for the money, it's you. I know that we have had our climbing ethics differences in the past, but I have always respected your desire to stay true to your beliefs.

Just remember that you have many friends in the Boulder climbing community, which is much better enduring this alone. Fight like hell, and we'll be rooting for you.

Cheers,

Ken


Location: UT : Moab Area : Arches National Park : Arches NP - Anchor Replacem...
By: KCP When: Feb 7, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: Thanks for the post, Steve. You are a reasonable guy, and I always appreciate your input.

My attempt at spreading a little lightheartedness among the crowd was not meant to dismiss the issue of what Dean did. Dean's exploit is already indelibly etched in the minds of most climbers. The media and these forums have helped to insure that.

It's not that the topic of access, as it relates to causing problems for fellow climbers, is trivial to me. My problem is that the general tone of consistent De... more >>


Location: UT : Moab Area : Arches National Park : Arches NP - Anchor Replacem...
By: KCP When: Feb 7, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: The point wasn't drivel, Pete, even if it was lost on you. Wow! I feel like a paper cut in a room full of alcohol swabs. Do some of you even know how to laugh at yourselves?


Location: UT : Moab Area : Arches National Park : Arches NP - Anchor Replacem...
By: KCP When: Feb 6, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: Brad,

Selective hearing seems to be a recurring theme in this whine fest. You should take a clue from Kirra, who had no problem recognizing how thoroughly I elaborated on my position. If you haven't gotten it by know, I am sorry to say that you just aren't that bright. Or maybe you do get it, but feel compelled to spend twenty more pages crying about it because you enjoy our company so much. Do you bitch about the guy who cut you off in traffic, nine months later? Are you still whining about th... more >>


Location: UT : Moab Area : Arches National Park : Arches NP - Anchor Replacem...
By: KCP When: Feb 6, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: You guys are priceless.

Click here for directions to Climber's World:
i9.photobucket.com/albums/a69/kencangi/ClimbersWorld.jpg


Location: UT : Moab Area : Arches National Park : Arches NP - Anchor Replacem...
By: KCP When: Feb 4, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: ""This thread feels like a reflection of our society.
The entire debate hinges on one issue."

This may be best explained by something said once by Steven Reiss, the Dept head of teh school of Psychology at OSU. To Paraphrase:
'When two sides argue and argue it is rarely the facts of the matter that are being debated, but the weight or validity of the fundimental values and motivations behind each point.'"


Mr. Reiss was a bright guy for saying it, and you, Tony, are equally bright for... more >>


Location: UT : Moab Area : Arches National Park : Arches NP - Anchor Replacem...
By: KCP When: Feb 3, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: "There is a difference between an error in social judgement, and an obvious professional judgement error that results in restrictions for a large number of people. If I were to make a professional judgement error in my work that had serious consequences for others in my profession, even if it was not technically illegal, I would at best be fired and at worst sued. Professionals can and should be held to a higher standard of judgement and conduct than others."

So exactly what are you su... more >>


Location: UT : Moab Area : Arches National Park : Arches NP - Anchor Replacem...
By: KCP When: Feb 3, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: By your position, Slim, all I can say is: Don't ever make an error in social judgment or we'll be gunning for you. You'd better stay on your game.


Location: UT : Moab Area : Arches National Park : Arches NP - Anchor Replacem...
By: KCP When: Feb 3, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: No problem, Brad. If things are sounding a little black and white so far, I'll add some color for you.

Here is a May 18, 2006 official statement from patagonia:

"Thursday, May 18, 2006
Patagonia's Stance on Dean Potter

Patagonia it seems is standing by Dean Potter for climbing Delicate Arch.Many individuals have asked us where we, as a company, stand on Dean's recent climb. Since last week, Patagonia has received hundreds of emails on the issue, many asking for a public stance. First of ... more >>


Location: UT : Moab Area : Arches National Park : Arches NP - Anchor Replacem...
By: KCP When: Feb 2, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: "How do you know why other people think and feel the way they do?"

Hmmm. Because they have posted it numerous times. For a minute there, I thought it was a trick question.

"Telling other people what motivates them is not a good strategy for making points in debates."

You mean like assuming that I am motivated by winning debate points?

All sarcasm aside, Ron, I am not here to win debate points. My intention has been to express an alternate viewpoint and then to leave it up... more >>


Location: UT : Moab Area : Arches National Park : Arches NP - Anchor Replacem...
By: KCP When: Feb 2, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: "Interesting thoughts and certainly philisophically fair, however...

Does that mean that everyone who smokes pot and thinks it should be legal to do so should go do it on the police station's front steps? If EVERYONE did, it would probably work. But if just a few did, they'd end up with fines and court costs- and possibly jail. And the cops would probably tighten enforecment.

I'm not saying I have answers to things, I'm just saying its hard to be philosophically 'pure.'"


Not philosop... more >>


Location: UT : Moab Area : Arches National Park : Arches NP - Anchor Replacem...
By: KCP When: Feb 2, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: Here is the situation in a nutshell. I am not going to sugarcoat it, because doing so will serve no one.

Dean's ascent was not illegal at the time in which he did it. You are mad at him, not because he broke any law, but because he inadvertently exposed a system that didn't work and that, if corrected, would create more restrictions on climbing in The Canyonlands, which is exactly what happened.

Andrew even went as far as to say that he would have bought Dean a beer if he had been more sneaky ... more >>


Location: UT : Moab Area : Arches National Park : Arches NP - Anchor Replacem...
By: KCP When: Feb 1, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: Tony,

From past forums, it's pretty clear to me that you are a bright guy, so I have to wonder why you are trying to hang this discussion up on a point that I have now explained several times.

Lets try this on for size. You keep suggesting that my comment was directed at you (Tony Bubb), among others, when, if you were to read back to the point at which you actually entered the forum, you would realize that you came into the forum long after I made that comment, which was meant for the people... more >>


Location: UT : Moab Area : Arches National Park : Arches NP - Anchor Replacem...
By: KCP When: Feb 1, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: "I don't remember talking about Dean and the arch at all. I recall telling you that the reasons why I chose not to climb on arches was other than what you insisted about me and everyone else. No less, I'll take your advice and move on. Nobody likes talking with a bully anyway."

Correction. You presented a this-or-that scenario as your argument for why my comment could not be correct. Then you told me that I was full of it. I took that to mean that you felt that I was being disingenuous... more >>


Location: UT : Moab Area : Arches National Park : Arches NP - Anchor Replacem...
By: KCP When: Feb 1, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: Tony,

Are you looking for a merit badge for not climbing DA? Otherwise, what is your point? I have very clearly described my stance on this issue, and I have stood by it throughout all of the backlash from people like you. Why don't you explain exactly why I am full of it, and what I am full of.


Location: UT : Moab Area : Arches National Park : Arches NP - Anchor Replacem...
By: KCP When: Feb 1, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: "This is imperically incorrect. There are two possibilities then-

1) That is was closed, so none of us did.
2) That it was open and none of us did.

Regardless, consider your point refuted. Either the arch was closed and Dean climbed a closed arch, or...
It was open and none of us climbed it.

So maybe you are just a little full of it here."


Nice try, Tony, but resorting to false dilemma is a bit condescending. How bout another more obvious possibility like: Most people just assumed... more >>


Location: UT : Moab Area : Arches National Park : Arches NP - Anchor Replacem...
By: KCP When: Jan 31, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: "I like informal rules that don't specifically forbid actions(grey areas are nice as long as we aren't childish and don't exploit them."

Most of us prefer informal rules. Unfortunately they don't work on such a large scale.


"I think of the Black Canyon of the Gunnison as the model for which all parks should aspire - climbers maintain a low profile and do their climbing with no publicity or media spotlight. Obviously Arches is a bit different because of the accessible nature and... more >>


Location: UT : Moab Area : Arches National Park : Arches NP - Anchor Replacem...
By: KCP When: Jan 31, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: "No offense Ken, but I think you are sidestepping my point. I do see your point, and I want to agree with you. In almost any case but this I would. It is just those cameras he insisted on having film the climb. I think I already said that I wouldn't have had a problem with Potter climbing Delicate Arch if he hadn't blown it up to the media. I would have bought him a beer if he had kept it low profile and found out by word of mouth and not through anchor restrictions at one of my favorite cl... more >>


Location: UT : Moab Area : Arches National Park : Arches NP - Anchor Replacem...
By: KCP When: Jan 31, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: No hard feelings, Brad. I would be glad to have a beer with you anytime. I think sharing our love of climbing would make for much better conversation this beating this dead horse any more.


Location: UT : Moab Area : Arches National Park : Arches NP - Anchor Replacem...
By: KCP When: Jan 31, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: No offense, Andrew, but I think you missed my point.


Location: UT : Moab Area : Arches National Park : Arches NP - Anchor Replacem...
By: KCP When: Jan 31, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: "Ken,

Thanks for trying to enlighten us."


You're welcome.


"1. You implied that what Dean did was no different than any of the first ascentionists that have placed anchors on a tower route in Arches and that they promoted themselves in the same fashion as Dean.

Wrong.

If that were true then the following would have happened after all of those other climbs.

a. they would have been the direct catalyst for climbing closures in the park

b. they would have drawn federal scrutiny... more >>


Location: UT : Moab Area : Arches National Park : Arches NP - Anchor Replacem...
By: KCP When: Jan 31, 2007

view comment >>
Comments: Sam,

I should have been more specific when I said "It makes THOSE OF YOU who are doing it sound like a bunch of spoiled brats." You were not included in that statement. I was referring to the Dean bashers. They are doing nothing to help this situation.


Page 6 of 10.  <<First   <Prev   4  5  6  7  8   Next>   Last>>